Question:

Hi there! For a non-furnace home that tries to rely on passive solar alone, what kind of windows would you want on the south-side? Would you prefer a high SGHC over a low U-value? For example (www.efficientwindows.org) a single-pane window has a SGHC of 0.76 and a U-value of 1.25 whereas a double-pane, low-e window’s SGHC is between 0.30 and 0.55. Does anybody know about a manufacturer that carries a window with U-value of 0.30 and SGHC of 0.55? Thanks!

Response:

> For a non-furnace home that tries to rely on passive solar alone, what kind > of windows would you want on the south-side? Would you prefer a high SGHC > over a low U-value?

I wouldn’t try to rely on passive solar alone, unless you happen to be located in the sunny Southwest USA, or someplace like that elsewhere on the globe. Most of the classic passive solar houses and design rules for classic passive solar houses don’t work in any other climate. There are much better design options. Read the archives of alt.solar.thermal > For example (www.efficientwindows.org) a single-pane window has a SGHC of > 0.76 and a U-value of 1.25 whereas a double-pane, low-e window’s SGHC is > between 0.30 and 0.55.

Given a typical Low-E U-value of .30, the single pane lets OUT 4x as much heat, while it lets IN 2.5-1.3 x as much solar gain. During the heating season more than half the day is spent letting heat out, with no sun coming in. Put the single pane on a collector, perhaps, but use Low-E for the windows. > Does anybody know about a manufacturer that carries a window with U-value of > 0.30 and SGHC of 0.55?

This is a question I want to know about, too. Pretty much all of the Low-E windows I’ve looked at, in the Northeast USA, where solar gain is desirable, have SGHC’s that seem more appropriate to the Southern USA (airconditioning), or to East and West walls in the Northeast. They also have fairly poor VT (0.6 or so). I want some decent windows for my South wall which have a low U value with relatively high SGHC and VT. — Cats, Coffee, Chocolate…vices to live by

Response:

Question:

Can anyone give me advice on carrying out a home energy audit ?

Response:

> Can anyone give me advice on carrying out a home energy audit ?

Obtain a killa-watt meter, or something similar. Plug all your electrical devices in one by one, ideally for at least a day to get an idea of how much energy each uses in a typical day. Sort the resultant list by energy use. Repeat with other sources of energy. — Two parrots sitting on a perch.  One asks the other, "Can you smell fish?"

Response:

Try this link as a good starting point http://www.hydroonenetworks.com/en/efficiency/appliance_calculator/

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Can anyone give me advice on carrying out a home energy audit ?

Response:

> Can anyone give me advice on carrying out a home energy audit ?

Others have posted some ideas, I’ll add my $0.02 If you’re looking to power your home from non traditional sources, a good first step is as others have suggested.  Buy a portable watt-meter and take some measurements. If you’re looking to reduce your heating bill this winter, try contacting your utility.  Many have FREE energy audit programs where they will come in and do a few basic tests.  How clean your furnace is burning, how leaky your doors/windows are, that sort of thing.  Much of the information they will provide you is available elsewhere, but the price is right and it is relevant for the average homeowner in your area.  Then with their information you can devise a ‘plan of attack’.  They will usually help you figure out where you can get ‘the most bang for your buck’.  Some of the cheaper things people can do turn out to have really big savings (like chaulking/weatherstripping). daestrom

Response:

>> Can anyone give me advice on carrying out a home energy audit ? >Obtain a killa-watt meter, or something similar. >Plug all your electrical devices in one by one, ideally for at least a day >to get an idea of how much energy each uses in a typical day.

im in the UK . will the kill a watt work over here ?

Response:

>>> Can anyone give me advice on carrying out a home energy audit ? >Obtain a killa-watt meter, or something similar. >Plug all your electrical devices in one by one, ideally for at least a day >to get an idea of how much energy each uses in a typical day.

I have a cheaper version but this is the closest I found on a search for a replacement. <http://www.maplin.co.uk/products/module.asp?CartID=031019122629459&mo…> AJH

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->>> Can anyone give me advice on carrying out a home energy audit ? >>Obtain a killa-watt meter, or something similar. >>Plug all your electrical devices in one by one, ideally for at least a day >>to get an idea of how much energy each uses in a typical day. >I have a cheaper version but this is the closest I found on a search >for a replacement. ><http://www.maplin.co.uk/products/module.asp?CartID=031019122629459&mo…> >AJH

thanks. just what i need.

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->>>> Can anyone give me advice on carrying out a home energy audit ? >>>Obtain a killa-watt meter, or something similar. >>>Plug all your electrical devices in one by one, ideally for at least a day >>>to get an idea of how much energy each uses in a typical day. >I have a cheaper version but this is the closest I found on a search >for a replacement. ><http://www.maplin.co.uk/products/module.asp?CartID=031019122629459&mo…> > thanks. just what i need.

If the same one I have, then it works OK for most loads. It misreads quite a lot on my PC power supply, reading high by 100%. —  <Squawk> Pieces of eight!  <Squawk> Pieces of eight!  <Squawk> Pieces of eight!  <Squawk> Pieces of eight!  <Squawk> Pieces of eight!  <Squawk> Pieces of nine!  <SYSTEM HALTED: parroty error!>

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->>>>> Can anyone give me advice on carrying out a home energy audit ? >>>>Obtain a killa-watt meter, or something similar. >>>>Plug all your electrical devices in one by one, ideally for at least a day >>>>to get an idea of how much energy each uses in a typical day. >>I have a cheaper version but this is the closest I found on a search >>for a replacement. >><http://www.maplin.co.uk/products/module.asp?CartID=031019122629459&mo…> > thanks. just what i need. >If the same one I have, then it works OK for most loads. >It misreads quite a lot on my PC power supply, reading high by >100%.

shit. why is that ? and how much does your pc use ?

Response:

> >If the same one I have, then it works OK for most loads. >It misreads quite a lot on my PC power supply, reading high by >100%. > shit. why is that ? and how much does your pc use ?

As to why, probably the PC’s switching power supply has a very strange power factor, i.e. the current waveform throws the meter off. %mod%

Response:

>> >If the same one I have, then it works OK for most loads. > >It misreads quite a lot on my PC power supply, reading high by > >100%. > shit. why is that ? and how much does your pc use ? > As to why, probably the PC’s switching power supply has a very strange > power factor, i.e. the current waveform throws the meter off.

It’s not the power factor. Power factor is a measure of how much the alternating current and voltage is in step. The PSU in question has a power factor of 1. However, the current is very spiky, not smooth, and the meter can’t keep up with it, and miscalculates the power. (the PSU was around $10(us) and has now failed. I’m about to open it up and investigate the circuit.) — Windows 2000, software for next millenia.     <latin pun alert>  - Ian Stirling.

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->> >If the same one I have, then it works OK for most loads. >> >It misreads quite a lot on my PC power supply, reading high by >> >100%. >> shit. why is that ? and how much does your pc use ? > As to why, probably the PC’s switching power supply has a very strange > power factor, i.e. the current waveform throws the meter off. >It’s not the power factor. >Power factor is a measure of how much the alternating current and voltage >is in step. >The PSU in question has a power factor of 1. >However, the current is very spiky, not smooth, and the meter can’t >keep up with it, and miscalculates the power. >(the PSU was around $10(us) and has now failed. I’m about to open it up >and investigate the circuit.)

be careful ! i read those capacitors inside carry quite a charge.

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->> …probably the PC’s switching power supply has a very strange >> power factor, i.e. the current waveform throws the meter off. >It’s not the power factor. Power factor is a measure of how much >the alternating current and voltage is in step. >The PSU in question has a power factor of 1. >However, the current is very spiky, not smooth, and the meter can’t >keep up with it, and miscalculates the power. >The power factor is the ratio of real power in watts to apparent power in >volt-amperes, regardless of waveform. Brand Electronics meters do well >with these spikey waveforms. >Please keep discussions like these OUT of alt.solar.thermal, >which is only for "practical uses of the sun’s heat."

do you own alt.solar.thermal ?

Response:

> > As to why, probably the PC’s switching power supply has a very strange > power factor, i.e. the current waveform throws the meter off. > It’s not the power factor. > Power factor is a measure of how much the alternating current and voltage > is in step. > The PSU in question has a power factor of 1. > However, the current is very spiky, not smooth, and the meter can’t > keep up with it, and miscalculates the power. > (the PSU was around $10(us) and has now failed. I’m about to open it up > and investigate the circuit.)

If "the current is very spiky, not smooth," then I’d say that the alternating current and voltage are not very much in step (presumably the voltage waveform is smooth as normal) and thus "a measure of how much the alternating current and voltage is in step" would point this out as a PF<>1. Thanks for the confirmation that the current waveform throws the meter off. A spiky current waveform is often the case for switchmode power supplies that rectify the mains AC to DC. %mod%

Response:

Question:

Dear Group,   Does anyone here have any information related to transpired collectors being used for residential applications? I have been reading NREL’S reports of efficiency, and i’m impressed at the performance of an unglazed collector. When these guys are talking perforated sheets, how small of holes and hole spacing are they talking about here? Thanks for any info you might have. M Russon

Response:

Hi Mike,

> Dear Group, >   Does anyone here have any information related to transpired > collectors being used for residential applications? I have been > reading NREL’S reports of efficiency, and i’m impressed at the > performance of an unglazed collector. When these guys are talking > perforated sheets, how small of holes and hole spacing are they > talking about here? Thanks for any info you might have. > M Russon

Solarwall systems are intended primarily for industrial buildings that exhaust large quantities of contaminated air from the industrial process inside the building.  Its costs them money to heat the clean air needed to replace the bad air.  The Solarwall system saves some of that money by bringing in outside air which is "somewhat pre-heated;" it is given a conventionally-fueled added boost to bring it up to room temperature. Solarwall’s unglazed "transpired" collectors usually produce air from 30 to 60 degF in winter, depending on outside temperature.  A characteristic of the SolarWall collector is that it must be run at a higher flow rate than a glazed collector, in order to keep the absorber cool and run efficiently. There is always some heat loss from any thermal collector, but a high absorber plate temperature on an unglazed collector has an unacceptably great heat loss.  That characteristic has the effect of limiting Solarwall to industrial applications which have high existing ventilation air flow rates.  Smaller buildings containing only people (not industrial processes) do not usually have a ventilation air flow rate that is high enough to keep a decent-sized  "transpired" collector adequately cool. In the industrial situation, the amount of air (at outside temperature) flowing into the building is matched by air (at room temperature) leaving the building.  A dedicated vent is provided to allow air to exit, as it is pushed out by the air the intake fan brings in.  This exchange continues after a SolarWall installation.  The justification for the continued loss of the heat in the out-going air is that they were losing it already, and at least incoming air is now being pre-heated.  In terms of heat loss, they are "getting back to zero."  In the industrial situation, getting back to zero is a big improvement. However, for a house, Solarwall would mean losing all of the heat you would collect. Even if a homeowner were somehow to justify dumping all that heated air (maybe on the argument that at least they’re getting plenty of fresh air?), homes (small offices, stores, etc.), there is another problem – they don’t require enough volume of ventilation air to run a decent-sized transpired collector at a cool enough temperature for efficient operation. So, instead, homes use recirculating systems in which inside air is routed from interior to collector, then back to the interior; outside air is excluded.  All the heat that is produced is retained inside the home. "Recirculating" systems run at a slightly higher temperature, hence they are glazed. They produce air from 90 to 130 degF in winter, depending on outside temperature, direction, and amount of sun.  The higher output temperatures mean further heating is not needed.  That saves money by eliminating a tie-in with the furnace.  A "direct-to-the-inside" air system (as opposed to one connected to the furnace ducting) means a significant savings in installation, and less equipment is required. Bill Kreamer

Response:

Question:

        This with just 0.7 C rise . Imagine what will happen with the predicted 5.8 C rise by the end of the century. Even the crops will soon start burning leading to mass famine and death. It might get even worse if methane boils from ocean depths as it is ten times as powerful in greenhouse warming.         So how can one cool Mother Earth 1. Stop all pop growth immediately . Impose a three child limit and cut off aid to countries which average more than that . 2.Mirrors in space to reflect sunlight 3.Sprnkle iron filings to encourage plankton growth and co2 falls to bottom 4.Add here excerpts independent.co.uk Britain bakes, Europe burns. Is this proof of global warming? By Michael McCarthy, Environment Editor 05 August 2003 If it isn’t proof of global warming at last, it certainly looks like it. As much of Europe burns like a furnace and rivers run dry across the continent, Britain is bracing itself for its own record temperature. Sometime tomorrow, in southern England or the Midlands, the mercury in the thermometer may pass 37.1C, which became the national record when registered in Cheltenham on 3 August 1990. That centigrade peak translates as 98.8 Fahrenheit, so the remarkable figure for Britain of 99 or even 100F- is on the cards. "We reckon there’s a 20 per cent chance it will happen, but in any case it’s going to get very very close," said Andy Yeatman of the Met Office. A record would be hugely significant – a three-figure Fahrenheit temperature for the UK would be breaking psychological as well as new meteorological ground as it would give many people for the first time the perception that global warning is a real, not a theoretical phenomenon – and that it is happening to them. If we do see a record, and possibly 100F, meteorological scientists will not directly attribute it to climate change – natural climate variability is too great for a single heat episode to be put down to global warming. But they will certainly say it is in line with what global warming is predicted to produce by complex mathematical models of the Earth’s climate run on supercomputers. And even if the record is not quite breached, Britain’s weather services are agreed that tomorrow temperatures will be in the upper 30s Centigrade (or the high 90s Fahrenheit), certainly hitting 35-36C (95-97F). These are temperatures that, in the past, have been reached only a few times per century, and in anticipation, temporary speed restrictions were imposed yesterday on some of Britain’s busiest rail routes for fear of rails buckling in the heat. Long-distance Virgin routes from London to the Midlands and the North will be most affected, with a 60mph limit imposed by Network Rail along the west coast main line from Euston to Crewe and the cross-country network. Individuals should be equally careful. Don’t plan anything strenuous, put suncream on the children and keep your bottled water handy. Britain will bake. It has been coming for weeks. Across Europe, an unending episode of unprecedented heat has this summer reduced major rivers to a trickle in Italy, turned southern France into an inferno of forest fires and sent people in Germany to their deaths from heatstroke. Only the Atlantic westerly winds have kept the burning air from Britain – and now the winds are blowing from the south-east, and blowing the heat our way. But what a contrast, in central and Eastern Europe, with just a year ago. Then the problems were not heat and drought – they were torrential downpours and flooding. As two depressions came together last August and dumped a deluge of biblical proportions over southern Germany, the Czech Republic, Austria and Hungary, the region’s great rivers burst their banks and drowned more than 100 people amid millions of pounds worth of damage. The two jewel cities of Mitteleuropa, Dresden and Prague, were inundated as the Elbe and the Vltava overflowed, and only its high flood defence walls saved Budapest as the Danube rose nearly 10 metres. (This year it is, in places, only a metre deep). However, Europe’s record soaking summer of 2002 and its record baking summer of 2003 do not cancel each other out in terms of indicating global warming – just the opposite. Both are in line with one of the key features predicted for climate change, if levels of greenhouses gases in the atmosphere, such as carbon dioxide (CO2), keep going up – more extreme weather occurs. "They are both consistent with what the computer models of the climate are saying will become more frequent, if CO2 levels continue to rise," said Simon Brown, who is in charge of researching extreme events at the Met Office’s Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research. Higher temperatures mean the air could hold more moisture, Dr Brown said, so even in a dry summer, when rain falls, it could be much heavier. Five weeks ago, in an unprecedented announcement, the World Meteorological Organisation signalled weather extremes were being recorded all across the world, from Switzerland’s hottest-ever June to a record month for tornadoes in the US – and linked them to global warming directly. No one can prove it. But as you swelter in the heat today, you should realise the evidence is stacking up. Portugal Portugal declared a state of national disaster yesterday after the worst spate of forest fires in more than two decades killed nine people, torched thousands of hectares of tinder-dry forest and destroyed scores of homes, writes Tim Gaynor. The emergency declaration allowed more than

Question:

Just inspected our generator at our northern transmitter site this weekend and found the hourmeter at 18,243 hours… Did a full compression check and maintnence round, found the compression to be as follows. Cyl-1 410/415 Cyl-2 410/410 Cyl-3 415-420 Cyl-4 410/410 Values are no additional oil and added oil to check ring leakage. Engines were warm during the comression test with the gauge at the glowplug ports. Average fuel consumption has been 0.67gal/hr with an average load of 4.5Kw balanced 240v. When I shut the set down the first thing I noticed was the battery had long since frozen and cracked. I check the sets about every 90 days and change the oil at that point. The oil change for this set is move one 55 gal drum from under the set and roll another under it. I have a long extension that runs from the pump inlet to the bottom of the drum and also has an optical liquid senser on the end.  The old oil is still clean and usable but it gets dumped into the second 4500 gal standby tank for its final process. The oil pan is modified with a quick disconnect for the pickup and the drain plug is now a rubber return hose to basically make it a dry sump engine. No muss or fuss. I monitor the generator basics using telemetry to monitor temp oil level (fuel tank float) and our local tank levels. The only reason I bring all of this up is because I have seen many here who are looking for a cheap and reliable means of off-grid power, well it looks like the surplus sets we picked up from Northwest Equipment should do you quite well. Im not trying to advertise for this guy but Im the type who will speak honestly to a forum. Hardly anyone in this age speaks of good its always this guy screwed me or sold a bad whatever so I would like to show some positive where I can. If you want a cheap reliable and somewhat quiet prime power set for off-grid this is the generator to do it with. For the cost of jurry-rigging a generator to a VW engine and screwing around with governors you can get one of these surplus sets delivered to you. The only issue for the homeowner would be moving the set around. With the weight of a small VW you are going to need some big casters under this thing to support it! Looks like I will be buying 3 more of these sets from this guy to replace the worn out china sets we keep for standby power. Both have under 5000 hours and drink oil faster than fuel is consumed. Just thought I would pass this along to you guys. Good luck and keep’er at 60hz The Boogin’man —-== Posted via Newsfeed.Com – Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==—- http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups —= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers – Total Privacy via Encryption =—

Response:

>Glad to hear it. For someone who needs a prime power application, a >set like that onan is perfect. For me, for an occasional emergency >use, I found the onan to be a little redundant/expensive. So I bought >a small diesel generator from the military. Now if I was single I >would probably buy the onan djc for just the coolness factor. >ignoramus

Ok I did something off-the-wall today. At the moment Im running 2 DJ series sets in parallel. One is my home DJC that I use for prime power and the other is a 3.0-DJA wired for 120/240. Both are paralleled together using a voltmeter between a large Square-D type QOB breaker and I close it when the voltage reads zero volts. The sad thing is I let the DJA run out of fuel but didnt know it as the generator was phase locked to the DJC thus turning it into a big mechanical load bank and making alot of heat in the process! Nothing damaged but before the set ran out of fuel I was pulling a steady 18Kw from both sets using a set of heater elements from discarded furnaces! Not something you should try with a Coleman or other light iron set. Thought I would share this with the group! Boogie’n man (crazy person?) —-== Posted via Newsfeed.Com – Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==—- http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups —= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers – Total Privacy via Encryption =—

Response:

>>Both are paralleled > together using a voltmeter between a large Square-D type QOB breaker > and I close it when the voltage reads zero volts. The sad thing is I >how do you get them phase locked???

I suspect he just lets them run a nearly the same frequency and closes the breaker when the meter reads zero (difference between them).  The governors in the two gensets would then be in charge of load-sharing between them, hopefully that works out OK… — ComputerSmiths Consulting, Inc.    www.compusmiths.com

Response:

>boogieman, can you explain how you get the fuel into the generator, I >assume that you have a huge fuel tank abd do not use the integral fuel >tank on the onan. >Same with lubricatoin oil. >ignoramus

The long running Onan… I have close to 3200 gallons of fuel on the site at any given time and we have a fuel delivery service fill the tank when the road is open, fuel is of secondary cost when you are keeping part of the statwide emergency communications system up and running. We cant get utility to the top of the hill because of the terrain and other factors. The fuel is pulled up with a small lift pump that fills a "day tank" and from there the engine sips on the 30 gallons for a day or so depending on what the loading is like with the trunked repeaters and if they fire the tornado sirens. Yes a DJC will run a small loudmouth siren but it doesnt care for it. The oil system was explained earlier, I built a steel "rack" to hold the generator above a 55 gallon drum and plumbed in a quick release connection for the oil lift pump and a rubber drain hose to return the oil to the drum. When its time to change the oil all I do is pull the quick disconnects and slide the used drum out from under the set then slide the new one under after I dropped the pickup line into the small bung and return the drain to the large bung. The factory pump has enough lift to pull the oil from the bottom of the tank to the engine and the oil temp never exceeds 160F so its not an issue. The old oil gets recycled into the underground tank for its "proper" disposal. Hope I dont have to return until July but who knows. Boogeyin’off to bed —-== Posted via Newsfeed.Com – Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==—- http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups —= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers – Total Privacy via Encryption =—

Response:

>I suspect he just lets them run a nearly the same frequency and closes >the breaker when the meter reads zero (difference between them).  The >governors in the two gensets would then be in charge of load-sharing >between them, hopefully that works out OK…

Actually I phase them by govenor to get the frequency to match and walk it to zero degrees by measuring the combined voltage between the sets on a common neutral then close the switch. At this point they are locked together but if one lags in power output it gets "dragged" along by the other due to motor action in the generator. Matching the output is a bit trickier as I have to monitor voltage vs. current flow on both sides and I have to play with the regulation to maintain the voltage. Think of it as forward vs. reflected power, one generator is 122v the other is 120v, you have 2 volts reflected back to the other set while they are both producing 60hz. The one set wants to speed slightly because of the higher voltage crest but it cant being phase locked. I use an O’scope to monitor current across one wire coupled up with an isolation transformer and the 2nd channel of the scope monitors the voltage. I look for a lag between the 2 waveforms and use this to calculate the voltage diffrence between the sets. Crude but effective it takes a little work to get it right without burning things up. Hope this answers your questions but please dont try this with a common Coleman generator unless you like the smell of burnt windings, they do not parallel at all because they lack a real voltage regular among other things. Boogeyin’off to bed! —-== Posted via Newsfeed.Com – Unlimited-Uncensored-Secure Usenet News==—- http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! >100,000 Newsgroups —= 19 East/West-Coast Specialized Servers – Total Privacy via Encryption =—

Response:

Question:

I just finished reading a newspaper story, "Energy efficient and mighty sturdy–concrete has considerable insulation qualities…" by Alan Heavens, in the Sunday March 30, 2003 Philadelphia Inquirer. Was this inspired by the concrete industry, who have been "helping" Habitat for Humanity save energy? These concrete guys seem really pernicious. Some of them also push costly and inefficient lukewarm concrete sunspaces via the Passive Solar Industries Council aka Sustainable Building Industry Council…   Although all the members of PSIC, especially the Technical Committee,   contributed to the financial and technical support of the Guidelines,   several contributed far beyond the call of duty. Stephen Szoke, Director   of National Accounts, National Concrete Masonry Association, Chairman of   PSIC’s Board of Directors during the development of the Guildlines; and   James Tann, Brick Institute of America, Region 4, Chairman of PSIC’s   Technical Committee during the development of these guidelines…   gave unstintingly of their time, their expertise, and their enthusiasm. Mr. Heavens writes:

  Notice how dense a concrete wall is? This denseness, thermal mass,   deflects heat in the summer and absorbs it in the winter. Heat moves by conduction, radiation, and convection. How does it move by "deflection"? We might say concrete acts like a heat mirror, REflecting longwave infrared heat radiation. But it doesn’t do that. It can absorb heat, as a thermal capacitor, but that doesn’t help keep a house warm or cool in most climates… The ASHRAE Handbook of Fundamentals says the thermal conductivity of concrete is 0.54 Btu/h-ft-F, ie its R-value (insulation value) is 1/(12×0.54) = 0.154 per inch, vs R5 per inch for Styrofoam or R19 for 6" of fiberglass insulation, which can insulate like 19/0.154 = 123" of concrete, ie a 10′ thick concrete wall. Concrete on the inside walls of a house can help store solar heat that comes in the windows and reduce the amount of energy a furnace has to supply after the sun goes down, ie it can help with passive solar house heating by allowing the use of more south windows. OTOH, windows are poor insulators, so more windows require more "backup heat" on a cloudy day. Concrete inside a house is also useful for cooling by night ventilation at certain times of year. Open the windows or turn on a whole-house fan at night, and button the house up during the day, storing coolth in the walls. This works better if the occupants are willing to tolerate large temperature swings, but the energy benefits are small in many climates. On the outside walls of a house (or inside ICF foam walls), concrete can reduce the maximum capacity required for a heating or cooling system, ie its first cost, but it doesn’t reduce the yearly energy bill much, except for lucky homeowners located in climates where a massless house might have to be air-conditioned during the day and heated at night for days on end. In that case, exterior concrete can smooth out the daily temp swings to the point that a house only needs AC or only needs heat on a particular day. That can help lower the energy bill on an average day in March in Tucson, where NREL says the 24-hour average daily temp is 58.7 F, with an average daily min and max of 44.6 and 72.8. It can help in April through June, but not much in July, with an 86.6 average temp and 73.6 and 99.4 min and max. It doesn’t help much in August or September. It can help in October and November, vs December and January, with 51.3, 38.6, and 63.9 F. It can help in Phila in June, with a 71.8 F average and 61.8 and 86.1 min and max (but how many people in Phila heat their houses at night in June?). It won’t help much in any other month in Phila, eg January, with a 30.4 average and 22.8 and 37.9 min and max. A concrete house has little energy advantage over a frame house in January in Phila. It might use  more  energy, with more heat storage and less-effective higher-temp nighttime setbacks. Mr. Heavens continues:   With as little as two inches of styrofoam insulation, R-values of 35   or more can be obtained, depending on geographical location. But these "dynamic R-values" are rarely applicable. This is like saying a car gets very good gas milage under certain conditions (eg downhill :-) Mr. Heavens cites Pieter VanderWerf, a "professor of management at Boston University" who did statistics on 29 concrete and 29 frame houses in 1997 and concluded "the insulation qualities of concrete saved the typical homeowner $221 a year for heating and $89 for cooling," and "The percentage of energy saving showed no discernible relationship to local climate." He tentatively concluded that "…these rates of savings should be fairly constant, regardless of location." A Google search on Pieter VanderWerf shows a National Concrete Masonry Association reference which seems to indicate that Dr. VanderWerf is more than a disinterested management professor–that he is also presidents of Christy Concrete Products and Building Works, Inc., and the Portland Cement Association flies him around the country. Here’s one web review of Dr. VanderWerf’s $49.95 book, "The Portland Cement Association’s Guide to Concrete Homebuilding Systems":   Not a How to Book   This is the first book I have ever returned to Amazon. I was looking for a   book to tell me "How To". This book is more advertising than anything else. Here’s a letter in the January/February 1999 issue of Home Energy Magazine:   Field Testing ICF Article   I wish Home Energy would be more careful in publishing "technical" articles   such as the one on ICFs ("Foam Forms Bring Concrete Results," July/Aug ‘98,   p. 27). The ICF industry has consistently avoided the field testing of its   product until very recently, unabashedly claiming R-values of up to R-60   without any documentation other than hazily described "research" that is   never submitted for review. Even the newest "study" by Dr. VanderWerf is   more pseudoscience than anything else. It is not inconceivable that a   difference in conditioning energy of 40% could be found between a   two-story-with-basement house insulated with ICFs and one with modest levels   of above-grade wall insulation and bare concrete basement walls. However, to   assert this has been proven through the "research" from the report is   dishonest and should be regarded with extreme skepticism.   A matched-pair study design is used to measure savings; however, there is   not enough detail in the report to establish whether the "savings" reported   by the author are due to anything other than chance. We are not told the   actual R-values of the components in the houses, the window areas and   U-values, or the infiltration rates. We must assume they are identical (save   for the wall type); the study does not document that they are. There is no   mention of the types of heating system in the matched pairs; that is, one   could contain a ducted heating system and the other zonal heat. The climates   used for comparison are not carefully described, so a matched pair in the   "Canada" district could conceivably pair a house in a maritime climate with   a house on the open prairie. There are many other potential sources of error   that are not carefully addressed in VanderWerf’s report.   The Portland Cement Foundation (sponsors of the report) would have better   spent their money in a more closely controlled prototype analysis in a few   climates. In fact, guarded hot-box tests have now been performed on several   ICF walls and have found R-values in a range that seems reasonable (R-17 to   R-25), given the wall materials and my own experience modeling several of   these walls with contemporary simulation programs (under hire to various ICF   manufacturers)…   Bob Davis   Ecotope   Seattle, Washington Dr. VanderWerf responds:   Many thanks to Bob Davis for raising important and useful issues. Some of   Mr. Davis’s concerns are covered in our report. We tested the possible role   of chance by the conventional method, the confidence interval. This   indicated that the savings, with over 97% confidence, were not the result of   chance alone. Air infiltration is not assumed to be constant. In fact, we   know from blower door tests that it is significantly lower in homes with ICF   walls. Reduced infiltration is actually believed to be the greatest single   factor accounting for the lower energy consumption of ICF homes.   A few of Mr. Davis’s concerns were unfortunately not covered because of the   summary nature of the report. During our study, we did determine several   details of the HVAC systems used and we corrected for differences. Matched   pairs of houses were within 2 miles of each other in 80% of all cases; in a   few situations we were forced to go as far as 20 miles to get a fair match.   A few of Mr. Davis’s other concerns are about statistical research in   general. In any research, it is impossible to control for all variables.   Monitoring and measurement studies cope by eliminating or controlling as   many sources of variation as are practical. Statistical studies measure and   correct for some variation, and determine whether other sources of variation   might introduce biases. The researcher checks independent data or a   subsample to make sure that uncontrolled variables (for example,   fenestration) do not tend to be significantly different for some groups (for   example, ICF houses) than for others. We did this and discussed it in our   report. With these conditions, statistical theorems show that point   estimates (for example, average energy savings) will still be valid. If one   does not accept this principle, one should reject our study along with all   statistical field research.   Three implied statements in the letter trouble me. The first is that the   energy performance of ICF walls can be characterized by their R-value. Work   at Oak Ridge National Laboratory and

… read more »

Response:

You are right that concrete is not an insulator. Also, concrete during production, and for a long time after releases considerable CO2 into the atmosphere! – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text –

Response:

> I just finished reading a newspaper story, "Energy efficient and mighty > sturdy–concrete has considerable insulation qualities…" by Alan Heavens

In the 70s and 80s a lot of builders jumped on the underground house fad and were happy to slap out a lot of copies of this design which didn’t work: http://www.gi.alaska.edu/ScienceForum/ASF2/images/217.jpg That big, flat concrete surface exposed to the elements acts like a big heat and cold pump :o / Some builders are putting rigid foam insulation between the earth and concrete, even under the foundation and concrete pad to turn the concrete into a huge thermal mass isolated from both outside and the earth, claiming low heating costs for that.

Response:

with proper insulation and water proofing (and southern exposure) that design http://www.gi.alaska.edu/ScienceForum/ASF2/images/217.jpg has a lot going for it. — Steve Spence Subscribe to the Renewable Energy Newsletter & Discussion Boards. Read about Sustainable Technology: http://www.green-trust.org

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> I just finished reading a newspaper story, "Energy efficient and mighty > sturdy–concrete has considerable insulation qualities…" by Alan Heavens > In the 70s and 80s a lot of builders jumped on the underground house fad > and were happy to slap out a lot of copies of this design which didn’t > work: > http://www.gi.alaska.edu/ScienceForum/ASF2/images/217.jpg > That big, flat concrete surface exposed to the elements acts like a big > heat and cold pump :o / > Some builders are putting rigid foam insulation between the earth and > concrete, even under the foundation and concrete pad to turn the > concrete into a huge thermal mass isolated from both outside and the > earth, claiming low heating costs for that.

Response:

The way I see it, it’s all relative. Every material is a thermal insulator and every material is a thermal conductor and, because the two are inversely proportional, if it’s good at being a conductor, it wont be so good at being an insulator. I think that it would be safer to say: "Concrete is not a good insulator" (although, compared to copper for example, concrete could be considered to be a very good insulator). Even better: "Concrete is not a good insulator compared to foam, fibreglass, wood etc". Cheers, Steve

Response:

>with proper insulation and water proofing (and southern exposure) that >design >http://www.gi.alaska.edu/ScienceForum/ASF2/images/217.jpg >has a lot going for it.

Agreed. There isn’t much detail on the site, but a friend with a similar underground house near Phila with large thick slabs of reinforced concrete inside large thick slabs of Styrofoam calculated his annual electric resistance heating bill as $58. Our deep soil is 55 F, and we get 1000 Btu/ft^2 on a south wall on an average 30 F Jan day, so a 30×40′ house with R30 insulation and 300 kWh/mo of electrical energy use only needs A ft^2 of R4 south windows with 50% solar transmisson, where G = 2400ft^2/R30 + A/4 + (1120-A)/30 and 500A+34.1K = 24h(70-55)G, so A = 20 ft^2. On a cloudy day, it only needs (70-55)121.7-1421 = 404 Btu/h, eg the heat from two human beings. If the indoor temp drops from 70 to 65 F over 5 30 F cloudy days with no human or electrical heat, RC = 899 h, which makes C = (RC)G = 109,278 Btu/F, eg 4371 ft^3 of concrete, eg 3500 ft^2 of walls and ceiling 1.25 feet thick. We might do better with more foam and just enough concrete for structural purposes. On the web site, it looks like the air inlet is higher than the outlet, which means it can’t work by natural stack effect. The stovepipe goes up the air outlet pipe. This house doesn’t need a stove, but it would be more efficient as a counterflow air-air heat exchanger with stovepipe exhaust or warm house air rising in an inner pipe and incoming cool air falling down a pipe around it. With good south glazing, it might not need any "solar collectors." Nick

Response:

> I just finished reading a newspaper story, "Energy efficient and mighty > sturdy–concrete has considerable insulation qualities…" by Alan Heavens, > in the Sunday March 30, 2003 Philadelphia Inquirer.

It looks like there was some good work done by ORNL regarding high thermal mass/insulation combinations in various climates. http://www.ornl.gov/roofs+walls/research/detailed_papers/thermal/inde… ORNL has explored dynamic performance of insulation/thermal storage  vs. location for various climates. I think this is where the concrete guys have come up with the "performs like R-20" for R-10 rigid insulation, which it appears like it does in places like Phoenix. The paper basically re-iterates some of Nick’s statements regarding concrete and insulation being better in some locations than others. Seems like maybe external insulation-internal concrete walls aren’t so good but rather  every-day construction (as measured by total wall R-values) are really bad. When the north wind blows, my house is a good example of the latter. Still seems like in some climates, in the hands of the average tradesman, the insulated concrete wall has some utility.

Response:

> I just finished reading a newspaper story, "Energy efficient and mighty > sturdy–concrete has considerable insulation qualities…" by Alan > Heavens, > in the Sunday March 30, 2003 Philadelphia Inquirer. > It looks like there was some good work done by ORNL regarding high thermal > mass/insulation combinations in various climates.

http://www.ornl.gov/roofs+walls/research/detailed_papers/thermal/inde… – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> ORNL has explored dynamic performance of insulation/thermal storage  vs. > location for various climates. I think this is where the concrete guys have > come up with the "performs like R-20" for R-10 rigid insulation, which it > appears like it does in places like Phoenix. The paper basically re-iterates > some of Nick’s statements regarding concrete and insulation being better in > some locations than others. > Seems like maybe external insulation-internal concrete walls aren’t so good > but rather  every-day construction (as measured by total wall R-values) are > really bad. When the north wind blows, my house is a good example of the > latter. > Still seems like in some climates, in the hands of the average tradesman, > the insulated concrete wall has some utility.

Thanks guys for a great discussion, A few years back I looked into rammed earth homes and was astonished that rammed earth can have very low R values, even for a 12" wall, – probably similar to  concrete, if there is enough sand in the (rammed) mix. Then I discovered that the system works by acting as a thermal flywheeel. The thermal energy that is gained during the day from the sun, leaks away at night but there is enough left in the thermal mass of the structure to keep the house warm. When there is a period of little or no-sun, the structure gets colder and colder and supplemental heating is not very efficient because of the low R value of the structure. Cheers Rua

Response:

They say the same thing about log homes (low r values) but the absence of air flow through the wall, and the thermal mass make it very comfortable and efficient. We had no problems keeping our house warm at -40 degrees, and -20F for weeks at a time. Fuel usage was much less than the stick built we moved from with similar square footage. — Steve Spence Subscribe to the Renewable Energy Newsletter & Discussion Boards. Read about Sustainable Technology: http://www.green-trust.org

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> > I just finished reading a newspaper story, "Energy efficient and mighty > > sturdy–concrete has considerable insulation qualities…" by Alan > Heavens, > > in the Sunday March 30, 2003 Philadelphia Inquirer. > It looks like there was some good work done by ORNL regarding high thermal > mass/insulation combinations in various climates.

http://www.ornl.gov/roofs+walls/research/detailed_papers/thermal/inde… – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> ORNL has explored dynamic performance of insulation/thermal storage  vs. > location for various climates. I think this is where the concrete guys > have > come up with the "performs like R-20" for R-10 rigid insulation, which it > appears like it does in places like Phoenix. The paper basically > re-iterates > some of Nick’s statements regarding concrete and insulation being better > in > some locations than others. > Seems like maybe external insulation-internal concrete walls aren’t so > good > but rather  every-day construction (as measured by total wall R-values) > are > really bad. When the north wind blows, my house is a good example of the > latter. > Still seems like in some climates, in the hands of the average tradesman, > the insulated concrete wall has some utility. > Thanks guys for a great discussion, > A few years back I looked into rammed earth homes and was astonished that > rammed earth can have very low R values, even for a 12" wall, – probably > similar to  concrete, if there is enough sand in the (rammed) mix. Then I > discovered that the system works by acting as a thermal flywheeel. The > thermal energy that is gained during the day from the sun, leaks away at > night but there is enough left in the thermal mass of the structure to keep > the house warm. When there is a period of little or no-sun, the structure > gets colder and colder and supplemental heating is not very efficient > because of the low R value of the structure. > Cheers > Rua

Response:

>They say the same thing about log homes (low r values) but the absence of >air flow through the wall, and the thermal mass make it very comfortable and >efficient…

Nonono. Then again, SUVs are more fuel-efficient than tanks. >We had no problems keeping our house warm at -40 degrees, and -20F for >weeks at a time. Fuel usage was much less than the stick built we moved >from with similar square footage.

You might call it "much less inefficient" :-) Nick

Response:

I take your point. Log homes can be less inefficient than stick built. Very comfortable, and I’d build another. — Steve Spence Subscribe to the Renewable Energy Newsletter & Discussion Boards. Read about Sustainable Technology: http://www.green-trust.org

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->They say the same thing about log homes (low r values) but the absence of >air flow through the wall, and the thermal mass make it very comfortable and >efficient… > Nonono. Then again, SUVs are more fuel-efficient than tanks. >We had no problems keeping our house warm at -40 degrees, and -20F for >weeks at a time. Fuel usage was much less than the stick built we moved >from with similar square footage. > You might call it "much less inefficient" :-) > Nick

Response:

> Heat moves by conduction, radiation, and > convection. How does it move by > "deflection"? We might say concrete acts > like a heat mirror,

Isn’t that what radiant barriers are – heat mirrors?  The sent heat back, reflect it, or so they say.

Response:

> Heat moves by conduction, radiation, and > convection. How does it move by > "deflection"? We might say concrete acts > like a heat mirror,

I think the word "deflection" is not a good choice. "Reflection" might have been intended. > Isn’t that what radiant barriers are – heat mirrors?  The sent heat back, > reflect it, or so they say.

Yes, radiant barriers do reflect heat. A barrier in the attic will reflect back some of the heat coming in from a hot roof and will reflect down radiant heat coming from below. Every object around us radiates thermal energy and the amount depends very strongly on its temperature . Technically it is proportional to the fourth power of its absolute temperature*. Double the absolute temperature and the radiant energy increases by a factor of 2×2x2×2 = 16. Radiant barriers are pretty useless against thermal conduction i.e. they have very low R values, compared with, say, 1" of fiberglass insulation. * Absolute temperature is the temp in degrees F + 460 or degrees C + 273. Cheers Rua

Response:

>…radiant barriers do reflect heat. A barrier in the attic will reflect >back some of the heat coming in from a hot roof and will reflect down >radiant heat coming from below…

They work much better for downward heatflow. >Radiant barriers are pretty useless against thermal conduction i.e. they >have very low R values, compared with, say, 1" of fiberglass insulation.

Wrong again, Madra. Look it up. Nick

Response:

>…radiant barriers do reflect heat. A barrier in the attic will reflect >back some of the heat coming in from a hot roof and will reflect down >radiant heat coming from below… > They work much better for downward heatflow.

It depends on which side of the barrier is the hotter. Can you write out the equation for radiative heat transfer? >Radiant barriers are pretty useless against thermal conduction i.e. they >have very low R values, compared with, say, 1" of fiberglass insulation. > Wrong again, Madra. Look it up.

Many radiant barriers I have seen were little more than reinforced aluminum foil, with almost zero R value. They can be designed to resist conduction, e.g. a sheet of insulating foam sandwiched between two sheets of aluminum foil. In this case it will be a good insulator as well as radiator. Beware of manufacturers fudging the calculations to prove high R values for very thin barriers. Rua – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Nick

Response:

>Many radiant barriers I have seen were little more than reinforced aluminum >foil, with almost zero R value…

Wrong again Madra. Look it up. Nick

Response:

Question:

I am working on placing  underground pipes through which I will pump water in and out of an old air conditioner core in the fresh air return of my forced air furnace with the hope of precooling the air going into my airconditioning system and hopefully reduce my cooling costs. My question is how deep do i need to go to be effective? Thanks for any replies Chris

Response:

be careful of condensation and bacteria. 10′ would be sufficient in most areas for mid 50’s temperature. — Steve Spence Subscribe to the Renewable Energy Newsletter & Discussion Boards. Read about Sustainable Technology: http://www.green-trust.org

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> I am working on placing  underground pipes through which I will pump water > in and out of an old air conditioner core in the fresh air return of my > forced air furnace with the hope of precooling the air going into my > airconditioning system and hopefully reduce my cooling costs. My question is > how deep do i need to go to be effective? > Thanks for any replies > Chris

Response:

 Chris: The answer(s) to your question depend on the type od soil conditions (rock is worst, a swamp is best), but in mid latitudes a depth of 20 to 30 inches is enough. Peter

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> I am working on placing  underground pipes through which I will pump water > in and out of an old air conditioner core in the fresh air return of my > forced air furnace with the hope of precooling the air going into my > airconditioning system and hopefully reduce my cooling costs. My question is > how deep do i need to go to be effective? > Thanks for any replies > Chris

Response:

Another issue would be local building and ‘environmental’ codes.  It comes under the heading of ‘thermal pollution’ and I have heard of counties in southern Missouri and Illinois actually making it against building code to ‘thermally pollute the aquifer or it’s feed paths’— in other words, any dirt or rock that has rain falling on it!  They supposedly citied the large number of homes using ground water (wells) for drinking and concerns about algae and bacteria growth.  The only reason I have any knowledge about this whatsoever is I have relatives in southern Missouri using groundwater heat pumps and they expressed concern that they would find a way to make these type laws that were under consideration retroactive to include previous installations. BTW, they are experiencing 30 to 45% savings over neighbors using standard heat pumps and insulation. Dutch

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> I am working on placing  underground pipes through which I will pump water > in and out of an old air conditioner core in the fresh air return of my > forced air furnace with the hope of precooling the air going into my > airconditioning system and hopefully reduce my cooling costs. My question is > how deep do i need to go to be effective? > Thanks for any replies > Chris

Response:

geothermal heat pumps do not have to be ground water types. The most common is horizontal slinky coils 8′ below grade. — Steve Spence Subscribe to the Renewable Energy Newsletter & Discussion Boards. Read about Sustainable Technology: http://www.green-trust.org

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Another issue would be local building and ‘environmental’ codes.  It comes > under the heading of ‘thermal pollution’ and I have heard of counties in > southern Missouri and Illinois actually making it against building code to > ‘thermally pollute the aquifer or it’s feed paths’— in other words, any > dirt or rock that has rain falling on it!  They supposedly citied the large > number of homes using ground water (wells) for drinking and concerns about > algae and bacteria growth.  The only reason I have any knowledge about this > whatsoever is I have relatives in southern Missouri using groundwater heat > pumps and they expressed concern that they would find a way to make these > type laws that were under consideration retroactive to include previous > installations. > BTW, they are experiencing 30 to 45% savings over neighbors using standard > heat pumps and insulation. > Dutch > I am working on placing  underground pipes through which I will pump water > in and out of an old air conditioner core in the fresh air return of my > forced air furnace with the hope of precooling the air going into my > airconditioning system and hopefully reduce my cooling costs. My question > is > how deep do i need to go to be effective? > Thanks for any replies > Chris

Response:

The unfortunate part is that these nabobs were writing the building codes in such a way to stop any THERMAL pollution which would include the slinky pipe method.  I recently got an email from a friend who was able to put a regular heat pump in an approximately 35K cu ft cave on his property that stays about 68*F (+/- ~5*F due to season).  It seems that a neighbor got a hard on for him and has been calling everyone he can think of to try and stop him from using it! I will NEVER understand why so many people are such idiots! Here in wonderful west central Florida a local business was served an injunction to stop all discharge of any chemically and/or thermally polluted water into the environment.  Sounds like a good idea, right?  Nope–the chemically and thermally polluted water was tap water that was overflow from a cooling tower for a chilled water cooling interchange circuit on a piece of stationary equipment.  Total discharge about 5 gals a day.  Isn’t it nice to know that your tap water is considered chemically polluted??????

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> geothermal heat pumps do not have to be ground water types. The most common > is horizontal slinky coils 8′ below grade. > — > Steve Spence > Subscribe to the Renewable Energy Newsletter > & Discussion Boards. Read about Sustainable Technology: > http://www.green-trust.org > Another issue would be local building and ‘environmental’ codes.  It comes > under the heading of ‘thermal pollution’ and I have heard of counties in > southern Missouri and Illinois actually making it against building code to > ‘thermally pollute the aquifer or it’s feed paths’— in other words, any > dirt or rock that has rain falling on it!  They supposedly citied the > large > number of homes using ground water (wells) for drinking and concerns about > algae and bacteria growth.  The only reason I have any knowledge about > this > whatsoever is I have relatives in southern Missouri using groundwater heat > pumps and they expressed concern that they would find a way to make these > type laws that were under consideration retroactive to include previous > installations. > BTW, they are experiencing 30 to 45% savings over neighbors using standard > heat pumps and insulation. > Dutch > > I am working on placing  underground pipes through which I will pump > water > > in and out of an old air conditioner core in the fresh air return of my > > forced air furnace with the hope of precooling the air going into my > > airconditioning system and hopefully reduce my cooling costs. My > question > is > > how deep do i need to go to be effective? > > Thanks for any replies > > Chris

Response:

Question:

What’s GSHP? — Steve Krug Designer of Engineering Systems S & K Design and Services

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Hi, > I am building a home in Sequim, Washington. My builder tells me that using a > GSHP for radiant floor heating in my area has failed to produce temperatures > in excess of 60 degrees F. > How can I find out more about this? > Thanks, > – > Robert Zeff

Response:

Ground Source Heat Pump.         If it’s properly sized and operating correctly, it will produce any temperature you want, just like a regular heat pump, except it will not lose heating ability as it gets colder outside. http://www.igshpa.okstate.edu/ http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=%22ground+source+h… – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – >What’s GSHP? >– >Steve Krug >Designer of Engineering Systems >S & K Design and Services > Hi, > I am building a home in Sequim, Washington. My builder tells me that using >a > GSHP for radiant floor heating in my area has failed to produce >temperatures > in excess of 60 degrees F. > How can I find out more about this? > Thanks, > – > Robert Zeff

>~~>~~>~~>~~>~~>~~>~~>~~>~~>~~>~~>~~>~~>~~>~~>~~>~~>~~>~~

http://helpthecritters.com/ is my domain for helping critters Coming soon – PMTherm version 2.0  !!  http://pmilligan.net/pmtherm.htm My personal site is at  http://www.pmilligan.net , featuring free HVAC, psychrometric, stock market, and other software

Response:

  I have thought that ground source heat pumps have a specific "pull", that is they can heat the air only a certain difference from the ground source.   The well water temperatures in your area are an indication of ground temperature year around. If well water is 45f in the winter and the heat pump you select can "pull" 30 degrees F with a reasonable COP (coefficient of performance – efficiency), then you should get 75 degrees out, minus the fluid to air heat exchanger losses.   I am not an expert in this area, just what I have read. Others can give us more insight in this area, if they have more knowledge. This forum can be good for that. Here is one site that I had bookmarked. http://www.waterfurnace.com/researchandarticlesG.shtml

> Ground Source Heat Pump. > If it’s properly sized and operating correctly, it will > produce any temperature you want, just like a regular heat pump, > except it will not lose heating ability as it gets colder outside. > http://www.igshpa.okstate.edu/

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&ie=ISO-8859-1&q=%22ground+source+h… p%22 – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->What’s GSHP? >– >Steve Krug >Designer of Engineering Systems >S & K Design and Services >> Hi, >> I am building a home in Sequim, Washington. My builder tells me that using >a >> GSHP for radiant floor heating in my area has failed to produce >temperatures >> in excess of 60 degrees F. >> How can I find out more about this? >> Thanks, >> – >> Robert Zeff >~~>~~>~~>~~>~~>~~>~~>~~>~~>~~>~~>~~>~~>~~>~~>~~>~~>~~>~~ > http://helpthecritters.com/ is my domain for helping critters > Coming soon – PMTherm version 2.0  !!  http://pmilligan.net/pmtherm.htm > My personal site is at  http://www.pmilligan.net , > featuring free HVAC, psychrometric, stock market, and other software

Response:

Hi, I am building a home in Sequim, Washington. My builder tells me that using a GSHP for radiant floor heating in my area has failed to produce temperatures in excess of 60 degrees F. How can I find out more about this? Thanks, – Robert Zeff

Response:

Question:

Does anyone have a source (and therefore cost) on a pelletizer (not sure that’s the right word) that could be used with Bio-mass grass? I like the idea of being virtually energy self-sufficient with a couple acres of land and (basically) a riding lawn mower. I believe the most efficient use would be with a pellet stove… unless the cost (or cost of operation) of a pelletizer is prohibitive.   If that’s the case, I’m open to suggestions. Advance Thanks;  Jim

Response:

Have you ever thought of just burning your junk mail?  I hear that you can satisfy all of your energy needs with that too.

> Does anyone have a source (and therefore cost) on a pelletizer (not sure

that’s the right word) > that could be used with Bio-mass grass? > I like the idea of being virtually energy self-sufficient with a couple acres of land and > (basically) a riding lawn mower. > I believe the most efficient use would be with a pellet stove… unless

the cost (or cost of – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> operation) of a pelletizer is prohibitive.   If that’s the case, I’m open to suggestions. > Advance Thanks;  Jim

Response:

> Does anyone have a source (and therefore cost) on a pelletizer (not sure

that’s the right word) > that could be used with Bio-mass grass? > I like the idea of being virtually energy self-sufficient with a couple acres of land and > (basically) a riding lawn mower.

You are going to run your riding lawn mower with bio-gRass so you can be virtually energy self-sufficient?  My, your grass must grow fast to supply enough energy for heat, lights, AC , electricity and fuel for your mobile equipment. > I believe the most efficient use would be with a pellet stove… unless

the cost (or cost of > operation) of a pelletizer is prohibitive.   If that’s the case, I’m open

to suggestions. Yep, burning the bio-gRass for heat would be probably the most effective. You could just skip the pellet stove concept and pitchfork it into a conventional stove. To answer your original question, no I don’t know of a grass pelletizer machine.

Response:

> Have you ever thought of just burning your junk mail?  I hear that you can > satisfy all of your energy needs with that too.

Ohhhh, the polllution from the printers ink is deadly to the ozone.  Surely there is some scientific study to prove this.  <lol>

Response:

It’s a sahme you can’t recover the energy in junk email. That would surely solve a lot of problems… — May glorious Shamash make his face to shine upon you Gilgamesh of Uruk now residing in the Kingdom of Mercia

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Have you ever thought of just burning your junk mail?  I hear that you can > satisfy all of your energy needs with that too. > Ohhhh, the polllution from the printers ink is deadly to the ozone. Surely > there is some scientific study to prove this.  <lol>

Response:

You seem to have trouble with english, so I’ll keep this simple for you. I clearly said "bio-mass grass".  Thats not lawn turf.  Particulalry, I’m looking to use switchgrass, which grows about 3.5 tons per acre per year.  And yes, I’ll be using a small tractor, not an ordinary sears riding lawn mower. A couple acres at 3.5 tons per year is a LOT of bio-mass, and therefore a LOT of BTUs. Enough energy for heat to supplement passive solar, electrical generation and yes, some ‘extra’ to sell or trade for gas for the tractor. A pellet stove is not only the most efficient (most heat out of a given energy source in), it can run for MANY hours from a hopper, and it can be controlled by a thermostat and/or the home energy automation system I’m designing. The original question was if anyone knows of a source of a pelletizer, not if YOU do or not. I’m sure you like to think you’re a member of any social class, even if it’s as vague as ‘anyone’, but your actions prove that you’re not. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Does anyone have a source (and therefore cost) on a pelletizer (not sure > that’s the right word) that could be used with Bio-mass grass? > I like the idea of being virtually energy self-sufficient with a couple > acres of land and (basically) a riding lawn mower. >You are going to run your riding lawn mower with bio-gRass so you can be >virtually energy self-sufficient?  My, your grass must grow fast to supply >enough energy for heat, lights, AC , electricity and fuel for your mobile >equipment. > I believe the most efficient use would be with a pellet stove… unless > the cost (or cost of operation) of a pelletizer is prohibitive.   If that’s the case, I’m open >to suggestions. >Yep, burning the bio-gRass for heat would be probably the most effective. >You could just skip the pellet stove concept and pitchfork it into a >conventional stove. >To answer your original question, no I don’t know of a grass pelletizer >machine.

Response:

> You seem to have trouble with english, so I’ll keep this simple for you.

Nope!  I don’t think I have a problem with english.  You are just vague. > I clearly said "bio-mass grass".  Thats not lawn turf.

Could be,  lawn clipping fall within this catagory.  Yes  I read what you wrote. Particulalry, I’m looking to use > switchgrass, which grows about 3.5 tons per acre per year.

So, is the 3.5 tons per acre per year a dry weight or is it a green weight?  And yes, I’ll be using a > small tractor, not an ordinary sears riding lawn mower.

Fine, whatever. > A couple acres at 3.5 tons per year is a LOT of bio-mass, and therefore a

LOT of BTUs. So what is the BTU/lb of *dried* switchgrass? > Enough energy for heat to supplement passive solar, electrical generation

and yes, some ‘extra’ > to sell or trade for gas for the tractor.

Great.  If everything you mention is true.  Does swithgrass have more BTI’s that alfafa hay?  Hay around me sells for about  $80 per ton.. So your yearly crop would be worth ~$560 where I live.  That would be fantastic if you could power your tractor, electricity, heat and whatever else on ~$560 per year > A pellet stove is not only the most efficient (most heat out of a given

energy source in), it > can run for MANY hours from a hopper, and it can be controlled by a

thermostat and/or the home > energy automation system I’m designing.

I know what a pellet stove is. > The original question was if anyone knows of a source of a pelletizer, not if YOU do or not. > I’m sure you like to think you’re a member of any social class, even if it’s as vague as > ‘anyone’, but your actions prove that you’re not.

LOL.  Cute

Response:

> You seem to have trouble with english, so I’ll keep this simple for you. > I clearly said "bio-mass grass".  Thats not lawn turf.  Particulalry, I’m looking to use > switchgrass, which grows about 3.5 tons per acre per year.  And yes, I’ll be using a > small tractor, not an ordinary sears riding lawn mower. > A couple acres at 3.5 tons per year is a LOT of bio-mass, and therefore a LOT of BTUs. > Enough energy for heat to supplement passive solar, electrical generation

and yes, some ‘extra’ > to sell or trade for gas for the tractor. > A pellet stove is not only the most efficient (most heat out of a given

energy source in), it > can run for MANY hours from a hopper, and it can be controlled by a

thermostat and/or the home > energy automation system I’m designing. > The original question was if anyone knows of a source of a pelletizer, not if YOU do or not. > I’m sure you like to think you’re a member of any social class, even if it’s as vague as > ‘anyone’, but your actions prove that you’re not.

Why not use horse drawn equipment?  You’d do away with needing gasoline. You could then use some of the biomass and the horse leavings to produce methane which you could then use to cook, heat the house and even run a motor. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->> Does anyone have a source (and therefore cost) on a pelletizer (not sure >> that’s the right word) that could be used with Bio-mass grass? >> I like the idea of being virtually energy self-sufficient with a couple >> acres of land and (basically) a riding lawn mower. >You are going to run your riding lawn mower with bio-gRass so you can be >virtually energy self-sufficient?  My, your grass must grow fast to supply >enough energy for heat, lights, AC , electricity and fuel for your mobile >equipment. >> I believe the most efficient use would be with a pellet stove… unless >> the cost (or cost of operation) of a pelletizer is prohibitive.   If

that’s the case, I’m open – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->>to suggestions. >Yep, burning the bio-gRass for heat would be probably the most effective. >You could just skip the pellet stove concept and pitchfork it into a >conventional stove. >To answer your original question, no I don’t know of a grass pelletizer >machine.

Response:

> Why not use horse drawn equipment?  You’d do away with needing gasoline. > You could then use some of the biomass and the horse leavings to produce > methane which you could then use to cook, heat the house and even run a > motor.

Can a horse eat "switchgrass" and survive?

Response:

> Does anyone have a source (and therefore cost) on a pelletizer (not sure

that’s the right word) > that could be used with Bio-mass grass? > I like the idea of being virtually energy self-sufficient with a couple acres of land and > (basically) a riding lawn mower. > I believe the most efficient use would be with a pellet stove… unless

the cost (or cost of > operation) of a pelletizer is prohibitive.   If that’s the case, I’m open to suggestions. > Advance Thanks;  Jim

Do you want to use green grass as a fuel?  You may get it to burn, but I think it would require at least an equal amount another fuel to get the job done. I can think of lots of better uses for green-grass pellets, such as mulch, animal feed or as an organic-matter supplement for garden soils, but the cost of pelletizing it might make it too expensive for those uses.

Response:

> You seem to have trouble with english, so I’ll keep this simple for you. > I clearly said "bio-mass grass".  Thats not lawn turf.  Particulalry, I’m looking to use > switchgrass, which grows about 3.5 tons per acre per year.  And yes, I’ll be using a > small tractor, not an ordinary sears riding lawn mower. > A couple acres at 3.5 tons per year is a LOT of bio-mass, and therefore a LOT of BTUs. > Enough energy for heat to supplement passive solar, electrical generation

and yes, some ‘extra’ > to sell or trade for gas for the tractor. > A pellet stove is not only the most efficient (most heat out of a given

energy source in), it > can run for MANY hours from a hopper, and it can be controlled by a

thermostat and/or the home – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> energy automation system I’m designing. > The original question was if anyone knows of a source of a pelletizer, not if YOU do or not. > I’m sure you like to think you’re a member of any social class, even if it’s as vague as > ‘anyone’, but your actions prove that you’re not. >> Does anyone have a source (and therefore cost) on a pelletizer (not sure >> that’s the right word) that could be used with Bio-mass grass? >> I like the idea of being virtually energy self-sufficient with a couple >> acres of land and (basically) a riding lawn mower. >You are going to run your riding lawn mower with bio-gRass so you can be >virtually energy self-sufficient?  My, your grass must grow fast to supply >enough energy for heat, lights, AC , electricity and fuel for your mobile >equipment. >> I believe the most efficient use would be with a pellet stove… unless >> the cost (or cost of operation) of a pelletizer is prohibitive.   If

that’s the case, I’m open >>to suggestions. >Yep, burning the bio-gRass for heat would be probably the most effective. >You could just skip the pellet stove concept and pitchfork it into a >conventional stove. >To answer your original question, no I don’t know of a grass pelletizer >machine.

I have seen homemade pelletizer machines that have been built from scratch and work quite well.  It’s basically a scaled-up meat grinder.  It consists of a sturdy Archimedean screw in a tube, with a steel plate at the end with holes in through which to extrude the pellets.  Some sort of gear-reduction mechanism is needed to reduce the speed of the screw to around 50 RPM.  I think a good tinkerer could put one together for less than $500.

Response:

feed the grass pellets to the animal of your choice, and it will produce the ingredients of a fuel for you; methane. — Steve Spence Subscribe to the Renewable Energy Newsletter & Discussion Boards. Read about Sustainable Technology: http://www.green-trust.org

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Does anyone have a source (and therefore cost) on a pelletizer (not sure > that’s the right word) > that could be used with Bio-mass grass? > I like the idea of being virtually energy self-sufficient with a couple > acres of land and > (basically) a riding lawn mower. > I believe the most efficient use would be with a pellet stove… unless > the cost (or cost of > operation) of a pelletizer is prohibitive.   If that’s the case, I’m open > to suggestions. > Advance Thanks;  Jim > Do you want to use green grass as a fuel?  You may get it to burn, but I > think it would require at least an equal amount another fuel to get the job > done. I can think of lots of better uses for green-grass pellets, such as > mulch, animal feed or as an organic-matter supplement for garden soils, but > the cost of pelletizing it might make it too expensive for those uses.

Response:

> feed the grass pellets to the animal of your choice, and it will produce the > ingredients of a fuel for you; methane.

If it’s a horse, it will also provide you with transport. Actually, I wonder if, given the land area involved, some of the fast growing willows or alders might not be a better fuel source than grass – after all, if your chosen grass is anything near the 80% water content of most grasses, your yield starts to look less attractive. I also recall seeing a furnace which could burn bales of straw. Perhaps worth investigating as an alternative to pellets? <SNIP> — May glorious Shamash make his face to shine upon you Gilgamesh of Uruk now residing in the Kingdom of Mercia

Response:

> feed the grass pellets to the animal of your choice, and it will produce the > ingredients of a fuel for you; methane.

Hook the same animal of choice to a wagon and you have transportation.

Response:

> > feed the grass pellets to the animal of your choice, and it will produce > the > ingredients of a fuel for you; methane.

sun-dried straw could be a good source of energy if the pelletizing is properly achieved Jukka Matikainen

Response:

> sun-dried straw could be a good source of energy if the pelletizing is > properly achieved

What is done to prevent pollution in such combustion?  While resolving CO2 problems associated with fossil fuels, burning biomass creates other pollutants.  A recent article in Science (heard interview with author on the radio, haven’t seen the article) noted that biomass fuels are contributing to considerable aerosols due to poor combustion and this in turn leads to droughts due to its affect on the weather. I hear folks suggesting that you just throw this stuff on the grates of a furnace/stove.  This doesn’t sound like an ideal cumbustion environment. You need high temps to get complete combustion (though high temps promote NOx pollution).  Catalytic combustors seem to have dropped out of sight. What types of devices are these biofuels aimed at? Mike

Response:

> sun-dried straw could be a good source of energy if the pelletizing is > properly achieved > What is done to prevent pollution in such combustion?

Nothing, if the combustion is done in a private individual setting such as a home.  If the biomass burning is done in a commercial setting, then all the local/state/federal  (USA at least) air/water/land pollution laws/monitoring/reporting/enforcement procedures kick in.  Burning anything causes some degree of pollution.   While resolving > CO2 problems associated with fossil fuels, burning biomass creates other > pollutants.  A recent article in Science (heard interview with author > on the radio, haven’t seen the article) noted that biomass fuels are > contributing to considerable aerosols due to poor combustion and this > in turn leads to droughts due to its affect on the weather.

Like the burning of over 6,000,000 acres of bio-mass this summer in the US by forest/range fires caused by lightening/arson/carelessness.  Catalytic combustors seem to have dropped out of sight. Probably do to cost and no enforcement action against private people that still use older style inefficeient stoves.

Response:

> > > sun-dried straw could be a good source of energy if the pelletizing is > > properly achieved > What is done to prevent pollution in such combustion? > Nothing, if the combustion is done in a private individual setting such as a > home.

Rather disturbing – we use renewables to clean up the cars and dirty up the houses. >  Burning anything causes some degree of pollution.

But it’s not exactly heavy-duty rocket science to reduce that level of pollution to a small amount. > Like the burning of over 6,000,000 acres of bio-mass this summer in the US > by forest/range fires caused by lightening/arson/carelessness.

Equivalent to 260 sq ft per person of biomass if one billion people use this for fuel.  For comparison purposes, that’s a very small patch of land for renewable biofuels.  Several billion people already use this kind of technology for everyday heating and cooking.  The forest fire is a small, but not insignificant, part of the problem compared to heating and cooking.  Since we can clean up the furnace/kitchen let’s do it. Mike

Response:

> > > What is done to prevent pollution in such combustion? > Nothing, if the combustion is done in a private individual setting such as a > home. > Rather disturbing – we use renewables to clean up the cars and dirty up > the houses.

What renewables (fuels/energy source??)  to clean up the cars? >  Burning anything causes some degree of pollution. > But it’s not exactly heavy-duty rocket science to reduce that level of > pollution to a small amount.

Just takes money and time. Of which both are precious and we are all short of.  Do you suggest that the small minority of the world population finance and thus drastically reduce their standard of living to finance the staggering  majority of poverty and raise their standards by some degree? > Like the burning of over 6,000,000 acres of bio-mass this summer in the US > by forest/range fires caused by lightening/arson/carelessness. > Equivalent to 260 sq ft per person of biomass if one billion people use this > for fuel.

The 6,000,000 *acres* was for the US only,,,,, of which the population is ~275,000,000….. not 1 Billion.  For comparison purposes, that’s a very small patch of land for > renewable biofuels.  Several billion people already use this kind of technology > for everyday heating and cooking.  The forest fire is a small, but not > insignificant, part of the problem compared to heating and cooking.

So true and you have a point… The third world /starving_poor /billions_of_people use burnable ;bio-mass/dung fuels for cooking/heating and their input to the global pollution is staggering.  Do you suggest they stop burning bio-mass for cooking and heating purposes and switch to something cleaner?  Such as solar?

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> > > What is done to prevent pollution in such combustion? > > Nothing, if the combustion is done in a private individual setting such > as a > > home. > Rather disturbing – we use renewables to clean up the cars and dirty up > the houses. > What renewables (fuels/energy source??)  to clean up the cars? > >  Burning anything causes some degree of pollution. > But it’s not exactly heavy-duty rocket science to reduce that level of > pollution to a small amount. > Just takes money and time. Of which both are precious and we are all short > of.  Do you suggest that the small minority of the world population finance > and thus drastically reduce their standard of living to finance the > staggering  majority of poverty and raise their standards by some degree? > > Like the burning of over 6,000,000 acres of bio-mass this summer in the > US > > by forest/range fires caused by lightening/arson/carelessness. > Equivalent to 260 sq ft per person of biomass if one billion people use > this > for fuel. > The 6,000,000 *acres* was for the US only,,,,, of which the population is > ~275,000,000….. not 1 Billion. >  For comparison purposes, that’s a very small patch of land for > renewable biofuels.  Several billion people already use this kind of > technology > for everyday heating and cooking.  The forest fire is a small, but not > insignificant, part of the problem compared to heating and cooking. > So true and you have a point… The third world /starving_poor > /billions_of_people use burnable ;bio-mass/dung fuels for cooking/heating > and their input to the global pollution is staggering.  Do you suggest they > stop burning bio-mass for cooking and heating purposes and switch to > something cleaner?  Such as solar?

Well, solar cookers are available (take about twice as long as conventional) in much of Africa. First step could well be providing wood-efficient stoves rather than 3 stones & cauldron over an open fire – saves scads of time collecting fuel. Plenty of agencies working in 3rd world are already doing this. — May glorious Shamash make his face to shine upon you Gilgamesh of Uruk now residing in the Kingdom of Mercia

Response:

… > Do you suggest they > stop burning bio-mass for cooking and heating purposes and switch to > something cleaner?  Such as solar? … > Well, solar cookers are available (take about twice as long as conventional) > in much of Africa. First step could well be providing wood-efficient stoves > rather than 3 stones & cauldron over an open fire – saves scads of time > collecting fuel. Plenty of agencies working in 3rd world are already doing > this.

Solar cookers don’t have to take twice as long to cook but the faster you want them to cook then the bigger and more complicated they become. They also typically don’t work at night. It isn’t that they couldn’t be designed with thermal storage so that they could operate at night but then they would be bigger and more complicated. Rocket stoves seem to be what you are talking about regarding efficient biofuel cooking. http://www.efn.org/~apro/atrocketpage.html Anthony

Response:

> > Rather disturbing – we use renewables to clean up the cars and dirty up > the houses. > What renewables (fuels/energy source??)  to clean up the cars?

I was speaking in conceptual terms.  The current contribution is negligible, but the desired direction is to generate energy from renewables for cars since it would reduce CO2 and possibly other pollutants. > Just takes money and time. Of which both are precious and we are all short > of.  Do you suggest that the small minority of the world population finance > and thus drastically reduce their standard of living to finance the > staggering  majority of poverty and raise their standards by some degree?

Western countries are hardly short of money – nor are other countries when you get right down to it.  It’s just that we prefer to spend it on defense and on useless trash we assume are luxuries because the poor don’t have them.  A _portion_ of global defense spending would rid the world of many problems if directed on medical research and deployment, clean water, clean energy etc.  We wouldn’t have to drop our standard of living, just our standard of killing. >  For comparison purposes, that’s a very small patch of land for > renewable biofuels.  Several billion people already use this kind of > technology > for everyday heating and cooking.  The forest fire is a small, but not > insignificant, part of the problem compared to heating and cooking. > So true and you have a point… The third world /starving_poor > /billions_of_people use burnable ;bio-mass/dung fuels for cooking/heating > and their input to the global pollution is staggering.  Do you suggest they > stop burning bio-mass for cooking and heating purposes and switch to > something cleaner?  Such as solar?

There have been efforts along those lines – convert the technology by degrees.  Switching from open fires to enclosed combustion (ie simple stove) will improve efficiency even without a change of fuel.  Given the high cost of fuel gathering in some countries that alone is an improvement.  Easier said than done, given income and spending distributions. Mike

Response:

> > Rather disturbing – we use renewables to clean up the cars and dirty up > > the houses. > What renewables (fuels/energy source??)  to clean up the cars? > I was speaking in conceptual terms.  The current contribution is > negligible, but the desired direction is to generate energy from > renewables for cars since it would reduce CO2 and possibly other > pollutants.

If we are speaking in conceptual terms, then let us do away with vehicular modes and think about Star Trek and transporter rooms.  You know, scramble the molecules of the subject matter and beam the stuff to wherever you choose then put the molecules back together. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Just takes money and time. Of which both are precious and we are all short > of.  Do you suggest that the small minority of the world population finance > and thus drastically reduce their standard of living to finance the > staggering  majority of poverty and raise their standards by some degree? > Western countries are hardly short of money – nor are other countries when > you get right down to it.  It’s just that we prefer to spend it on defense > and on useless trash we assume are luxuries because the poor don’t have > them.  A _portion_ of global defense spending would rid the world of many > problems if directed on medical research and deployment, clean water, > clean energy etc.  We wouldn’t have to drop our standard of living, > just our standard of killing.

You and anyone else those chooses can cut an addition check to which ever charity organization to help the third world out..  Intteresting question, what ratio of third world population vs industrial population?  How many additonal people would each of us have to adopt and thus use/divide our income/resource amoung?  Would you care to support another ten folks in your household? We are doing medical research, we are giving billion in aide,  the list may not be as big as you wish but.  Why are we not in a balanced budget.  Why are we in a devicit?  How much does the US for example owe? We have religious and special interest groups that demand and scream for Western Countries to defend the down and out nations.  You want to cut that military spending?  I can kind of agree on this one.  Let one down and out nation whip the crap out of another down and out nation and the Western nations should let it occur.

Response:

Sun dried straw, switchgrass, corn stover, sawdust, beef manure, poultry litter, and many other items can be clean burning, effective and economical biomass fuels in the proper combustion unit. Cornelius A. Van Milligen Kentucky Enrichment Inc

Response:

Question:

>Perhaps using the system will help by improving overall ventilation and >moving stagnant air.

    Good point. I found something that might also be a problem… I’ve only turned the water heater on twice since buying the place. The first time it worked fine, but the next time it didn’t work at all. On inspection I found that it has been leaking, apparently for a while, because it had sunk down into the floor a few inches. While draining it to replace it, I tilted it a bit so the water would all be able to drain out. When I tilted it, it fell through the floor! So now there’s a whole new big job to replace the floor, and then the water heater. But maybe the leaky water heater was enough to provide a moisture level high enough to support the mold problem? If so it might all turn out for the best in the long run, even though it sure is suckin’ at this time.

Response:

We had a small mold problem in our home, thanks to a water leak. In doing a lot of research I discovered that cleanup with plain old bleach is pretty damn effective. Remarkably, bleach straight from the bottle is LESS effective than using it diluted with water at about 1 part bleach to 4 or 5 parts water. Also, it’s much safer to clean up mold while it is a bit damp than waiting for it to fully dry, since the dry spores spread easily. Obviously, wear appropriate masks and protective gear, and dispose of the cleanup materials appropriately. As others have already noted, preventing a recurrence requires cutting off the source of moisture — not an easy task in a boat. You can’t cut off the source of mold, unfortunately, since airborne spores are everywhere. Be cautious about the claims for ozone as a method to control mold. It can work on non-porous surfaces and carpets, but seems much less effective when mold has affected other materials. Also, it can kill the mold without reducing the toxicity of the mold spores and fragments that remain. In heavy concentrations, ozone isn’t great for you and your passengers, either. Alex

Response:

> This is the system I’d check into.  http://www.sterile-aire.com/  You should > get someone to look at your problem though.  You can kill all the mold you > want with these things but if you don’t stop the root of the problem it will > keep coming back.  Root = where is the moisture coming from to allow the > mold to grow.  However, stopping the root problem can get expensive real > fast depending on your situation.  C band UV is the way to go though. > Specifically from the wave lengths 255 to 270. > I’ve posted a couple time in the last few months and it doesn’t seem to be > showing up.  ??  We’ll see. > Jim

I actually had a Sterilaire installed with my new HVAC system a few months ago.  From what I understand, the goal of my unit is to keep mold from growing on the coil and prevent it from being spread via the air ducts.  I agree with others that the key is to eliminate the moisture problem that is causing the mold in the first place.  Best of luck!

Response:

> I actually had a Sterilaire installed with my new HVAC system a few months > ago.  From what I understand, the goal of my unit is to keep mold from > growing on the coil and prevent it from being spread via the air ducts.  I > agree with others that the key is to eliminate the moisture problem that is > causing the mold in the first place.  Best of luck!

What was the cost on that?  Two asthmatics in the house, every little bit helps. Michael — Michael Rothwell 98 ‘Berg FE400 97 Malibu Echelon Oracle/Sql Server DBA/Developer/Web Enabled DB’s HTTP://www.bdbinc.com/

Response:

> What was the cost on that?  Two asthmatics in the house, every little bit helps. > Michael

I’m embarrassed to say I don’t remember.  We replaced *everything* when we bought this house recently.  All the air ducts, furnace and A/C and then added the Sterilaire UV light.  I’m usually a very smart consumer (checking out prices and such), but I’ve had problems previously with mold and my kids are very sensitive to it.  As I said before, I can’t speak to the effectiveness of it, as I can’t say for sure it works.  In my case, I’m assuming it will because I’m beginning with a new system and clean ducts. I’m not sure it would do much if you have old, dirty air ducts filled with mold.  I can say that Sterilaire’s customer service has been excellent.  I had problems with the bulb emitting ozone (they had given me the wrong type of bulb that is supposed to be used for water treatment) and was getting no where with the installer.  I called Sterilaire and they immediately diagnosed the problem, apologized profusely and got me the correct bulb. I would  also recommend considering the installation of a high quality filtration system if you don’t already have one.  They are definitely effective if you have asthmatics in the home.

Response:

>> I actually had a Sterilaire installed with my new HVAC system a few months > ago.  From what I understand, the goal of my unit is to keep mold from > growing on the coil and prevent it from being spread via the air ducts.  I > agree with others that the key is to eliminate the moisture problem that is > causing the mold in the first place.  Best of luck! >What was the cost on that?  Two asthmatics in the house, every little bit helps.

A couple hundred bucks when I last checked. Tom

Response:

>This is the system I’d check into.  http://www.sterile-aire.com/  You should >get someone to look at your problem though.  You can kill all the mold you >want with these things but if you don’t stop the root of the problem it will >keep coming back.  Root = where is the moisture coming from to allow the >mold to grow.  

    I don’t know for sure. It has rained almost every day for the past few months, so there’s bound to be a lot of moisture just from that. Maybe there’s a leak under the house or something? I’ve only had it a few months, and haven’t crawled up under it yet. The water bill is almost nothing though, and the water meter doesn’t move when the water is shut off…I made sure of that due to an incorrect water bill they sent me.     How much does the particular surrounding area have to do with it? I’ve never had a problem like this anywhere else. Some mold would grow on leather or in the bathroom etc, but not on large portions of the walls, and on doors, and all over the place like this. And also, why does it grow on two walls in a room, but not on the other two. Or on only one wall, or on one side of a door but not the other? >However, stopping the root problem can get expensive real >fast depending on your situation.  C band UV is the way to go though. >Specifically from the wave lengths 255 to 270.

    So far I haven’t even used the heating or AC systems, so there has been no distribution or growth from such a source. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->I’ve posted a couple time in the last few months and it doesn’t seem to be >showing up.  ??  We’ll see. >Jim > Hi, > In a Google search I found that these news groups have > discussed the control of mold using UV light. I’m interested > in the best way of doing that, where to get whatever > equipment is needed, and any advice or suggestions. It > grows mostly on my walls and doors. > Thanks for any help! > David

Response:

Perhaps using the system will help by improving overall ventilation and moving stagnant air.

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->This is the system I’d check into.  http://www.sterile-aire.com/  You should >get someone to look at your problem though.  You can kill all the mold you >want with these things but if you don’t stop the root of the problem it will >keep coming back.  Root = where is the moisture coming from to allow the >mold to grow. >     I don’t know for sure. It has rained almost every day for the past few > months, so there’s bound to be a lot of moisture just from that. Maybe > there’s a leak under the house or something? I’ve only had it a few > months, and haven’t crawled up under it yet. The water bill is almost > nothing though, and the water meter doesn’t move when the water > is shut off…I made sure of that due to an incorrect water bill they sent > me. >     How much does the particular surrounding area have to do with > it? I’ve never had a problem like this anywhere else. Some mold would > grow on leather or in the bathroom etc, but not on large portions of the > walls, and on doors, and all over the place like this. And also, why > does it grow on two walls in a room, but not on the other two. Or on > only one wall, or on one side of a door but not the other? >However, stopping the root problem can get expensive real >fast depending on your situation.  C band UV is the way to go though. >Specifically from the wave lengths 255 to 270. >     So far I haven’t even used the heating or AC systems, so there > has been no distribution or growth from such a source. >I’ve posted a couple time in the last few months and it doesn’t seem to be >showing up.  ??  We’ll see. >Jim >> Hi, >> In a Google search I found that these news groups have >> discussed the control of mold using UV light. I’m interested >> in the best way of doing that, where to get whatever >> equipment is needed, and any advice or suggestions. It >> grows mostly on my walls and doors. >> Thanks for any help! >> David

Response:

>Hi, >In a Google search I found that these news groups have >discussed the control of mold using UV light. I’m interested >in the best way of doing that, where to get whatever >equipment is needed, and any advice or suggestions. It >grows mostly on my walls and doors.

if you have a problem with mold you better look into why you have so much moisture. then solve that problem and the mold will go away. — Knight-Toolworks & Custom Planes Custom made wooden planes at reasonable prices See http://www.knight-toolworks.com  For prices and ordering instructions.

Response:

This is the system I’d check into.  http://www.sterile-aire.com/  You should get someone to look at your problem though.  You can kill all the mold you want with these things but if you don’t stop the root of the problem it will keep coming back.  Root = where is the moisture coming from to allow the mold to grow.  However, stopping the root problem can get expensive real fast depending on your situation.  C band UV is the way to go though. Specifically from the wave lengths 255 to 270. I’ve posted a couple time in the last few months and it doesn’t seem to be showing up.  ??  We’ll see. Jim

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Hi, > In a Google search I found that these news groups have > discussed the control of mold using UV light. I’m interested > in the best way of doing that, where to get whatever > equipment is needed, and any advice or suggestions. It > grows mostly on my walls and doors. > Thanks for any help! > David

Response:

> Hi, > In a Google search I found that these news groups have > discussed the control of mold using UV light. I’m interested > in the best way of doing that, where to get whatever > equipment is needed, and any advice or suggestions. It > grows mostly on my walls and doors. > Thanks for any help! > David

If that be the case, your not going to stop it with a UV lamp in the AC system if that is the type you are talking about. A UV-C band lamp kills what passes near it, provided its up to full power, and the bulbs are not old, by either bombarding it with UV radiation, or in the case of viri, scrambling the DNA in the cell..so it cant reproduce. You can look around but if you have a severe mold issue, you need to get a qualified person in there to evaluate, and tell you whats going on. I sell the things..but if you have mold growing on the walls, I would not even think about installing one in your place till you allowed someone that specializes in that to look things over…

Response:

Hi, In a Google search I found that these news groups have discussed the control of mold using UV light. I’m interested in the best way of doing that, where to get whatever equipment is needed, and any advice or suggestions. It grows mostly on my walls and doors. Thanks for any help! David

Response:

Perhaps using the system will help by improving overall ventilation and moving stagnant air.

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->This is the system I’d check into.  http://www.sterile-aire.com/  You should >get someone to look at your problem though.  You can kill all the mold you >want with these things but if you don’t stop the root of the problem it will >keep coming back.  Root = where is the moisture coming from to allow the >mold to grow. >     I don’t know for sure. It has rained almost every day for the past few > months, so there’s bound to be a lot of moisture just from that. Maybe > there’s a leak under the house or something? I’ve only had it a few > months, and haven’t crawled up under it yet. The water bill is almost > nothing though, and the water meter doesn’t move when the water > is shut off…I made sure of that due to an incorrect water bill they sent > me. >     How much does the particular surrounding area have to do with > it? I’ve never had a problem like this anywhere else. Some mold would > grow on leather or in the bathroom etc, but not on large portions of the > walls, and on doors, and all over the place like this. And also, why > does it grow on two walls in a room, but not on the other two. Or on > only one wall, or on one side of a door but not the other? >However, stopping the root problem can get expensive real >fast depending on your situation.  C band UV is the way to go though. >Specifically from the wave lengths 255 to 270. >     So far I haven’t even used the heating or AC systems, so there > has been no distribution or growth from such a source. >I’ve posted a couple time in the last few months and it doesn’t seem to be >showing up.  ??  We’ll see. >Jim >> Hi, >> In a Google search I found that these news groups have >> discussed the control of mold using UV light. I’m interested >> in the best way of doing that, where to get whatever >> equipment is needed, and any advice or suggestions. It >> grows mostly on my walls and doors. >> Thanks for any help! >> David

Response:

>This is the system I’d check into.  http://www.sterile-aire.com/  You should >get someone to look at your problem though.  You can kill all the mold you >want with these things but if you don’t stop the root of the problem it will >keep coming back.  Root = where is the moisture coming from to allow the >mold to grow.  

    I don’t know for sure. It has rained almost every day for the past few months, so there’s bound to be a lot of moisture just from that. Maybe there’s a leak under the house or something? I’ve only had it a few months, and haven’t crawled up under it yet. The water bill is almost nothing though, and the water meter doesn’t move when the water is shut off…I made sure of that due to an incorrect water bill they sent me.     How much does the particular surrounding area have to do with it? I’ve never had a problem like this anywhere else. Some mold would grow on leather or in the bathroom etc, but not on large portions of the walls, and on doors, and all over the place like this. And also, why does it grow on two walls in a room, but not on the other two. Or on only one wall, or on one side of a door but not the other? >However, stopping the root problem can get expensive real >fast depending on your situation.  C band UV is the way to go though. >Specifically from the wave lengths 255 to 270.

    So far I haven’t even used the heating or AC systems, so there has been no distribution or growth from such a source. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->I’ve posted a couple time in the last few months and it doesn’t seem to be >showing up.  ??  We’ll see. >Jim > Hi, > In a Google search I found that these news groups have > discussed the control of mold using UV light. I’m interested > in the best way of doing that, where to get whatever > equipment is needed, and any advice or suggestions. It > grows mostly on my walls and doors. > Thanks for any help! > David

Response:

We had a small mold problem in our home, thanks to a water leak. In doing a lot of research I discovered that cleanup with plain old bleach is pretty damn effective. Remarkably, bleach straight from the bottle is LESS effective than using it diluted with water at about 1 part bleach to 4 or 5 parts water. Also, it’s much safer to clean up mold while it is a bit damp than waiting for it to fully dry, since the dry spores spread easily. Obviously, wear appropriate masks and protective gear, and dispose of the cleanup materials appropriately. As others have already noted, preventing a recurrence requires cutting off the source of moisture — not an easy task in a boat. You can’t cut off the source of mold, unfortunately, since airborne spores are everywhere. Be cautious about the claims for ozone as a method to control mold. It can work on non-porous surfaces and carpets, but seems much less effective when mold has affected other materials. Also, it can kill the mold without reducing the toxicity of the mold spores and fragments that remain. In heavy concentrations, ozone isn’t great for you and your passengers, either. Alex

Response:

>Perhaps using the system will help by improving overall ventilation and >moving stagnant air.

    Good point. I found something that might also be a problem… I’ve only turned the water heater on twice since buying the place. The first time it worked fine, but the next time it didn’t work at all. On inspection I found that it has been leaking, apparently for a while, because it had sunk down into the floor a few inches. While draining it to replace it, I tilted it a bit so the water would all be able to drain out. When I tilted it, it fell through the floor! So now there’s a whole new big job to replace the floor, and then the water heater. But maybe the leaky water heater was enough to provide a moisture level high enough to support the mold problem? If so it might all turn out for the best in the long run, even though it sure is suckin’ at this time.

Response:

>> I actually had a Sterilaire installed with my new HVAC system a few months > ago.  From what I understand, the goal of my unit is to keep mold from > growing on the coil and prevent it from being spread via the air ducts.  I > agree with others that the key is to eliminate the moisture problem that is > causing the mold in the first place.  Best of luck! >What was the cost on that?  Two asthmatics in the house, every little bit helps.

A couple hundred bucks when I last checked. Tom

Response:

This is the system I’d check into.  http://www.sterile-aire.com/  You should get someone to look at your problem though.  You can kill all the mold you want with these things but if you don’t stop the root of the problem it will keep coming back.  Root = where is the moisture coming from to allow the mold to grow.  However, stopping the root problem can get expensive real fast depending on your situation.  C band UV is the way to go though. Specifically from the wave lengths 255 to 270. I’ve posted a couple time in the last few months and it doesn’t seem to be showing up.  ??  We’ll see. Jim

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Hi, > In a Google search I found that these news groups have > discussed the control of mold using UV light. I’m interested > in the best way of doing that, where to get whatever > equipment is needed, and any advice or suggestions. It > grows mostly on my walls and doors. > Thanks for any help! > David

Response:

> This is the system I’d check into.  http://www.sterile-aire.com/  You should > get someone to look at your problem though.  You can kill all the mold you > want with these things but if you don’t stop the root of the problem it will > keep coming back.  Root = where is the moisture coming from to allow the > mold to grow.  However, stopping the root problem can get expensive real > fast depending on your situation.  C band UV is the way to go though. > Specifically from the wave lengths 255 to 270. > I’ve posted a couple time in the last few months and it doesn’t seem to be > showing up.  ??  We’ll see. > Jim

I actually had a Sterilaire installed with my new HVAC system a few months ago.  From what I understand, the goal of my unit is to keep mold from growing on the coil and prevent it from being spread via the air ducts.  I agree with others that the key is to eliminate the moisture problem that is causing the mold in the first place.  Best of luck!

Response:

> I actually had a Sterilaire installed with my new HVAC system a few months > ago.  From what I understand, the goal of my unit is to keep mold from > growing on the coil and prevent it from being spread via the air ducts.  I > agree with others that the key is to eliminate the moisture problem that is > causing the mold in the first place.  Best of luck!

What was the cost on that?  Two asthmatics in the house, every little bit helps. Michael — Michael Rothwell 98 ‘Berg FE400 97 Malibu Echelon Oracle/Sql Server DBA/Developer/Web Enabled DB’s HTTP://www.bdbinc.com/

Response:

> What was the cost on that?  Two asthmatics in the house, every little bit helps. > Michael

I’m embarrassed to say I don’t remember.  We replaced *everything* when we bought this house recently.  All the air ducts, furnace and A/C and then added the Sterilaire UV light.  I’m usually a very smart consumer (checking out prices and such), but I’ve had problems previously with mold and my kids are very sensitive to it.  As I said before, I can’t speak to the effectiveness of it, as I can’t say for sure it works.  In my case, I’m assuming it will because I’m beginning with a new system and clean ducts. I’m not sure it would do much if you have old, dirty air ducts filled with mold.  I can say that Sterilaire’s customer service has been excellent.  I had problems with the bulb emitting ozone (they had given me the wrong type of bulb that is supposed to be used for water treatment) and was getting no where with the installer.  I called Sterilaire and they immediately diagnosed the problem, apologized profusely and got me the correct bulb. I would  also recommend considering the installation of a high quality filtration system if you don’t already have one.  They are definitely effective if you have asthmatics in the home.

Response:

> Hi, > In a Google search I found that these news groups have > discussed the control of mold using UV light. I’m interested > in the best way of doing that, where to get whatever > equipment is needed, and any advice or suggestions. It > grows mostly on my walls and doors. > Thanks for any help! > David

If that be the case, your not going to stop it with a UV lamp in the AC system if that is the type you are talking about. A UV-C band lamp kills what passes near it, provided its up to full power, and the bulbs are not old, by either bombarding it with UV radiation, or in the case of viri, scrambling the DNA in the cell..so it cant reproduce. You can look around but if you have a severe mold issue, you need to get a qualified person in there to evaluate, and tell you whats going on. I sell the things..but if you have mold growing on the walls, I would not even think about installing one in your place till you allowed someone that specializes in that to look things over…

Response:

> Hi, > In a Google search I found that these news groups have > discussed the control of mold using UV light. I’m interested > in the best way of doing that, where to get whatever > equipment is needed, and any advice or suggestions. It > grows mostly on my walls and doors. > Thanks for any help! > David

<Delete multi-cross-posts> UV-C lamps will kill molds by genetically altering cell structure. They will also kill all other living things in the environment. And, you can’t look at the light source. Do a web search for UV – mold. The UV may damage finishes within the interior. Ozone has *not* been proven of any value against mold, despite some claims by mfr’s.  It can help with odor control. Ozone is, however, hazardous to health as it is a lung irritant. Here are some sources where you can buy UV lamps: http://www.sharperimagebest.com/si922.html http://www.brite-lite.com/UsShop/Publish/vindex.htm?cat169.htm http://www.light-sources.com/ You may have to supply ballasts and lamp holders. Look for ones that supply only UV-C emission without any ozone. Note that I am not advocating use of a UV source in living space! All that said, the long-term solution is to make the environment unfriendly to mold growth by reducing humidity levels to ~50%. Jim

Response:

Hi, In a Google search I found that these news groups have discussed the control of mold using UV light. I’m interested in the best way of doing that, where to get whatever equipment is needed, and any advice or suggestions. It grows mostly on my walls and doors. Thanks for any help! David

Response:

Perhaps using the system will help by improving overall ventilation and moving stagnant air.

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->This is the system I’d check into.  http://www.sterile-aire.com/  You should >get someone to look at your problem though.  You can kill all the mold you >want with these things but if you don’t stop the root of the problem it will >keep coming back.  Root = where is the moisture coming from to allow the >mold to grow. >     I don’t know for sure. It has rained almost every day for the past few > months, so there’s bound to be a lot of moisture just from that. Maybe > there’s a leak under the house or something? I’ve only had it a few > months, and haven’t crawled up under it yet. The water bill is almost > nothing though, and the water meter doesn’t move when the water > is shut off…I made sure of that due to an incorrect water bill they sent > me. >     How much does the particular surrounding area have to do with > it? I’ve never had a problem like this anywhere else. Some mold would > grow on leather or in the bathroom etc, but not on large portions of the > walls, and on doors, and all over the place like this. And also, why > does it grow on two walls in a room, but not on the other two. Or on > only one wall, or on one side of a door but not the other? >However, stopping the root problem can get expensive real >fast depending on your situation.  C band UV is the way to go though. >Specifically from the wave lengths 255 to 270. >     So far I haven’t even used the heating or AC systems, so there > has been no distribution or growth from such a source. >I’ve posted a couple time in the last few months and it doesn’t seem to be >showing up.  ??  We’ll see. >Jim >> Hi, >> In a Google search I found that these news groups have >> discussed the control of mold using UV light. I’m interested >> in the best way of doing that, where to get whatever >> equipment is needed, and any advice or suggestions. It >> grows mostly on my walls and doors. >> Thanks for any help! >> David

Response:

>This is the system I’d check into.  http://www.sterile-aire.com/  You should >get someone to look at your problem though.  You can kill all the mold you >want with these things but if you don’t stop the root of the problem it will >keep coming back.  Root = where is the moisture coming from to allow the >mold to grow.  

    I don’t know for sure. It has rained almost every day for the past few months, so there’s bound to be a lot of moisture just from that. Maybe there’s a leak under the house or something? I’ve only had it a few months, and haven’t crawled up under it yet. The water bill is almost nothing though, and the water meter doesn’t move when the water is shut off…I made sure of that due to an incorrect water bill they sent me.     How much does the particular surrounding area have to do with it? I’ve never had a problem like this anywhere else. Some mold would grow on leather or in the bathroom etc, but not on large portions of the walls, and on doors, and all over the place like this. And also, why does it grow on two walls in a room, but not on the other two. Or on only one wall, or on one side of a door but not the other? >However, stopping the root problem can get expensive real >fast depending on your situation.  C band UV is the way to go though. >Specifically from the wave lengths 255 to 270.

    So far I haven’t even used the heating or AC systems, so there has been no distribution or growth from such a source. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->I’ve posted a couple time in the last few months and it doesn’t seem to be >showing up.  ??  We’ll see. >Jim > Hi, > In a Google search I found that these news groups have > discussed the control of mold using UV light. I’m interested > in the best way of doing that, where to get whatever > equipment is needed, and any advice or suggestions. It > grows mostly on my walls and doors. > Thanks for any help! > David

Response:

We had a small mold problem in our home, thanks to a water leak. In doing a lot of research I discovered that cleanup with plain old bleach is pretty damn effective. Remarkably, bleach straight from the bottle is LESS effective than using it diluted with water at about 1 part bleach to 4 or 5 parts water. Also, it’s much safer to clean up mold while it is a bit damp than waiting for it to fully dry, since the dry spores spread easily. Obviously, wear appropriate masks and protective gear, and dispose of the cleanup materials appropriately. As others have already noted, preventing a recurrence requires cutting off the source of moisture — not an easy task in a boat. You can’t cut off the source of mold, unfortunately, since airborne spores are everywhere. Be cautious about the claims for ozone as a method to control mold. It can work on non-porous surfaces and carpets, but seems much less effective when mold has affected other materials. Also, it can kill the mold without reducing the toxicity of the mold spores and fragments that remain. In heavy concentrations, ozone isn’t great for you and your passengers, either. Alex

Response:

>Perhaps using the system will help by improving overall ventilation and >moving stagnant air.

    Good point. I found something that might also be a problem… I’ve only turned the water heater on twice since buying the place. The first time it worked fine, but the next time it didn’t work at all. On inspection I found that it has been leaking, apparently for a while, because it had sunk down into the floor a few inches. While draining it to replace it, I tilted it a bit so the water would all be able to drain out. When I tilted it, it fell through the floor! So now there’s a whole new big job to replace the floor, and then the water heater. But maybe the leaky water heater was enough to provide a moisture level high enough to support the mold problem? If so it might all turn out for the best in the long run, even though it sure is suckin’ at this time.

Response:

>> I actually had a Sterilaire installed with my new HVAC system a few months > ago.  From what I understand, the goal of my unit is to keep mold from > growing on the coil and prevent it from being spread via the air ducts.  I > agree with others that the key is to eliminate the moisture problem that is > causing the mold in the first place.  Best of luck! >What was the cost on that?  Two asthmatics in the house, every little bit helps.

A couple hundred bucks when I last checked. Tom

Response:

This is the system I’d check into.  http://www.sterile-aire.com/  You should get someone to look at your problem though.  You can kill all the mold you want with these things but if you don’t stop the root of the problem it will keep coming back.  Root = where is the moisture coming from to allow the mold to grow.  However, stopping the root problem can get expensive real fast depending on your situation.  C band UV is the way to go though. Specifically from the wave lengths 255 to 270. I’ve posted a couple time in the last few months and it doesn’t seem to be showing up.  ??  We’ll see. Jim

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Hi, > In a Google search I found that these news groups have > discussed the control of mold using UV light. I’m interested > in the best way of doing that, where to get whatever > equipment is needed, and any advice or suggestions. It > grows mostly on my walls and doors. > Thanks for any help! > David

Response:

> This is the system I’d check into.  http://www.sterile-aire.com/  You should > get someone to look at your problem though.  You can kill all the mold you > want with these things but if you don’t stop the root of the problem it will > keep coming back.  Root = where is the moisture coming from to allow the > mold to grow.  However, stopping the root problem can get expensive real > fast depending on your situation.  C band UV is the way to go though. > Specifically from the wave lengths 255 to 270. > I’ve posted a couple time in the last few months and it doesn’t seem to be > showing up.  ??  We’ll see. > Jim

I actually had a Sterilaire installed with my new HVAC system a few months ago.  From what I understand, the goal of my unit is to keep mold from growing on the coil and prevent it from being spread via the air ducts.  I agree with others that the key is to eliminate the moisture problem that is causing the mold in the first place.  Best of luck!

Response:

> I actually had a Sterilaire installed with my new HVAC system a few months > ago.  From what I understand, the goal of my unit is to keep mold from > growing on the coil and prevent it from being spread via the air ducts.  I > agree with others that the key is to eliminate the moisture problem that is > causing the mold in the first place.  Best of luck!

What was the cost on that?  Two asthmatics in the house, every little bit helps. Michael — Michael Rothwell 98 ‘Berg FE400 97 Malibu Echelon Oracle/Sql Server DBA/Developer/Web Enabled DB’s HTTP://www.bdbinc.com/

Response:

> What was the cost on that?  Two asthmatics in the house, every little bit helps. > Michael

I’m embarrassed to say I don’t remember.  We replaced *everything* when we bought this house recently.  All the air ducts, furnace and A/C and then added the Sterilaire UV light.  I’m usually a very smart consumer (checking out prices and such), but I’ve had problems previously with mold and my kids are very sensitive to it.  As I said before, I can’t speak to the effectiveness of it, as I can’t say for sure it works.  In my case, I’m assuming it will because I’m beginning with a new system and clean ducts. I’m not sure it would do much if you have old, dirty air ducts filled with mold.  I can say that Sterilaire’s customer service has been excellent.  I had problems with the bulb emitting ozone (they had given me the wrong type of bulb that is supposed to be used for water treatment) and was getting no where with the installer.  I called Sterilaire and they immediately diagnosed the problem, apologized profusely and got me the correct bulb. I would  also recommend considering the installation of a high quality filtration system if you don’t already have one.  They are definitely effective if you have asthmatics in the home.

Response:

> Hi, > In a Google search I found that these news groups have > discussed the control of mold using UV light. I’m interested > in the best way of doing that, where to get whatever > equipment is needed, and any advice or suggestions. It > grows mostly on my walls and doors. > Thanks for any help! > David

If that be the case, your not going to stop it with a UV lamp in the AC system if that is the type you are talking about. A UV-C band lamp kills what passes near it, provided its up to full power, and the bulbs are not old, by either bombarding it with UV radiation, or in the case of viri, scrambling the DNA in the cell..so it cant reproduce. You can look around but if you have a severe mold issue, you need to get a qualified person in there to evaluate, and tell you whats going on. I sell the things..but if you have mold growing on the walls, I would not even think about installing one in your place till you allowed someone that specializes in that to look things over…

Response:

> Hi, > In a Google search I found that these news groups have > discussed the control of mold using UV light. I’m interested > in the best way of doing that, where to get whatever > equipment is needed, and any advice or suggestions. It > grows mostly on my walls and doors. > Thanks for any help! > David

<Delete multi-cross-posts> UV-C lamps will kill molds by genetically altering cell structure. They will also kill all other living things in the environment. And, you can’t look at the light source. Do a web search for UV – mold. The UV may damage finishes within the interior. Ozone has *not* been proven of any value against mold, despite some claims by mfr’s.  It can help with odor control. Ozone is, however, hazardous to health as it is a lung irritant. Here are some sources where you can buy UV lamps: http://www.sharperimagebest.com/si922.html http://www.brite-lite.com/UsShop/Publish/vindex.htm?cat169.htm http://www.light-sources.com/ You may have to supply ballasts and lamp holders. Look for ones that supply only UV-C emission without any ozone. Note that I am not advocating use of a UV source in living space! All that said, the long-term solution is to make the environment unfriendly to mold growth by reducing humidity levels to ~50%. Jim

Response:

Hi, In a Google search I found that these news groups have discussed the control of mold using UV light. I’m interested in the best way of doing that, where to get whatever equipment is needed, and any advice or suggestions. It grows mostly on my walls and doors. Thanks for any help! David

Response: