Question:

> > …Or not connected to the stereo jack properly, and/or not shielded well. > i took in the miller jazz bass & the repair guy said it was shielded well > enough… > …the basses are a marcus miller jazz bass and a Schecter Diamond Series. > I realize neither is much compared to many of the basses on here…but > shouldn’t $500 buy a usable bass?  should i not bother with an active bass > at that price?  

Take my word for it, you can spend a LOT more than $500 and still have a bass full of hum and noise. I just got a G&L Tribute for $600 and it took weeks to get the hum and noise out of it! This can happen with ANY bass not just active ones. Face it you’ll have to bite the bullet and try to find the problems. Start with the noise. is it hum? Is it hiss? is it crackly (sounds like "static")? Each one is a separate problem. Start with hum. Does it change when you touch the bridge or strings with your hand? Does it change when you take the bass and move it’s orientation around?  Does it change as you move about the room on a long cord? The first is a shielding problem. The second is a humbucking (or more exactly lack of it) problem. And the third means somehow there are strong fields in the room being generated by SOMETHING. IF you have hiss. Does it get real bad when you turn up the treble knob on the bass? Does it always seem to be there no matter? Does it go away if you cut off your tweeter or turn down EQ on the amp? All these give hints as to where the noisy part is. Typically, the problem is a bad IC in the preamp or amp. You may need help to find which one. Crackly sounds usually mean loose connections. That could be a loose wire or a bad connector. wiggling things can sometimes isolate the problem. Since you have two basses that are full of problems, you may have a bad noise source in your location. Radio stations etc. can often cause weird effects in electronics. IF your amp is immune, passive basses won’t cause problems, but active ones can cause trouble. Soldering a 100 pf capacitor (That’s a TINY one!) across the guitar jack can often help shunt our RF noise. Bottom line here is that Active basses are not usually any different noise-wise from passive, BUT since there are added parts, those parts give you that much more chance of picking up noise in some manner. But those problems can be solved and I find the added convenience of having "real" EQ at the bass instead of a "toy" tone control to be worth the effort. Good Luck Benj

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> > …Or not connected to the stereo jack properly, and/or not shielded well. > i took in the miller jazz bass & the repair guy said it was shielded well > enough… > …the basses are a marcus miller jazz bass and a Schecter Diamond Series. > I realize neither is much compared to many of the basses on here…but > shouldn’t $500 buy a usable bass?  should i not bother with an active bass > at that price?

A couple of simple things to consider if you have not already.  TV’s and computer monitors will generate a LOT of noise.  Dimmer switches will cause this also.  Try plugging your amp into different power source around the house.  I have one outlet in my house that is particularly noisy.  It may be that it is on the same curcuit as several kitchen appliances.

Response:

>I’ve recently bought a couple active-pickup basses (or at least one on-board >preamp & one active pickup bass each) and they’ve both had some lousy hums, >screeches, and noises going on…i’ve never had active pickups before, but >a bass-playing friend of mine recommended, so my question is…are active >pickups known to be more noisy?!?  i actually thought they had _less_ hum >and noise.  

They do, unless they’re cheap.  What kind are they?

Response:

…Or not connected to the stereo jack properly, and/or not shielded well. — Learning funk bass? visit www.js3jazz.com/store.htm "I am quite sure now that often, very often, in matters concerning religion and politics a man’s reasoning powers are not above the monkey’s." – Mark Twain

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->I’ve recently bought a couple active-pickup basses (or at least one on-board >preamp & one active pickup bass each) and they’ve both had some lousy hums, >screeches, and noises going on…i’ve never had active pickups before, but >a bass-playing friend of mine recommended, so my question is…are active >pickups known to be more noisy?!?  i actually thought they had _less_ hum >and noise. > They do, unless they’re cheap.  What kind are they?

Response:

> …Or not connected to the stereo jack properly, and/or not shielded well.

i took in the miller jazz bass & the repair guy said it was shielded well enough… …the basses are a marcus miller jazz bass and a Schecter Diamond Series. I realize neither is much compared to many of the basses on here…but shouldn’t $500 buy a usable bass?  should i not bother with an active bass at that price?   thanks… — "Every generalization is dangerous, including this one."         –Mark Twain

Response:

I’ve recently bought a couple active-pickup basses (or at least one on-board preamp & one active pickup bass each) and they’ve both had some lousy hums, screeches, and noises going on…i’ve never had active pickups before, but a bass-playing friend of mine recommended, so my question is…are active pickups known to be more noisy?!?  i actually thought they had _less_ hum and noise.   — "Every generalization is dangerous, including this one."         –Mark Twain

Response:

Question:

> What makes the Fender vibe so immutable?

Fender is the "default" bass. You never have to explain to anybody why you bought a Fender. People know exactly what to expect when you plug it in. I would not necessarily say that I would only buy a Fender, but I would only buy a bass that closely resembles a Fender.

Response:

> What makes the Fender vibe so > immutable?

Since they stopped puttin’ the mutes on them at the factory? or… Fender vibe?  Never played that model. —    O< "There is nothing- absolutely nothing- half so much worth doing /()    as simply messing about in boats."   ~Wind In The Willows    ^^                                                      Slidell, LA

Response:

They have the same timeless sound & vibe as a Hammond B3 organ and Rhodes/ Wurlitzer electric pianos!  Groove machines!!!                                 Aloha, Jerry

Response:

Well, for my taste and personal opinion, that’s definitely a point! Philippe

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> They have the same timeless sound & vibe as a Hammond B3 organ and Rhodes/ > Wurlitzer electric pianos!  Groove machines!!! >                                Aloha, Jerry

Response:

Was the Rumblefish a used bass?  Any idea how much they wanted for it? I’ve been looking for one of those for a while now. Please let me know.  I appreciate it. Bob

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> I was at the Guitar Center in Grand Rapids yesterday which is a real treat > for me.  I live in an area where there aren’t any *real* guitar stores so I > was in heaven.  I had a chance to play a 4001, Jazz, Precision, and several > others (even a Rumblefish!). Anyways, the bass I kept coming back to was the > standard Jazz.  I can’t explain why, it just felt and sounded right. > Exactly right.  I currently play a Cort Curbow 5 which I think is a great > sounding bass with the Bartolini p.u. and active e.q.  The Jazz was even > better.  The b,e,and a string on my Cort sound great but the d and g string > are kinda weak.  The Jazz had great sound on all strings all the way up the > fretboard.  Unfortunately I was not able to take that one home with me, > maybe next time! > Mrbill > Fender has got to be the only brand of bass or guitar that the more > beaten, worn –even trashed– it looks, the more people seem to love > it and desire it.  Rightly or wrongly, this is not true of any other > brand that I know of, where anything less than mint can REALLY make a > difference in even being able to sell it at all, no matter how good it > is.  Fender’s drawbacks have been debated ad nauseum, but we can also > agree that they can sound and play rather nice once in awhile, not to > mention that they form the basis which most competing brands build > upon and are subsequently compared to.  Not many think that they are > anywhere near the top of any range in terms of absolute quality, > materials, craftsmanship, or style.  So, what is it about these > instruments that makes them acceptable in almost any condition and/or > modified to almost any degree; and unplayed, perfect condition isn’t > necessarily a desirable thing?  What makes the Fender vibe so > immutable? > Edward G.

Response:

>Also the more an instrument is played the more harmonic the wood > becomes as it is exposed to string vibration, this is especially true > of violins, cellos etc.

Forgive the selective quote, but is this really true? A genuine question – I have never considered this before, but love the idea as a romantic notion. But – how does this work physically? Cheers Julian — Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).

Response:

It works only if you know the correct incantation. <G> Ed Cregger

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->Also the more an instrument is played the more harmonic the wood > becomes as it is exposed to string vibration, this is especially true > of violins, cellos etc. > Forgive the selective quote, but is this really true? A genuine question – I > have never considered this before, but love the idea as a romantic notion. > But – how does this work physically? > Cheers > Julian > — > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).

Response:

> I think what you’re saying is that the older we get, the better we were. > Thump

There was a time when if you showed up at an audition, whether big or small, with anything but a Fender Bass, you were considered a rank, amateur, wannabe. Even then there were more expensive instruments available, but for earning one’s bread week after week, there was no competition. The more expensive instruments were pretty show pieces and could not, would not, hold up to constant playing. That is not my opinion. It is a fact. I owned Gibson and Rickenbacker too. They couldn’t cut it in the every day working world. Today, things certainly are different. That is the way it is supposed to be. Some of the dudes here look down their noses at folks that play or played in local bands. I haven’t seen any signatures here of really heavy weight bass players since I have been posting. To me, there isn’t one whits worth of difference between people with a high opinion of themselves now, or from the past. We all live in the little universe that is contained within our skulls. If it makes some of the snots feel better to think that they are tremendously hot shit, well – maybe they need to. The only difference between a dude and an old fart is time. That’s all. Just time. Your turn is coming. If you can manage to stay alive long enough, that is. I have my doubts about some of you. But, truthfully, I wish all of you long and happy lives. Ed Cregger

Response:

<<And frankly, if you think you *need* some multi-thousand-dollar exotic-wood nine-string bass with more onboard electronics than a heart-lung machine to get the sound you want, maybe some time with a beat-up old Fender would do you some good.>> (DGDevin) Then again, there are people who have tried Fenders and prefer to play something else. I have yet to play a Fender that I like. That doesn’t mean they suck – I just don’t like them. My band’s site: www.strongerthandirt.com

Response:

Henry? why don’t you follow the harley that Andrew Hines is driving (just like everyone else is trying to…) http://www.nhra.com/stats/prostockbike_top50.html and you thought harleys were slow? try 191 mph to win last weekend or you could ask the runner up who got a good look at Andrew’s tailight in the finals. BTW harley is in 1st (Hines) and 3rd (Tonglet) in the points. Maybe when all is said and done you folks who like to pick on HD’s will go back to picking you ass instead… o&o SC

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> the question was… > *what makes a harley sound so good?* > ans THE LOW END RUMBLE > You know how to get cheap Harley Davidson’s spare parts ? > Just follow one. > ARF !

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->Henry? >why don’t you follow the harley that Andrew Hines is driving (just like >everyone else is trying to…) >http://www.nhra.com/stats/prostockbike_top50.html >and you thought harleys were slow? try 191 mph to win last weekend >or you could ask the runner up who got a good look at Andrew’s tailight in >the finals. >BTW harley is in 1st (Hines) and 3rd (Tonglet) in the points. >Maybe when all is said and done you folks who like to pick on HD’s will go >back to picking you ass instead… >o&o >SC

Someone doesn’t have a very good sense of humor …. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> > the question was… > > *what makes a harley sound so good?* > > ans THE LOW END RUMBLE > You know how to get cheap Harley Davidson’s spare parts ? > Just follow one. > ARF !

Response:

> the question was… > *what makes a harley sound so good?* > ans THE LOW END RUMBLE

You know how to get cheap Harley Davidson’s spare parts ? Just follow one. ARF ! — Henry! Q. Why do some bands even have bass players? A. To translate for the drummer. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> o&o > SC > Fenders somehow fit into all that.  I forget how.  Harley-Davidsons, too. > I > forget, what was the question again?

Response:

> Fender has got to be the only brand of bass or guitar that the more > beaten, worn –even trashed– it looks, the more people seem to love > it and desire it.

It’s history.  Whatever kind of music you like, if there was an electric bass onstage when you first started to like it, odds are it was a Fender. And in a world in which much of what we buy is designed to be disposable, it’s reassuring to own something that looks like it was built to last, and a battle-scarred Fender looks like something you can pass down to your kids. People seem to be turning back to older designs in many areas, look at some of the cars on the road these days, eg. the PT Cruiser, or the new Jaguar, or the retro-look phones, kitchen appliances etc., people want stuff that looks like the built-to-last products they remember from their youth. And frankly, if you think you *need* some multi-thousand-dollar exotic-wood nine-string bass with more onboard electronics than a heart-lung machine to get the sound you want, maybe some time with a beat-up old Fender would do you some good.

Response:

Yeah, and Rolls-Royce Merlins, too.  Merlins, Harleys and Fenders. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> the question was… > *what makes a harley sound so good?* > ans THE LOW END RUMBLE > Fenders somehow fit into all that.  I forget how.  Harley-Davidsons, too. > I > forget, what was the question again?

Response:

I think what you’re saying is that the older we get, the better we were. Thump

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Fender has got to be the only brand of bass or guitar that the more > beaten, worn –even trashed– it looks, the more people seem to love > it and desire it.  Rightly or wrongly, this is not true of any other > brand that I know of, where anything less than mint can REALLY make a > difference in even being able to sell it at all, no matter how good it > is.  Fender’s drawbacks have been debated ad nauseum, but we can also > agree that they can sound and play rather nice once in awhile, not to > mention that they form the basis which most competing brands build > upon and are subsequently compared to.  Not many think that they are > anywhere near the top of any range in terms of absolute quality, > materials, craftsmanship, or style.  So, what is it about these > instruments that makes them acceptable in almost any condition and/or > modified to almost any degree; and unplayed, perfect condition isn’t > necessarily a desirable thing?  What makes the Fender vibe so > immutable? > The largest segment of the musical-instrument-buying population is amateurs, > such as guys who pick up a bass just to futz around with, or maybe put > together some kind of little garage band, or play along with the kids, or > whatever.  A lot of those guys are older, and years ago might have had their > own little band that played high-school dances and whatnot.  Back then, > Fenders really were about the best basses you could buy, that’s what > everyone aspired to.  Nowadays, when they wax nostalgic, they think back to > the days when their little wedding band was the biggest thing ever to come > out of East Podunk, and they’ve got faded, yellowed old photos to prove it. > They’re all playing Fenders, or at least, in their mind’s eye, they’re all > playing Fenders.  Lately, there’s been a perfect example of what I’m > referring to here in this group… > <thinking> > Trotting out photos of some little band back in 1965, playing someone’s > wedding, when we were the biggest, baddest bass players for blocks around, > and getting all weepy over Fenders — as we get older, our past exploits > become ever more grandiose, our experiences are more and more heroic, and by > virtue of our age and foggy memories alone, we become the untouchable > keepers of the flame, unquestionable, able to utter pronouncements with the > weight of God’s own voice, when in reality the biggest gig we ever played > was the Big Flats Junior High School Spring Dance in 1965… > Fenders somehow fit into all that.  I forget how.  Harley-Davidsons, too. I > forget, what was the question again?

Response:

> Fender has got to be the only brand of bass or guitar that the more > beaten, worn –even trashed– it looks, the more people seem to love > it and desire it.  Rightly or wrongly, this is not true of any other > brand that I know of, where anything less than mint can REALLY make a > difference in even being able to sell it at all, no matter how good it > is.  Fender’s drawbacks have been debated ad nauseum, but we can also > agree that they can sound and play rather nice once in awhile, not to > mention that they form the basis which most competing brands build > upon and are subsequently compared to.  Not many think that they are > anywhere near the top of any range in terms of absolute quality, > materials, craftsmanship, or style.  So, what is it about these > instruments that makes them acceptable in almost any condition and/or > modified to almost any degree; and unplayed, perfect condition isn’t > necessarily a desirable thing?  What makes the Fender vibe so > immutable?

The largest segment of the musical-instrument-buying population is amateurs, such as guys who pick up a bass just to futz around with, or maybe put together some kind of little garage band, or play along with the kids, or whatever.  A lot of those guys are older, and years ago might have had their own little band that played high-school dances and whatnot.  Back then, Fenders really were about the best basses you could buy, that’s what everyone aspired to.  Nowadays, when they wax nostalgic, they think back to the days when their little wedding band was the biggest thing ever to come out of East Podunk, and they’ve got faded, yellowed old photos to prove it. They’re all playing Fenders, or at least, in their mind’s eye, they’re all playing Fenders.  Lately, there’s been a perfect example of what I’m referring to here in this group… <thinking> Trotting out photos of some little band back in 1965, playing someone’s wedding, when we were the biggest, baddest bass players for blocks around, and getting all weepy over Fenders — as we get older, our past exploits become ever more grandiose, our experiences are more and more heroic, and by virtue of our age and foggy memories alone, we become the untouchable keepers of the flame, unquestionable, able to utter pronouncements with the weight of God’s own voice, when in reality the biggest gig we ever played was the Big Flats Junior High School Spring Dance in 1965… Fenders somehow fit into all that.  I forget how.  Harley-Davidsons, too.  I forget, what was the question again?

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Fender has got to be the only brand of bass or guitar that the more > beaten, worn –even trashed– it looks, the more people seem to love > it and desire it.  Rightly or wrongly, this is not true of any other > brand that I know of, where anything less than mint can REALLY make a > difference in even being able to sell it at all, no matter how good it > is.  Fender’s drawbacks have been debated ad nauseum, but we can also > agree that they can sound and play rather nice once in awhile, not to > mention that they form the basis which most competing brands build > upon and are subsequently compared to.  Not many think that they are > anywhere near the top of any range in terms of absolute quality, > materials, craftsmanship, or style.  So, what is it about these > instruments that makes them acceptable in almost any condition and/or > modified to almost any degree; and unplayed, perfect condition isn’t > necessarily a desirable thing?  What makes the Fender vibe so > immutable? > Edward G.

Fender instruments are working instruments. They are designed to hold up to constant use, night after night after night. One knows when buying a beat up/well worn Fender instrument that it has probably been played many a night in front of many people and in many different places. The respect we feel for a well worn Fender instrument translates to adoration. At least that is how I feel about it. Ed Cregger

Response:

I think that a possible explaination is the more worn an instrument is the more that it was played, if it was played alot then it must sound good. Also the more an instrument is played the more harmonic the wood becomes as it is exposed to string vibration, this is especially true of violins, cellos etc. And I definitely think that some people feel if an instrument  looks broken it that it gives them more "credibility" as a player. I’ve never owned a Fender or a Fender copy they are not my cup of tea but I have witnessed the phenominon that you have described. Old Fenders are like vintage muscle cars, no matter how beat to shit they are they still look cool (maybe cooler even!)

Response:

the question was… *what makes a harley sound so good?* ans THE LOW END RUMBLE o&o SC

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Fenders somehow fit into all that.  I forget how.  Harley-Davidsons, too. I > forget, what was the question again?

Response:

> 1) They have been around the longest in the music biz > 2) They sound great!

Never said they didn’t… Looking forward to my 4th Ibanez… cb

Response:

I was at the Guitar Center in Grand Rapids yesterday which is a real treat for me.  I live in an area where there aren’t any *real* guitar stores so I was in heaven.  I had a chance to play a 4001, Jazz, Precision, and several others (even a Rumblefish!). Anyways, the bass I kept coming back to was the standard Jazz.  I can’t explain why, it just felt and sounded right. Exactly right.  I currently play a Cort Curbow 5 which I think is a great sounding bass with the Bartolini p.u. and active e.q.  The Jazz was even better.  The b,e,and a string on my Cort sound great but the d and g string are kinda weak.  The Jazz had great sound on all strings all the way up the fretboard.  Unfortunately I was not able to take that one home with me, maybe next time! Mrbill

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Fender has got to be the only brand of bass or guitar that the more > beaten, worn –even trashed– it looks, the more people seem to love > it and desire it.  Rightly or wrongly, this is not true of any other > brand that I know of, where anything less than mint can REALLY make a > difference in even being able to sell it at all, no matter how good it > is.  Fender’s drawbacks have been debated ad nauseum, but we can also > agree that they can sound and play rather nice once in awhile, not to > mention that they form the basis which most competing brands build > upon and are subsequently compared to.  Not many think that they are > anywhere near the top of any range in terms of absolute quality, > materials, craftsmanship, or style.  So, what is it about these > instruments that makes them acceptable in almost any condition and/or > modified to almost any degree; and unplayed, perfect condition isn’t > necessarily a desirable thing?  What makes the Fender vibe so > immutable? > Edward G.

Response:

1) They have been around the longest in the music biz 2) They sound great!

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Fender has got to be the only brand of bass or guitar that the more > beaten, worn –even trashed– it looks, the more people seem to love > it and desire it.  Rightly or wrongly, this is not true of any other > brand that I know of, where anything less than mint can REALLY make a > difference in even being able to sell it at all, no matter how good it > is.  Fender’s drawbacks have been debated ad nauseum, but we can also > agree that they can sound and play rather nice once in awhile, not to > mention that they form the basis which most competing brands build > upon and are subsequently compared to.  Not many think that they are > anywhere near the top of any range in terms of absolute quality, > materials, craftsmanship, or style.  So, what is it about these > instruments that makes them acceptable in almost any condition and/or > modified to almost any degree; and unplayed, perfect condition isn’t > necessarily a desirable thing?  What makes the Fender vibe so > immutable? > Edward G. > Unfortunately, no matter how many times you post this, it won’t make it > sound any better. > cb

Response:

Fender has got to be the only brand of bass or guitar that the more beaten, worn –even trashed– it looks, the more people seem to love it and desire it.  Rightly or wrongly, this is not true of any other brand that I know of, where anything less than mint can REALLY make a difference in even being able to sell it at all, no matter how good it is.  Fender’s drawbacks have been debated ad nauseum, but we can also agree that they can sound and play rather nice once in awhile, not to mention that they form the basis which most competing brands build upon and are subsequently compared to.  Not many think that they are anywhere near the top of any range in terms of absolute quality, materials, craftsmanship, or style.  So, what is it about these instruments that makes them acceptable in almost any condition and/or modified to almost any degree; and unplayed, perfect condition isn’t necessarily a desirable thing?  What makes the Fender vibe so immutable? Edward G.

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Fender has got to be the only brand of bass or guitar that the more > beaten, worn –even trashed– it looks, the more people seem to love > it and desire it.  Rightly or wrongly, this is not true of any other > brand that I know of, where anything less than mint can REALLY make a > difference in even being able to sell it at all, no matter how good it > is.  Fender’s drawbacks have been debated ad nauseum, but we can also > agree that they can sound and play rather nice once in awhile, not to > mention that they form the basis which most competing brands build > upon and are subsequently compared to.  Not many think that they are > anywhere near the top of any range in terms of absolute quality, > materials, craftsmanship, or style.  So, what is it about these > instruments that makes them acceptable in almost any condition and/or > modified to almost any degree; and unplayed, perfect condition isn’t > necessarily a desirable thing?  What makes the Fender vibe so > immutable? > Edward G.

Unfortunately, no matter how many times you post this, it won’t make it sound any better. cb

Response:

Question:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -

All kitchen appliances come in white…

Response:

Hey! don’t you have one of those puke green stoves? dw

Response:

>Hey! don’t you have one of those puke green stoves? >dw

Are you saying that Bob Flint married Broom Hilda? — Now you know why I used the qualifier "practically" –Bender

Response:

>>Hey! don’t you have one of those puke green stoves? >dw > Are you saying that Bob Flint married Broom Hilda?

 From what he’s told me ’bout his ex ? That’s not a bad guess. dw – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> — > Now you know why I used the qualifier "practically" –Bender

Response:

>Hey! don’t you have one of those puke green stoves? >dw

I know my kitchen is dirty, but…. no… it’s black…. glass top….. like the woman who took my virginity… LOL!

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->Hey! don’t you have one of those puke green stoves? >dw > I know my kitchen is dirty, but…. no… > it’s black…. glass top….. > like the woman who took my virginity… > LOL!

She had a glass top? I bet she had a Tung Sol. dw

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->>Hey! don’t you have one of those puke green stoves? >>dw > I know my kitchen is dirty, but…. no… > it’s black…. glass top….. > like the woman who took my virginity… > LOL! >She had a glass top? >I bet she had a Tung Sol. >dw

Her top reminded me of breakfest….. eggs sunny side up… no tits but HUGE areals… my ex was the opposite, 44DD with nips to die for… poke your dam eyes out!  She could carry two 14" stillson wrenches no hands! no shit!!

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->>>Hey! don’t you have one of those puke green stoves? >>>dw >> I know my kitchen is dirty, but…. no… >> it’s black…. glass top….. >> like the woman who took my virginity… >> LOL! >She had a glass top? >I bet she had a Tung Sol. >dw >Her top reminded me of breakfest….. eggs sunny side up… no tits but HUGE areals… >my ex was the opposite, 44DD with nips to die for… poke your dam eyes out!  She could carry two 14" stillson wrenches >no hands! no shit!!

At least you’re not holding a grudge. Pete — Now you know why I used the qualifier "practically" –Bender

Response:

>my ex was the opposite, 44DD with nips to die for…

Yeah, they were great :^)

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->>>>Hey! don’t you have one of those puke green stoves? >>>>dw >>> I know my kitchen is dirty, but…. no… >>> it’s black…. glass top….. >>> like the woman who took my virginity… >>> LOL! >>She had a glass top? >>I bet she had a Tung Sol. >>dw >Her top reminded me of breakfest….. eggs sunny side up… no tits but HUGE areals… >my ex was the opposite, 44DD with nips to die for… poke your dam eyes out!  She could carry two 14" stillson wrenches >no hands! no shit!! >At least you’re not holding a grudge.

Yeah, but he wants the damn wrenches back. Ron

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->>>>>Hey! don’t you have one of those puke green stoves? >>>>>dw >>>>I know my kitchen is dirty, but…. no… >>>>it’s black…. glass top….. >>>>like the woman who took my virginity… >>>>LOL! >>>She had a glass top? >>>I bet she had a Tung Sol. >>>dw >>Her top reminded me of breakfest….. eggs sunny side up… no tits but HUGE areals… >>my ex was the opposite, 44DD with nips to die for… poke your dam eyes out!  She could carry two 14" stillson wrenches >>no hands! no shit!! >At least you’re not holding a grudge. > Yeah, but he wants the damn wrenches back. > Ron

LOL! Ron, you owe me a rootbeer, dang it! Oh well, it was time to clean the monitor screen anywho. dw dw

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->>>>>>Hey! don’t you have one of those puke green stoves? >>>>>>dw >>>>>I know my kitchen is dirty, but…. no… >>>>>it’s black…. glass top….. >>>>>like the woman who took my virginity… >>>>>LOL! >>>>She had a glass top? >>>>I bet she had a Tung Sol. >>>>dw >>>Her top reminded me of breakfest….. eggs sunny side up… no tits but HUGE areals… >>>my ex was the opposite, 44DD with nips to die for… poke your dam eyes out!  She could carry two 14" stillson wrenches >>>no hands! no shit!! >>At least you’re not holding a grudge. > Yeah, but he wants the damn wrenches back. > Ron >LOL! >Ron, you owe me a rootbeer, dang it! >Oh well, it was time to clean the monitor screen anywho. >dw

Spit take! Remember, set all drinks down and swallow, before reading aga posts. I’m pretty sure that this is all covered in the FAQ. Pete — Now you know why I used the qualifier "practically" –Bender

Response:

Question:

>I got fired for filling up a guys 55 gallon drum he had in the back >of his pick up.  I didn’t know but I found out that is not legal or maybe >that was just the owners rules

just to satisfy my own curiosity and maybe yours if I stirred it at all, Here are some sources for  the rules/laws about not filling in a pickup bed: http://www.chevron.com/prodserv/fuels/bulletin/product_safety.shtml http://www.gov.nf.ca/labour/labour/OHS/hazard_alert.asp#Filling%20Por… Aim Be who you are and say what you feel Because those who mind don’t matter And those who matter don’t mind -Dr. Seuss http://www.aimgrrrl.com my Enbrel journal: http://www.livejournal.com/users/aims_as_journal

Response:

1957 The year I was born.  I remember our first brand new car.  1964 Fairlane with four on the floor. I remember the day Kennedy was shot. I remember buying those Indian head cookies for 5 cents. I remember buying cigarettes for my mom at the store. I remember when everyone was upset that the Beatles had hair that looked like a girls. I remember when intergration was introduced in our school. I remember when we couldn’t wear pants to school.  That if you got a whooping in class, you got another when you got home. I remember when it was okay to pray in school. I remember when we brought bibles to school not guns. I remember when they said Sex education in school would prevent Teen Pregnancy. Well In highschool I was only aware of a few girls that got pregnant.  When my daughters were in High School, I could not believe how many of their friends and peers were pregnant.Must be teaching the wrong sex education class. I remember when it was okay for 18 yr old girls to buy beer, but our boyfriends couldn’t buy it untill they were 21. I remember when there were only 4 channels on tv. Cindy

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> This is the sort of thing that may have been posted here earlier. > I don’t recall seeing it before, so am taking a chance it’s new to > everybody… > The following were some comments made in the year 1957. > (1) "I’ll tell you one thing, if things keep going the way they are, > it’s going to be impossible to buy a week’s groceries for $20.00." > (2) "Have you seen the new cars coming out next year? It won’t be long > when $5,000 will only buy a used one." > (3) "If cigarettes keep going up in price, I’m going to quit. A > quarter a pack is ridiculous." > (4) "Did you hear the post office is thinking about charging a dime > just to mail a letter?" > (5) "If they raise the minimum wage to $1, nobody will be able to hire > outside help at the store." > (6) "When I first started driving, who would have thought gas would > someday cost 29 cents a gallon. Guess we’d be better off leaving the > car in the garage," > (7) "Kids today are impossible. Those ducktail hair cuts make it > impossible to stay groomed. Next thing you know, boys will be wearing > their hair as long as the girls," > (8) "I’m afraid to send my kids to the movies any more. Ever since > they let Clark Gable get by with saying "damn" in "Gone With The > Wind", it seems every new movie has either "Hell" or "damn" in it." > (9) "I read the other day where some scientist thinks it’s possible to > put a man on the moon by the end of the century. They even have some > fellows they call astronauts preparing for it down in Texas." > (10) "Did you see where some baseball player just signed a contract > for $75,000 a year just to play ball? It wouldn’t surprise me if > someday they will be making more than the president." > (11) "I never thought I’d see the day all our kitchen appliances would > be electric. They are even making electric typewriters now." > (12) "It’s too bad things are so tough nowadays. I see where a few > married women are having to work to make ends meet." > (13) "It won’t be long before young couples are going to have to hire > someone to watch their kids so they can both work." > (14) "Marriage doesn’t mean a thing any more, those Hollywood stars > seem to be getting divorces at the drop of a hat." > (15) "I’m just afraid the Volkswagen car is going to open the door to > a whole lot of foreign business." > (16) "Thank goodness I won’t live to see the day when the Government > takes half our income in taxes. I sometimes wonder if we are electing > the best people to Congress." > (17) "The drive-in restaurant is convenient in nice weather, but I > seriously doubt they will ever catch on." > (18) "There is no sense going to Lincoln or Omaha anymore for a > weekend.  It costs nearly $15.00 a night to stay in a hotel." > (19) "No one can afford to be sick any more, $35.00 a day in the > hospital is too rich for my blood." > I sure do remember all this stuff. Do I hear, "OVER THE HILL?"

Response:

> While I was smoking back in 1971 and in school in NC, we were paying 25 > cents per pack out of a machine and less if you bought a carton. We both > quit as we were moving to NY after the wedding and they were charging 50 > cents per pack and they weren’t fresh. lol > Nothing worse than a reformed smoker. > Duckie

Hi Duckie,,,,  Welllll, I can almost agree with you.  I think the worst are the politicians that ran the price of cigs up to fund the hospitals for people with lung cancer and used the money to fund their own social programs that had nothing to do with cancer.   Please do not take the time to see where your state used the money they got from the tobacco companies.   Texas makes me sick  I hope you have better luck in your state.   Please remember that these taxes come most from the poorest in our land. Harv

Response:

> Okay, Gasoline was $0.20 per gallon.  Now it costs $2.00 per gallon, or > ten times as much as back then.  Cigarettes were $0.52 per carton then > and $30.00 per carton now, or fifty-seven times as much as back then. > Shouldn’t gas cost around $11.50 per gallon just to keep parity with > tobacco?

 From memories of working in dad’s store, 1947-1957:  Daily paper was 5 cents, a dime on Sundays.  $1.00/month subscription.  Today daily is 50 cents, $1.50 on Sundays, $18/month subscription.  Gerber’s Baby Food was 9 cents a jar or 3/25 cents.  Today a single jar is over 50 cents.  And "Babies are our business,  our ONLY business" is no longer Gerber’s slogan.  With the lower  birth rate, they are now targeting seniors with dental problems.  Cigarettes sold for 18 cents a pack, $1.75 a carton.  (I paid 50 cents  a carton from sea stores whenever my Reserve ship went beyond  the 3-mile line.)  Regular gas was 28 cents, Ethyl (leaded) was 33 cents.  There weren’t many price changes in that period.  After Korea,  prices began to creep up, penny by penny.  Today they LEAP up,  20 cents to 40 cents in a month.  Life insurance companies in 1960 were predicting today’s cost  of living.  That was 13-14 years before the oil embargo which  sent the price of gas soaring for the first time.  Then land values  began to take off like an SST at Orle.

Response:

While I was smoking back in 1971 and in school in NC, we were paying 25 cents per pack out of a machine and less if you bought a carton. We both quit as we were moving to NY after the wedding and they were charging 50 cents per pack and they weren’t fresh. lol Nothing worse than a reformed smoker. Duckie > LOL Larry.  I wonder what a pack of cigarettes would cost today > without all the taxes, hidden and otherwise.  Without the cost > of legal action built into the selling price? > I live in California, and most stores go to a lot of trouble to > secure tobacco products from theft.  Some stores have stopped > selling entirely as they couldn’t get a handle on internal > theft.  It was a mini cultural shock the last time I was in > North Carolina and tobacco products were just out on the shelves > the same as candy bars. > — > Jo Firey

–   _(‘>  (_<_)           _   _(‘< -quack  (_<_)     _    __(‘< *QUACK!* <_{__)   _(‘< "|,,|_"  (_<_)   _(‘< "AFLAC!"  (_<_)

Response:

> I got fired for filling up a guys 55 gallon drum he had in the back >of his pick up.  I didn’t know but I found out that is not legal or maybe >that was just the owners rules.

Yeah, it’s illegal in most places. The plastic bedliners build up static electricity and can cause an explosion with the gas fumes. You’re sposed to take the drum out of the bed to fill it. (yeah I know, then how the hell do you lift a full 55 gal drum back in?) lemme look n see if I can find a source on the warning. Aim Be who you are and say what you feel Because those who mind don’t matter And those who matter don’t mind -Dr. Seuss http://www.aimgrrrl.com my Enbrel journal: http://www.livejournal.com/users/aims_as_journal

Response:

alt.support.arthritis: >Okay, Gasoline was $0.20 per gallon.  Now it costs $2.00 per gallon, or >ten times as much as back then.  Cigarettes were $0.52 per carton then >and $30.00 per carton now, or fifty-seven times as much as back then. >Shouldn’t gas cost around $11.50 per gallon just to keep parity with >tobacco?

Come to Canada, Larry, and pay more like $3 or $4 a gallon! — Joan Tom the ‘Ironman" graduated with honours from the University of Profanity.

Response:

LOL Larry.  I wonder what a pack of cigarettes would cost today without all the taxes, hidden and otherwise.  Without the cost of legal action built into the selling price? I live in California, and most stores go to a lot of trouble to secure tobacco products from theft.  Some stores have stopped selling entirely as they couldn’t get a handle on internal theft.  It was a mini cultural shock the last time I was in North Carolina and tobacco products were just out on the shelves the same as candy bars. — Jo Firey "Life is not measured by the number of breaths we take, but by the moments that take our breath away."

> In ‘77/78 (or whatever), on $5, I would put a 1/4 tank in the car, buy > cigarettes, soda, snacks, and still have change. > Hey, Harv!  Gwen!  Shirlawn!  One of you want to tell the kids here how > it was back in ‘52 when you’d fill up the Hudson’s tank for $5.00, and > that was Full Service, and drive for the whole week?  I

remember buying Pall – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Mall’s, for $0.07 per pack, $0.52 per carton of 10 packs. Soda’s were > available in machines only in a 6oz bottle and cost a nickel in the machine > but you got two cents back you returned the empty bottle to a store.  A 12oz > bag of Red Dot Potato Chips (a Midwestern Brand Name) cost a nickel. > Lay’s was not a National Brand and you could find them only in TX, OK, LA > and NM.  Of course the minimum wage was a whopping  $0.70 per hour and > that was on a forty-eight hour work week.  Lived high on the hog on that > $33.60, per week, before any withholdings, didn’t we? > Okay, Gasoline was $0.20 per gallon.  Now it costs $2.00 per gallon, or > ten times as much as back then.  Cigarettes were $0.52 per carton then > and $30.00 per carton now, or fifty-seven times as much as back then. > Shouldn’t gas cost around $11.50 per gallon just to keep parity with > tobacco?  Anyone care to work the numbers for what a gallon of milk > should cost for parity with cigarettes?  My first Mickey D’s cost twelve > cents, fries were another dime, same with a Hot Apple Pie and another > dime got you a Large Soft Drink.  Fifteen cents would get you a Milk > Shake, your choice of Choc., Vanilla or Strawberry.  So, a meal of 2 > burgers, fries, large Coke, Chocolate Shake and Hot Apple Pie set me > back $0.69.  Today that should cost around $39.00 for parity with a > carton of cigs. > Oh well.  Things will get better right?  I mean, prices have to come > down don’t they?  Well, don’t they? > Be well, > Larry

Response:

LOLOL   Yes,  all of that.  I worked in 3 different filling stations during my junior high days but I do not think I ever made as much as $.70 an hour and gas cost $.29 cents a gallon but would go down to $.19 during price wars.  I got fired for filling up a guys 55 gallon drum he had in the back of his pick up.  I didn’t know but I found out that is not legal or maybe that was just the owners rules.  What ever,,,,  I was working again in two days for a better boss too.        I set pins in the bowling alley at night for 10 cents a line too during those years too and on into high school.  Learned to smoke and fight and where to spend $10 that was really fine.   Ya know,,,, maybe those were not such good days after all.  LOL Harv

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> In ‘77/78 (or whatever), on $5, I would put a 1/4 tank in the car, buy > cigarettes, soda, snacks, and still have change. > Hey, Harv!  Gwen!  Shirlawn!  One of you want to tell the kids here how > it was back in ‘52 when you’d fill up the Hudson’s tank for $5.00, and > that was Full Service, and drive for the whole week?  I remember buying Pall > Mall’s, for $0.07 per pack, $0.52 per carton of 10 packs.  Soda’s were > available in machines only in a 6oz bottle and cost a nickel in the machine > but you got two cents back you returned the empty bottle to a store.  A 12oz > bag of Red Dot Potato Chips (a Midwestern Brand Name) cost a nickel. > Lay’s was not a National Brand and you could find them only in TX, OK, LA > and NM.  Of course the minimum wage was a whopping  $0.70 per hour and > that was on a forty-eight hour work week.  Lived high on the hog on that > $33.60, per week, before any withholdings, didn’t we? > Okay, Gasoline was $0.20 per gallon.  Now it costs $2.00 per gallon, or > ten times as much as back then.  Cigarettes were $0.52 per carton then > and $30.00 per carton now, or fifty-seven times as much as back then. > Shouldn’t gas cost around $11.50 per gallon just to keep parity with > tobacco?  Anyone care to work the numbers for what a gallon of milk > should cost for parity with cigarettes?  My first Mickey D’s cost twelve > cents, fries were another dime, same with a Hot Apple Pie and another > dime got you a Large Soft Drink.  Fifteen cents would get you a Milk > Shake, your choice of Choc., Vanilla or Strawberry.  So, a meal of 2 > burgers, fries, large Coke, Chocolate Shake and Hot Apple Pie set me > back $0.69.  Today that should cost around $39.00 for parity with a > carton of cigs. > Oh well.  Things will get better right?  I mean, prices have to come > down don’t they?  Well, don’t they? > Be well, > Larry

Response:

>>> (12) "It’s too bad things are so tough nowadays. I see where a few >> married women are having to work to make ends meet." > And exactly when in history was this NOT true?  The economic strata is > applies to goes through changes, but it has always been true that some > married women had to work – outside the home – to make ends meet. > What has changed is the level of strata that requires a woman to work > outside the home. (As opposed to chosing to work, which is an entirely > different thing.) > Mike

Yeah, maybe.  But the original statement said "a few married women are having to work to make ends meet" – THAT has always been true.  Also, today’s definition of middle class, at least in the US, is much wealthier than it used to be – more clothes, fancier shoes, more stuff, more cars, larger houses.  The median new home size today is double what it was 50 years ago.   Maintaining this level of middle class lifestyle takes more income, but living at that level is not necessary, though some people believe it is. (snipping the tirade I started to go off on re: consumerism)  Also, some jobs worked by women in the past were invisible to many.  For example, family farms used to be prevalent in this country – the wives/mothers were an intergral part of the team that kept the farm functioning and their work went far beyond "housewife" stuff, but they were not considered "working" women by much of society.   — Nann remove the Gator cheer to email me I like nonsense; it wakes up the brain cells. – Dr Suess

Response:

> (12) "It’s too bad things are so tough nowadays. I see where a few > married women are having to work to make ends meet." > And exactly when in history was this NOT true?  The economic strata is > applies to goes through changes, but it has always been true that some > married women had to work – outside the home – to make ends meet. > — > Nann > remove the Gator cheer to email me > I like nonsense; it wakes up the brain cells. – Dr Suess

True but mainly  during and after the WW2 where women really went to work and found out they liked it.  Then our taxes have continued to go up to the point where it takes two people to support a family and children pay the long term price of growing up with a part time mother and father.   As Walter C. used to say,,,, "and thats the way it is " or was and it is only tomorrow that can be changed. Harv

Response:

> (12) "It’s too bad things are so tough nowadays. I see where a few > married women are having to work to make ends meet." > And exactly when in history was this NOT true?  The economic strata is > applies to goes through changes, but it has always been true that some > married women had to work – outside the home – to make ends meet.

What has changed is the level of strata that requires a woman to work outside the home. (As opposed to chosing to work, which is an entirely different thing.) Mike

Response:

> In ‘77/78 (or whatever), on $5, I would put a 1/4 tank in the car, buy > cigarettes, soda, snacks, and still have change.

Hey, Harv!  Gwen!  Shirlawn!  One of you want to tell the kids here how it was back in ‘52 when you’d fill up the Hudson’s tank for $5.00, and that was Full Service, and drive for the whole week?  I remember buying Pall Mall’s, for $0.07 per pack, $0.52 per carton of 10 packs.  Soda’s were available in machines only in a 6oz bottle and cost a nickel in the machine but you got two cents back you returned the empty bottle to a store.  A 12oz bag of Red Dot Potato Chips (a Midwestern Brand Name) cost a nickel. Lay’s was not a National Brand and you could find them only in TX, OK, LA and NM.  Of course the minimum wage was a whopping  $0.70 per hour and that was on a forty-eight hour work week.  Lived high on the hog on that $33.60, per week, before any withholdings, didn’t we? Okay, Gasoline was $0.20 per gallon.  Now it costs $2.00 per gallon, or ten times as much as back then.  Cigarettes were $0.52 per carton then and $30.00 per carton now, or fifty-seven times as much as back then. Shouldn’t gas cost around $11.50 per gallon just to keep parity with tobacco?  Anyone care to work the numbers for what a gallon of milk should cost for parity with cigarettes?  My first Mickey D’s cost twelve cents, fries were another dime, same with a Hot Apple Pie and another dime got you a Large Soft Drink.  Fifteen cents would get you a Milk Shake, your choice of Choc., Vanilla or Strawberry.  So, a meal of 2 burgers, fries, large Coke, Chocolate Shake and Hot Apple Pie set me back $0.69.  Today that should cost around $39.00 for parity with a carton of cigs. Oh well.  Things will get better right?  I mean, prices have to come down don’t they?  Well, don’t they? Be well, Larry

Response:

How about: We’ll never be in a war like Viet Nam again. Duh! Hustlin’ Hank

Response:

> How about: We’ll never be in a war like Viet Nam again. Duh! > Hustlin’ Hank

 #1  Couldn’t come from the 50’s  #2  French haven’t invited us to a war like Nam (French IndoChina) again.  (Yeah, the French were getting the crap beat out of them one more and  had to go around begging for help, just like in WW II.)  Duh!

Response:

> (12) "It’s too bad things are so tough nowadays. I see where a few > married women are having to work to make ends meet."

And exactly when in history was this NOT true?  The economic strata is applies to goes through changes, but it has always been true that some married women had to work – outside the home – to make ends meet. — Nann remove the Gator cheer to email me I like nonsense; it wakes up the brain cells. – Dr Suess

Response:

>(6) "When I first started driving, who would have thought gas would >someday cost 29 cents a gallon. Guess we’d be better off leaving the >car in the garage,"

I remember my father putting $2.00 worth of gas in his truck and driving quite a long time on it, not sure how long, but it went a long way then. :-) — Joan Tom the ‘Ironman" graduated with honours from the University of Profanity.

Response:

>The economic strata is >applies to goes through changes, but it has always been true that some >married women had to work – outside the home – to make ends meet.

I’d say that among poor women, it’s been pervasive. – Mary MacT http://www.alamedacreek.net (new site under construction: http://www.alamedacreek.net/mary)

Response:

alt.support.arthritis: >(6) "When I first started driving, who would have thought gas would >someday cost 29 cents a gallon. Guess we’d be better off leaving the >car in the garage," > I remember my father putting $2.00 worth of gas in his truck and driving quite a > long time on it, not sure how long, but it went a long way then. :-)

In ‘77/78 (or whatever), on $5, I would put a 1/4 tank in the car, buy cigarettes, soda, snacks, and still have change. Remember when you tried not to break a 20? "Oh, if I break this 20, it will be gone." Now its the same with 50’s and 100’s — break them and they’re gone.

Response:

This is the sort of thing that may have been posted here earlier. I don’t recall seeing it before, so am taking a chance it’s new to everybody… The following were some comments made in the year 1957. (1) "I’ll tell you one thing, if things keep going the way they are, it’s going to be impossible to buy a week’s groceries for $20.00." (2) "Have you seen the new cars coming out next year? It won’t be long when $5,000 will only buy a used one." (3) "If cigarettes keep going up in price, I’m going to quit. A quarter a pack is ridiculous." (4) "Did you hear the post office is thinking about charging a dime just to mail a letter?" (5) "If they raise the minimum wage to $1, nobody will be able to hire outside help at the store." (6) "When I first started driving, who would have thought gas would someday cost 29 cents a gallon. Guess we’d be better off leaving the car in the garage," (7) "Kids today are impossible. Those ducktail hair cuts make it impossible to stay groomed. Next thing you know, boys will be wearing their hair as long as the girls," (8) "I’m afraid to send my kids to the movies any more. Ever since they let Clark Gable get by with saying "damn" in "Gone With The Wind", it seems every new movie has either "Hell" or "damn" in it." (9) "I read the other day where some scientist thinks it’s possible to put a man on the moon by the end of the century. They even have some fellows they call astronauts preparing for it down in Texas." (10) "Did you see where some baseball player just signed a contract for $75,000 a year just to play ball? It wouldn’t surprise me if someday they will be making more than the president." (11) "I never thought I’d see the day all our kitchen appliances would be electric. They are even making electric typewriters now." (12) "It’s too bad things are so tough nowadays. I see where a few married women are having to work to make ends meet." (13) "It won’t be long before young couples are going to have to hire someone to watch their kids so they can both work." (14) "Marriage doesn’t mean a thing any more, those Hollywood stars seem to be getting divorces at the drop of a hat." (15) "I’m just afraid the Volkswagen car is going to open the door to a whole lot of foreign business." (16) "Thank goodness I won’t live to see the day when the Government takes half our income in taxes. I sometimes wonder if we are electing the best people to Congress." (17) "The drive-in restaurant is convenient in nice weather, but I seriously doubt they will ever catch on." (18) "There is no sense going to Lincoln or Omaha anymore for a weekend.  It costs nearly $15.00 a night to stay in a hotel." (19) "No one can afford to be sick any more, $35.00 a day in the hospital is too rich for my blood." I sure do remember all this stuff. Do I hear, "OVER THE HILL?"

Response:

Question:

> Thoughts? > And are the big gas stoves, like the Wolf, *really* worth having?

That depends on your interest in cooking AND local zoning laws. Check with your community’s zoning department.

Response:

>> 1) Pilot-light gas stoves (like this one) are intrinsically unsafe. I am > going to be renting my house out part of the time; do I really want to be > facilitating the efforts of the renters to blow up the place? > Don’t be silly.  Pilot-light gas stoves have a partially charged > magnet and a thermocouple which senses that the pilot is on — shutting > off the gas when it isn’t.  This is a century-old technology.

   …. with the caveat "When they work".   As we found with our 50 year old gas furnace that filled the house with gas after the pilot light blew, when we were on vacation.   Obviously they work 99.9999999999% of the time, but when they don’t, well, that is one more thing to worry about in a frequently unoccupied house. – Rich

Response:

Re commercial gas stoves: Yipes! A veritable hornet’s nest of thoughtful, well-reasoned opinions! Let me clarify a couple things. My intentions for the house are apparently important. Those are:    a) My vacation use. I have frequent big social gatherings. A stove that       really heats and an oven that holds a lot of stuff would both be       wonderful to have. I am reacting against my present living       arrangements.:)    b) Rental use. I hope for it to be a high-end rental. If the customer       walks in, looks at the groovy stove, and says "Ooh! This *must* be       a good house!", well, so be it. I’ll accept their money. They’re not       going to react that way for an electric.    c) Sale. There’s about a 50% chance I’ll need to sell it in a couple       years. Be nice if those customers "ooh" and "aah" the same way as       the rental customers. If not the Wolf, then what? Re the hood: it’s a 54" non-commercial "Vent-a-Hood" brand, with the quiet fans. Re the insulation: I know the commercial stoves are less insulated; I think I can work it out. Re the price: asking price was $1000 for the hood and the stove together, in very good condition. Both stainless steel. thanks, Garry PS – Hm. I see in today’s paper that the seller just raised the price.

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->Hi all — >I’m busy renovating a vacation house. I had heard that Wolf stoves were the >cat’s meow for serious cooking, and so I hunted until I found a used one for >the new kitchen, at a reasonable price. It’s 48" wide, four-burner plus big >griddle, and it’s a *commercial* model, and comes with a hood. >While try to decide whether to go for it (the thing is awfully big), I called >a friend who is an expert cook for some last-chance advice. She said "Don’t >do it!!!" Her reasons: >1) Pilot-light gas stoves (like this one) are intrinsically unsafe. I am >going to be renting my house out part of the time; do I really want to be >facilitating the efforts of the renters to blow up the place? >2) The commercial Wolf stoves have knobs that are front-facing and easy to >turn. My friend says it’s unsafe ever to allow children into the vicinity of >such a stove, unless you keep the knobs removed. (It’s also unsafe to allow >adults to lounge against such a stove.) >Her recommendation was to buy a good electric stove or cooktop instead. I >know there are some clever electrics out there now, but I’m a little >disappointed. >Thoughts? >And are the big gas stoves, like the Wolf, *really* worth having?

Wolf is built like a tank, for heavy duty use.  Not much as looks go to blend in with domestic kitchen cabinets and decor.  You don’t hear of them blowing up in restaurants where conditions are far more hazardous,  so the gas pilot light  caution is alarmist.  Unless you have a gas leak in the house.  As for the other objections do you have kids or adults who will fool around with kitched appliance knobs?  No? Then all  this boils down to is will it look good in your kitchen?

Response:

> "Commercial model" as in restaurant or "Commercial Style" as in > residential?  Wolf makes both and this is an important distinction.

Wolf used to make models for the home, but they no longer do.  All their current products are true commercial models. Cheers, Eric

Response:

>1) Pilot-light gas stoves (like this one) are intrinsically unsafe. … >2) The commercial Wolf stoves have knobs that are front-facing and easy to >turn. My friend says it’s unsafe ever to allow children into the vicinity of >such a stove, unless you keep the knobs removed. (It’s also unsafe to allow >adults to lounge against such a stove.)

Jeez, your ‘friend’ is a real "consumer reports" type, scared, frightened of all the bizarre and far fetched things that might happen if life unless someone else takes the responsibility for her own safety. Millions and millions of appliances have pilot lights.  Have for a century or so.  Yes every once in a very great while someone might have a problem with one.  Every once in a great while other perils happen also.  This is ludicrous.  A bigger problem is gas burners being left on (with no flame) in non-pilot stoves, oh well. Small children should also not play with sharp knives or stick their fingers in the outlets (but somehow we encourage them to climb trees?).  Adults "ALLOWED" to lounge against the stove?  You lean on a hot stove you should get your ass burned.  You can’t be serious.  Your adult friends can’t be ALLOWED near a stove knob? If you actual take any of her advice seriously, no, you should not have the stove, and your friends need to be institutionalized as they are clearly incompetent. mho, -v.

Response:

Gerry For increased safety, Garland offers electronic ignition as an option on most ranges. This will also save you $$ on gas when not in residence. Garland is considered to be one of the top four pro ranges (Vulcan, Garland, Wolf, and Jade) Colin – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – > Re commercial gas stoves: > Yipes! A veritable hornet’s nest of thoughtful, well-reasoned opinions! > Let me clarify a couple things. My intentions for the house are apparently > important. Those are: >    a) My vacation use. I have frequent big social gatherings. A stove that >       really heats and an oven that holds a lot of stuff would both be >       wonderful to have. I am reacting against my present living >       arrangements.:) >    b) Rental use. I hope for it to be a high-end rental. If the customer >       walks in, looks at the groovy stove, and says "Ooh! This *must* be >       a good house!", well, so be it. I’ll accept their money. They’re not >       going to react that way for an electric. >    c) Sale. There’s about a 50% chance I’ll need to sell it in a couple >       years. Be nice if those customers "ooh" and "aah" the same way as >       the rental customers. > If not the Wolf, then what? > Re the hood: it’s a 54" non-commercial "Vent-a-Hood" brand, with the quiet > fans. > Re the insulation: I know the commercial stoves are less insulated; I think I > can work it out. > Re the price: asking price was $1000 for the hood and the stove together, in > very good condition. Both stainless steel. > thanks, > Garry > PS – Hm. I see in today’s paper that the seller just raised the price.

Response:

> Gerry > For increased safety, Garland offers electronic ignition as an option on > most ranges. This will also save you $$ on gas when not in residence. > Garland is considered to be one of the top four pro ranges (Vulcan, > Garland, Wolf, and Jade) > Colin

You forgot Imperial. Jack Stove

Response:

> > Garland is considered to be one of the top four pro ranges (Vulcan, > Garland, Wolf, and Jade) > Colin > You forgot Imperial.

Jade, and Montague are far and away better than the others, if you are talking commercial ranges. The heavy duty series in Vulcan, Wolf, and Garland are all similar, and the restaurant, or economy lines are all crap. Price competition has led all of them to manufacture as inexpensively as possible. Brian

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> > Garland is considered to be one of the top four pro ranges (Vulcan, > > Garland, Wolf, and Jade) > > Colin > You forgot Imperial. > Jade, and Montague are far and away better than the others, if you are > talking commercial ranges. The heavy duty series in Vulcan, Wolf, and > Garland are all similar, and the restaurant, or economy lines are all crap. > Price competition has led all of them to manufacture as inexpensively as > possible. > Brian

Restaurants around here are using Imperials.  I used one myself for 8 years. I don’t agree with you there. Jack Stove

Response:

> Restaurants around here are using Imperials.  I used one myself for 8 years. > I don’t agree with you there. > Jack Stove

Where are you? I don’t see any Imperials around here. Could also be bad local reps. Maybe a regional thing? If they don’t warehouse in the Midwest, shipping may be cost prohibitive. Brian

Response:

<Garland is considered to be one of the top four pro ranges (Vulcan, <Garland, Wolf, and Jade) Where did you get that idea? —                                          Regards,                                          David War is God’s way of teaching Americans geography.         -Ambrose Bierce "What would life be without arithmetic, but a scene of horrors?"                        -Rev. Sydney Smith, letter to young lady, 22 July 1835 Department of Philosophy & Religion NCSU Box 8103 Raleigh, 27695-8103

Response:

>>>Garland is considered to be one of the top four pro ranges (Vulcan, >>Garland, Wolf, and Jade) >>Colin >You forgot Imperial. > Jade, and Montague are far and away better than the others,

Those would be my first choices, yeah.  A Montague cooking island with 12 burners, a hotel broiler, salamanders above, a couple of fryolaters, and six ovens.  Now you’re talking.

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – > Hi all — > I’m busy renovating a vacation house. I had heard that Wolf stoves were the > cat’s meow for serious cooking, and so I hunted until I found a used one for > the new kitchen, at a reasonable price. It’s 48" wide, four-burner plus big > griddle, and it’s a *commercial* model, and comes with a hood. > While try to decide whether to go for it (the thing is awfully big), I called > a friend who is an expert cook for some last-chance advice. She said "Don’t > do it!!!" Her reasons: > 1) Pilot-light gas stoves (like this one) are intrinsically unsafe. I am > going to be renting my house out part of the time; do I really want to be > facilitating the efforts of the renters to blow up the place? > 2) The commercial Wolf stoves have knobs that are front-facing and easy to > turn. My friend says it’s unsafe ever to allow children into the vicinity of > such a stove, unless you keep the knobs removed. (It’s also unsafe to allow > adults to lounge against such a stove.) > Her recommendation was to buy a good electric stove or cooktop instead. I > know there are some clever electrics out there now, but I’m a little > disappointed. > Thoughts? > And are the big gas stoves, like the Wolf, *really* worth having? > Thanks. > Garry

There’s nothing particularly unsafe with a pilot light if the house is occupied.  A good thing about them is that you can use the oven even if the electricity is out.  And if you were not going to rent the place out, you could just shut off the gas to the stove when the home is empty.  But you can’t depend on the renters to light the pilot light when they get there and turn the gas valve off before they leave.  IMHO, that shoots down the idea right there. You probably don’t really have a 48" stove opening, and certainly don’t have an appropriate vent hood. If you really want gas, get a new stove with sealed burners.  You can get a really nice one with a high-output front burner for about $400.  Otherwise go with electric (assuming you have an adequate electrical service). I would like to have a 36" or bigger gas stove with 15K BTU burners and a griddle and a convection oven in my home, but I wouldn’t want one in a rent house. Best regards, Bob

Response:

> > "Commercial model" as in restaurant or "Commercial Style" as in > residential?  Wolf makes both and this is an important distinction. > Wolf used to make models for the home, but they no longer do.  All their > current products are true commercial models. > Cheers, > Eric

The Wolf residential line was purchased by Sub-Zero about 2 years ago.  The product is relatively unchanged and is most certainly still being manufactured. You are right in that Wolf commercial and Wolf residential are now under totally separate entities.

Response:

> Jade, and Montague are far and away better than the others, if you are > talking commercial ranges. The heavy duty series in Vulcan, Wolf, and > Garland are all similar, and the restaurant, or economy lines are all crap. > Price competition has led all of them to manufacture as inexpensively as > possible. > Brian

Just to clarify- when I said economy lines are crap, I didn’t mean everything that I hadn’t listed. I meant the economy lines of Vulcan, Wolf and Garland.

Response:

>>>And are the big gas stoves, like the Wolf, *really* worth having? >Thre words here, insurance, insurance, insurance. If you are renting >it out your insurance company are going to be really interested in you >having a pilot light gas stove.

I doubt that very much. When we bought our current home, the insurance company never asked anything about the type of stove. Has that ever happened to you? >There is the risk of gassing the people in their sleep if the pilot >gets blown out. If the gas doesn’t do it the explosive mix in the >kitchen will certainly get their attention when making the first cup >of coffee.

Complete and utter nonsense. A pilot light doesn’t use anywhere *nearly* enough gas to do either of those things. I’m beginning to suspect that you have never lived in a home with a gas stove with a pilot light. >This is a no-brainer, if you are renting it, make it as idiot proof as >possible, and DO tell your insurance company you are renting. The >liability insurance may disuade you.

That’s actually reasonable advice, but more so due to the problems inherent to owning rental property than to any imaginary hazards of pilot lights in gas stoves.

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Hi all — > I’m busy renovating a vacation house. I had heard that Wolf stoves were the > cat’s meow for serious cooking, and so I hunted until I found a used one for > the new kitchen, at a reasonable price. It’s 48" wide, four-burner plus big > griddle, and it’s a *commercial* model, and comes with a hood. > While try to decide whether to go for it (the thing is awfully big), I called > a friend who is an expert cook for some last-chance advice. She said "Don’t > do it!!!" Her reasons: > 1) Pilot-light gas stoves (like this one) are intrinsically unsafe. I am > going to be renting my house out part of the time; do I really want to be > facilitating the efforts of the renters to blow up the place? > 2) The commercial Wolf stoves have knobs that are front-facing and easy to > turn. My friend says it’s unsafe ever to allow children into the vicinity of > such a stove, unless you keep the knobs removed. (It’s also unsafe to allow > adults to lounge against such a stove.) > Her recommendation was to buy a good electric stove or cooktop instead. I > know there are some clever electrics out there now, but I’m a little > disappointed. > Thoughts? > And are the big gas stoves, like the Wolf, *really* worth having? > Thanks. > Garry

get it for your own kitchen for a vacation house get a standard boring middle of the range stove. so much easier to clean, replace lost bits, etc. — Silvasurfa who mostly hangs out at alt.architecture.int-design recently.

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – > Hi all — > I’m busy renovating a vacation house. I had heard that Wolf stoves were the > cat’s meow for serious cooking, and so I hunted until I found a used one for > the new kitchen, at a reasonable price. It’s 48" wide, four-burner plus big > griddle, and it’s a *commercial* model, and comes with a hood. > While try to decide whether to go for it (the thing is awfully big), I called > a friend who is an expert cook for some last-chance advice. She said "Don’t > do it!!!" Her reasons: > 1) Pilot-light gas stoves (like this one) are intrinsically unsafe. I am > going to be renting my house out part of the time; do I really want to be > facilitating the efforts of the renters to blow up the place? > 2) The commercial Wolf stoves have knobs that are front-facing and easy to > turn. My friend says it’s unsafe ever to allow children into the vicinity of > such a stove, unless you keep the knobs removed. (It’s also unsafe to allow > adults to lounge against such a stove.) > Her recommendation was to buy a good electric stove or cooktop instead. I > know there are some clever electrics out there now, but I’m a little > disappointed. > Thoughts? > And are the big gas stoves, like the Wolf, *really* worth having? > Thanks. > Garry

"Commercial model" as in restaurant or "Commercial Style" as in residential?  Wolf makes both and this is an important distinction. The restaurant models have little, if any, insulation.  They are cheaper than the residential models, but also have a higher BTU output – if the range will be abutting cabinetry or other combustible materials, you will have to insulate and insulate well.  You can not legally put one of these ranges (the restaurant model) into a residence in the city where I live unless an inspector signs off on the install.  Also consider that the hood should move approximately 100CFM per 10,000 BTU/Hr.  If the range has 4 25K burners and a 15K Griddle, that would mean a blower capable of 1150CFM.  Doesn’t sound like a great idea for a vacation rental.

Response:

>> I’m busy renovating a vacation house. I had heard that Wolf stoves were the > cat’s meow for serious cooking

Vacation house for you or to rent out?  Long term or short term? > While try to decide whether to go for it (the thing is awfully big), I called > a friend who is an expert cook for some last-chance advice. She said "Don’t > do it!!!" Her reasons: > 1) Pilot-light gas stoves (like this one) are intrinsically unsafe.

Huh?  I’ve had pilot light stoves and ovens and never any accident. The worst was when a pilot light went out and the plants got sick, but never enough gas for any fire or explosion. And don’t stick your finger in the outlets or bulb sockets, and … New stoves and ovens rarely have pilot lights, they have a spark igniter to start them.  (the hazard is then trying to use the oven or stove during a power fail!) You didn’t say where the house was located – if it’s rural, tanks of cooking and heating gas is common since it’s RELIABLE whereas electricity is often lost in storms. And is the house wiring capable of handling an electric oven? Is gas already used for hot water or heat? > 2) The commercial Wolf stoves have knobs that are front-facing and easy to > turn. My friend says it’s unsafe ever to allow children into the vicinity > of such a stove

I was in a company house for a while with a commercial Wolf stove. I share your enthusiasm – it was TERIFFIC! I never used a nicer griddle, made for great breakfasts. As to the hazard, perhaps there are models with the knobs on top? Do you have kids do you anticipate kids in the house? What other kid-hazards exist there?  If it’s near a cliff, perhaps they have better things to concern them :-/ > Her recommendation was to buy a good electric stove or cooktop instead.

Friends have ceramic top electric stoves and they’re definitely easy to clean, a real consderation if there are short term folks there since that tends to lead to a hotel mentality: it’s for others to clean up after them! BUT electric stoves are dangerous too: it’s easy to forget that it’s turned on! I wish they were all timed like microwave ovens to they’d always turn off. >Speaking as a fellow vacation rental owner, the last thing I would do is >equip the place with top of the line kitchen appliances.

The house the company rented was probably intended as a vacation rental. I was led to believe that the owner was a cook/chef so perhaps the large kitchen and Wolf oven was for the times (s)he used the house for events. — Jeffrey Jonas The original Dr. JCL and Mr .hide

Response:

>While try to decide whether to go for it (the thing is awfully big), I called >a friend who is an expert cook for some last-chance advice. She said "Don’t >do it!!!"

She’s right. A commercial stove is not intended for home use. Most cannot be turned down enough for typical home cooking (think along the lines of cooking absolutely as fast as possible, that’s what restaurants do). More seriously, many do *not* have insulation around them and are not rated for zero clearance up to a combustable wall. They may also be non standard depths, and will not match up to home cabinets. Some manufacturers make a home line that looks like a commercial unit, but addresses these issues. DT

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Hi all — > I’m busy renovating a vacation house. I had heard that Wolf stoves were the > cat’s meow for serious cooking, and so I hunted until I found a used one for > the new kitchen, at a reasonable price. It’s 48" wide, four-burner plus big > griddle, and it’s a *commercial* model, and comes with a hood. > While try to decide whether to go for it (the thing is awfully big), I called > a friend who is an expert cook for some last-chance advice. She said "Don’t > do it!!!" Her reasons: > 1) Pilot-light gas stoves (like this one) are intrinsically unsafe. I am > going to be renting my house out part of the time; do I really want to be > facilitating the efforts of the renters to blow up the place? > 2) The commercial Wolf stoves have knobs that are front-facing and easy to > turn. My friend says it’s unsafe ever to allow children into the vicinity of > such a stove, unless you keep the knobs removed. (It’s also unsafe to allow > adults to lounge against such a stove.) > Her recommendation was to buy a good electric stove or cooktop instead. I > know there are some clever electrics out there now, but I’m a little > disappointed. > Thoughts? > And are the big gas stoves, like the Wolf, *really* worth having? > Thanks. > Garry

Speaking as a fellow vacation rental owner, the last thing I would do is equip the place with top of the line kitchen appliances.  I’d get a stove that was adequate to someone’s cooking needs while on vacation.  That is, a regular kitchen stove that you could find at a Sear’s or similar.  Believe me, the most important features in a vacation rental are central air, a washer, and dryer.  A hot tub is a really good idea too. Jack Landlord

Response:

> 1) Pilot-light gas stoves (like this one) are intrinsically unsafe. I am > going to be renting my house out part of the time; do I really want to be > facilitating the efforts of the renters to blow up the place?

Don’t be silly.  Pilot-light gas stoves have a partially charged magnet and a thermocouple which senses that the pilot is on — shutting off the gas when it isn’t.  This is a century-old technology. > 2) The commercial Wolf stoves have knobs that are front-facing and easy to > turn. My friend says it’s unsafe ever to allow children into the vicinity of > such a stove, unless you keep the knobs removed. (It’s also unsafe to allow > adults to lounge against such a stove.)

Is it an old stove?  They should be fairly hard to turn.  And you can get kiddie guards… > Her recommendation was to buy a good electric stove or cooktop instead. I > know there are some clever electrics out there now, but I’m a little > disappointed.

Screw electrics. > Thoughts? > And are the big gas stoves, like the Wolf, *really* worth having?

There are commercial-style ("Professional" line) gas ranges by Thermador, Viking, DCS, etc.  All more expensive than the commercial versions.  Another thing to consider is that commercial ranges often are not "zero-clearance" to any building material.

Response:

>>And are the big gas stoves, like the Wolf, *really* worth having?

Thre words here, insurance, insurance, insurance. If you are renting it out your insurance company are going to be really interested in you having a pilot light gas stove. There is the risk of gassing the people in their sleep if the pilot gets blown out. If the gas doesn’t do it the explosive mix in the kitchen will certainly get their attention when making the first cup of coffee. This is a no-brainer, if you are renting it, make it as idiot proof as possible, and DO tell your insurance company you are renting. The liability insurance may disuade you. — Garry PS: Responses to the group please as I almost never check the Yahoo account.

Response:

Hi all — I’m busy renovating a vacation house. I had heard that Wolf stoves were the cat’s meow for serious cooking, and so I hunted until I found a used one for the new kitchen, at a reasonable price. It’s 48" wide, four-burner plus big griddle, and it’s a *commercial* model, and comes with a hood. While try to decide whether to go for it (the thing is awfully big), I called a friend who is an expert cook for some last-chance advice. She said "Don’t do it!!!" Her reasons: 1) Pilot-light gas stoves (like this one) are intrinsically unsafe. I am going to be renting my house out part of the time; do I really want to be facilitating the efforts of the renters to blow up the place? 2) The commercial Wolf stoves have knobs that are front-facing and easy to turn. My friend says it’s unsafe ever to allow children into the vicinity of such a stove, unless you keep the knobs removed. (It’s also unsafe to allow adults to lounge against such a stove.) Her recommendation was to buy a good electric stove or cooktop instead. I know there are some clever electrics out there now, but I’m a little disappointed. Thoughts? And are the big gas stoves, like the Wolf, *really* worth having? Thanks. Garry

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Hi all — > I’m busy renovating a vacation house. I had heard that Wolf stoves were the > cat’s meow for serious cooking, and so I hunted until I found a used one for > the new kitchen, at a reasonable price. It’s 48" wide, four-burner plus big > griddle, and it’s a *commercial* model, and comes with a hood. > While try to decide whether to go for it (the thing is awfully big), I called > a friend who is an expert cook for some last-chance advice. She said "Don’t > do it!!!" Her reasons: > 1) Pilot-light gas stoves (like this one) are intrinsically unsafe. I am > going to be renting my house out part of the time; do I really want to be > facilitating the efforts of the renters to blow up the place? > 2) The commercial Wolf stoves have knobs that are front-facing and easy to > turn. My friend says it’s unsafe ever to allow children into the vicinity of > such a stove, unless you keep the knobs removed. (It’s also unsafe to allow > adults to lounge against such a stove.) > Her recommendation was to buy a good electric stove or cooktop instead. I > know there are some clever electrics out there now, but I’m a little > disappointed. > Thoughts? > And are the big gas stoves, like the Wolf, *really* worth having? > Thanks. > Garry

Speaking as a fellow vacation rental owner, the last thing I would do is equip the place with top of the line kitchen appliances.  I’d get a stove that was adequate to someone’s cooking needs while on vacation.  That is, a regular kitchen stove that you could find at a Sear’s or similar.  Believe me, the most important features in a vacation rental are central air, a washer, and dryer.  A hot tub is a really good idea too. Jack Landlord

Response:

>> I’m busy renovating a vacation house. I had heard that Wolf stoves were the > cat’s meow for serious cooking

Vacation house for you or to rent out?  Long term or short term? > While try to decide whether to go for it (the thing is awfully big), I called > a friend who is an expert cook for some last-chance advice. She said "Don’t > do it!!!" Her reasons: > 1) Pilot-light gas stoves (like this one) are intrinsically unsafe.

Huh?  I’ve had pilot light stoves and ovens and never any accident. The worst was when a pilot light went out and the plants got sick, but never enough gas for any fire or explosion. And don’t stick your finger in the outlets or bulb sockets, and … New stoves and ovens rarely have pilot lights, they have a spark igniter to start them.  (the hazard is then trying to use the oven or stove during a power fail!) You didn’t say where the house was located – if it’s rural, tanks of cooking and heating gas is common since it’s RELIABLE whereas electricity is often lost in storms. And is the house wiring capable of handling an electric oven? Is gas already used for hot water or heat? > 2) The commercial Wolf stoves have knobs that are front-facing and easy to > turn. My friend says it’s unsafe ever to allow children into the vicinity > of such a stove

I was in a company house for a while with a commercial Wolf stove. I share your enthusiasm – it was TERIFFIC! I never used a nicer griddle, made for great breakfasts. As to the hazard, perhaps there are models with the knobs on top? Do you have kids do you anticipate kids in the house? What other kid-hazards exist there?  If it’s near a cliff, perhaps they have better things to concern them :-/ > Her recommendation was to buy a good electric stove or cooktop instead.

Friends have ceramic top electric stoves and they’re definitely easy to clean, a real consderation if there are short term folks there since that tends to lead to a hotel mentality: it’s for others to clean up after them! BUT electric stoves are dangerous too: it’s easy to forget that it’s turned on! I wish they were all timed like microwave ovens to they’d always turn off. >Speaking as a fellow vacation rental owner, the last thing I would do is >equip the place with top of the line kitchen appliances.

The house the company rented was probably intended as a vacation rental. I was led to believe that the owner was a cook/chef so perhaps the large kitchen and Wolf oven was for the times (s)he used the house for events. — Jeffrey Jonas The original Dr. JCL and Mr .hide

Response:

> Jade, and Montague are far and away better than the others, if you are > talking commercial ranges. The heavy duty series in Vulcan, Wolf, and > Garland are all similar, and the restaurant, or economy lines are all crap. > Price competition has led all of them to manufacture as inexpensively as > possible. > Brian

Just to clarify- when I said economy lines are crap, I didn’t mean everything that I hadn’t listed. I meant the economy lines of Vulcan, Wolf and Garland.

Response:

> > "Commercial model" as in restaurant or "Commercial Style" as in > residential?  Wolf makes both and this is an important distinction. > Wolf used to make models for the home, but they no longer do.  All their > current products are true commercial models. > Cheers, > Eric

The Wolf residential line was purchased by Sub-Zero about 2 years ago.  The product is relatively unchanged and is most certainly still being manufactured. You are right in that Wolf commercial and Wolf residential are now under totally separate entities.

Response:

Baloney, Baloney, Baloney. As a landlord with a fair number of units, I know firsthand that insurance companies care less about stove pilot lights. The hazards of having a pilot light is virtually nil. An unlit pilot releases so little gas that an explosion or asphyxiation is almost unheard of. That’s not just my opinion, it’s also the opinion of my local gas company and their techs.  A recent condo explosion made the local news and an analysis of gas explosions followed. Virtually all such explosions occur because of a leak OUTSIDE the building due to a cracked main, etc. In some cases the gas released from such a leak travels into the basement, collects and finally is ignited. An unlit gas pilot light creates far more "smell" than hazard. The smell is intentional. It’s due to a chemical odor added to the gas. I tend to buy low end gas ranges becasue tenants take little care of any range. Most of the low end ranges still use pilot lights – something I like because it keeps their construction simple and they don’t need electric power. The American Gas Association certifies the safety of gas appliances. They rate those using pilot lights as just a safe as ones with electronic ignition. The only advantage of electronic or spark ignition is a SLIGHT savings of energy consumption. All of you guys who worry about pilot lights better get rid of your gas water heaters. Doug – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->>And are the big gas stoves, like the Wolf, *really* worth having? >Thre words here, insurance, insurance, insurance. If you are renting >it out your insurance company are going to be really interested in you >having a pilot light gas stove. >There is the risk of gassing the people in their sleep if the pilot >gets blown out. If the gas doesn’t do it the explosive mix in the >kitchen will certainly get their attention when making the first cup >of coffee. >This is a no-brainer, if you are renting it, make it as idiot proof as >possible, and DO tell your insurance company you are renting. The >liability insurance may disuade you.

Response:

>While try to decide whether to go for it (the thing is awfully big), I called >a friend who is an expert cook for some last-chance advice. She said "Don’t >do it!!!"

She’s right. A commercial stove is not intended for home use. Most cannot be turned down enough for typical home cooking (think along the lines of cooking absolutely as fast as possible, that’s what restaurants do). More seriously, many do *not* have insulation around them and are not rated for zero clearance up to a combustable wall. They may also be non standard depths, and will not match up to home cabinets. Some manufacturers make a home line that looks like a commercial unit, but addresses these issues. DT

Response:

>>And are the big gas stoves, like the Wolf, *really* worth having?

Thre words here, insurance, insurance, insurance. If you are renting it out your insurance company are going to be really interested in you having a pilot light gas stove. There is the risk of gassing the people in their sleep if the pilot gets blown out. If the gas doesn’t do it the explosive mix in the kitchen will certainly get their attention when making the first cup of coffee. This is a no-brainer, if you are renting it, make it as idiot proof as possible, and DO tell your insurance company you are renting. The liability insurance may disuade you. — Garry PS: Responses to the group please as I almost never check the Yahoo account.

Response:

> 1) Pilot-light gas stoves (like this one) are intrinsically unsafe. I am > going to be renting my house out part of the time; do I really want to be > facilitating the efforts of the renters to blow up the place?

Don’t be silly.  Pilot-light gas stoves have a partially charged magnet and a thermocouple which senses that the pilot is on — shutting off the gas when it isn’t.  This is a century-old technology. > 2) The commercial Wolf stoves have knobs that are front-facing and easy to > turn. My friend says it’s unsafe ever to allow children into the vicinity of > such a stove, unless you keep the knobs removed. (It’s also unsafe to allow > adults to lounge against such a stove.)

Is it an old stove?  They should be fairly hard to turn.  And you can get kiddie guards… > Her recommendation was to buy a good electric stove or cooktop instead. I > know there are some clever electrics out there now, but I’m a little > disappointed.

Screw electrics. > Thoughts? > And are the big gas stoves, like the Wolf, *really* worth having?

There are commercial-style ("Professional" line) gas ranges by Thermador, Viking, DCS, etc.  All more expensive than the commercial versions.  Another thing to consider is that commercial ranges often are not "zero-clearance" to any building material.

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Hi all — > I’m busy renovating a vacation house. I had heard that Wolf stoves were the > cat’s meow for serious cooking, and so I hunted until I found a used one for > the new kitchen, at a reasonable price. It’s 48" wide, four-burner plus big > griddle, and it’s a *commercial* model, and comes with a hood. > While try to decide whether to go for it (the thing is awfully big), I called > a friend who is an expert cook for some last-chance advice. She said "Don’t > do it!!!" Her reasons: > 1) Pilot-light gas stoves (like this one) are intrinsically unsafe. I am > going to be renting my house out part of the time; do I really want to be > facilitating the efforts of the renters to blow up the place? > 2) The commercial Wolf stoves have knobs that are front-facing and easy to > turn. My friend says it’s unsafe ever to allow children into the vicinity of > such a stove, unless you keep the knobs removed. (It’s also unsafe to allow > adults to lounge against such a stove.) > Her recommendation was to buy a good electric stove or cooktop instead. I > know there are some clever electrics out there now, but I’m a little > disappointed. > Thoughts? > And are the big gas stoves, like the Wolf, *really* worth having? > Thanks. > Garry

get it for your own kitchen for a vacation house get a standard boring middle of the range stove. so much easier to clean, replace lost bits, etc. — Silvasurfa who mostly hangs out at alt.architecture.int-design recently.

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – > Hi all — > I’m busy renovating a vacation house. I had heard that Wolf stoves were the > cat’s meow for serious cooking, and so I hunted until I found a used one for > the new kitchen, at a reasonable price. It’s 48" wide, four-burner plus big > griddle, and it’s a *commercial* model, and comes with a hood. > While try to decide whether to go for it (the thing is awfully big), I called > a friend who is an expert cook for some last-chance advice. She said "Don’t > do it!!!" Her reasons: > 1) Pilot-light gas stoves (like this one) are intrinsically unsafe. I am > going to be renting my house out part of the time; do I really want to be > facilitating the efforts of the renters to blow up the place? > 2) The commercial Wolf stoves have knobs that are front-facing and easy to > turn. My friend says it’s unsafe ever to allow children into the vicinity of > such a stove, unless you keep the knobs removed. (It’s also unsafe to allow > adults to lounge against such a stove.) > Her recommendation was to buy a good electric stove or cooktop instead. I > know there are some clever electrics out there now, but I’m a little > disappointed. > Thoughts? > And are the big gas stoves, like the Wolf, *really* worth having? > Thanks. > Garry

"Commercial model" as in restaurant or "Commercial Style" as in residential?  Wolf makes both and this is an important distinction. The restaurant models have little, if any, insulation.  They are cheaper than the residential models, but also have a higher BTU output – if the range will be abutting cabinetry or other combustible materials, you will have to insulate and insulate well.  You can not legally put one of these ranges (the restaurant model) into a residence in the city where I live unless an inspector signs off on the install.  Also consider that the hood should move approximately 100CFM per 10,000 BTU/Hr.  If the range has 4 25K burners and a 15K Griddle, that would mean a blower capable of 1150CFM.  Doesn’t sound like a great idea for a vacation rental.

Response:

> Thoughts? > And are the big gas stoves, like the Wolf, *really* worth having?

That depends on your interest in cooking AND local zoning laws. Check with your community’s zoning department.

Response:

>> 1) Pilot-light gas stoves (like this one) are intrinsically unsafe. I am > going to be renting my house out part of the time; do I really want to be > facilitating the efforts of the renters to blow up the place? > Don’t be silly.  Pilot-light gas stoves have a partially charged > magnet and a thermocouple which senses that the pilot is on — shutting > off the gas when it isn’t.  This is a century-old technology.

   …. with the caveat "When they work".   As we found with our 50 year old gas furnace that filled the house with gas after the pilot light blew, when we were on vacation.   Obviously they work 99.9999999999% of the time, but when they don’t, well, that is one more thing to worry about in a frequently unoccupied house. – Rich

Response:

Re commercial gas stoves: Yipes! A veritable hornet’s nest of thoughtful, well-reasoned opinions! Let me clarify a couple things. My intentions for the house are apparently important. Those are:    a) My vacation use. I have frequent big social gatherings. A stove that       really heats and an oven that holds a lot of stuff would both be       wonderful to have. I am reacting against my present living       arrangements.:)    b) Rental use. I hope for it to be a high-end rental. If the customer       walks in, looks at the groovy stove, and says "Ooh! This *must* be       a good house!", well, so be it. I’ll accept their money. They’re not       going to react that way for an electric.    c) Sale. There’s about a 50% chance I’ll need to sell it in a couple       years. Be nice if those customers "ooh" and "aah" the same way as       the rental customers. If not the Wolf, then what? Re the hood: it’s a 54" non-commercial "Vent-a-Hood" brand, with the quiet fans. Re the insulation: I know the commercial stoves are less insulated; I think I can work it out. Re the price: asking price was $1000 for the hood and the stove together, in very good condition. Both stainless steel. thanks, Garry PS – Hm. I see in today’s paper that the seller just raised the price.

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->Hi all — >I’m busy renovating a vacation house. I had heard that Wolf stoves were the >cat’s meow for serious cooking, and so I hunted until I found a used one for >the new kitchen, at a reasonable price. It’s 48" wide, four-burner plus big >griddle, and it’s a *commercial* model, and comes with a hood. >While try to decide whether to go for it (the thing is awfully big), I called >a friend who is an expert cook for some last-chance advice. She said "Don’t >do it!!!" Her reasons: >1) Pilot-light gas stoves (like this one) are intrinsically unsafe. I am >going to be renting my house out part of the time; do I really want to be >facilitating the efforts of the renters to blow up the place? >2) The commercial Wolf stoves have knobs that are front-facing and easy to >turn. My friend says it’s unsafe ever to allow children into the vicinity of >such a stove, unless you keep the knobs removed. (It’s also unsafe to allow >adults to lounge against such a stove.) >Her recommendation was to buy a good electric stove or cooktop instead. I >know there are some clever electrics out there now, but I’m a little >disappointed. >Thoughts? >And are the big gas stoves, like the Wolf, *really* worth having?

Wolf is built like a tank, for heavy duty use.  Not much as looks go to blend in with domestic kitchen cabinets and decor.  You don’t hear of them blowing up in restaurants where conditions are far more hazardous,  so the gas pilot light  caution is alarmist.  Unless you have a gas leak in the house.  As for the other objections do you have kids or adults who will fool around with kitched appliance knobs?  No? Then all  this boils down to is will it look good in your kitchen?

Response:

> "Commercial model" as in restaurant or "Commercial Style" as in > residential?  Wolf makes both and this is an important distinction.

Wolf used to make models for the home, but they no longer do.  All their current products are true commercial models. Cheers, Eric

Response:

>1) Pilot-light gas stoves (like this one) are intrinsically unsafe. … >2) The commercial Wolf stoves have knobs that are front-facing and easy to >turn. My friend says it’s unsafe ever to allow children into the vicinity of >such a stove, unless you keep the knobs removed. (It’s also unsafe to allow >adults to lounge against such a stove.)

Jeez, your ‘friend’ is a real "consumer reports" type, scared, frightened of all the bizarre and far fetched things that might happen if life unless someone else takes the responsibility for her own safety. Millions and millions of appliances have pilot lights.  Have for a century or so.  Yes every once in a very great while someone might have a problem with one.  Every once in a great while other perils happen also.  This is ludicrous.  A bigger problem is gas burners being left on (with no flame) in non-pilot stoves, oh well. Small children should also not play with sharp knives or stick their fingers in the outlets (but somehow we encourage them to climb trees?).  Adults "ALLOWED" to lounge against the stove?  You lean on a hot stove you should get your ass burned.  You can’t be serious.  Your adult friends can’t be ALLOWED near a stove knob? If you actual take any of her advice seriously, no, you should not have the stove, and your friends need to be institutionalized as they are clearly incompetent. mho, -v.

Response:

Gerry For increased safety, Garland offers electronic ignition as an option on most ranges. This will also save you $$ on gas when not in residence. Garland is considered to be one of the top four pro ranges (Vulcan, Garland, Wolf, and Jade) Colin – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – > Re commercial gas stoves: > Yipes! A veritable hornet’s nest of thoughtful, well-reasoned opinions! > Let me clarify a couple things. My intentions for the house are apparently > important. Those are: >    a) My vacation use. I have frequent big social gatherings. A stove that >       really heats and an oven that holds a lot of stuff would both be >       wonderful to have. I am reacting against my present living >       arrangements.:) >    b) Rental use. I hope for it to be a high-end rental. If the customer >       walks in, looks at the groovy stove, and says "Ooh! This *must* be >       a good house!", well, so be it. I’ll accept their money. They’re not >       going to react that way for an electric. >    c) Sale. There’s about a 50% chance I’ll need to sell it in a couple >       years. Be nice if those customers "ooh" and "aah" the same way as >       the rental customers. > If not the Wolf, then what? > Re the hood: it’s a 54" non-commercial "Vent-a-Hood" brand, with the quiet > fans. > Re the insulation: I know the commercial stoves are less insulated; I think I > can work it out. > Re the price: asking price was $1000 for the hood and the stove together, in > very good condition. Both stainless steel. > thanks, > Garry > PS – Hm. I see in today’s paper that the seller just raised the price.

Response:

> Gerry > For increased safety, Garland offers electronic ignition as an option on > most ranges. This will also save you $$ on gas when not in residence. > Garland is considered to be one of the top four pro ranges (Vulcan, > Garland, Wolf, and Jade) > Colin

You forgot Imperial. Jack Stove

Response:

> > Garland is considered to be one of the top four pro ranges (Vulcan, > Garland, Wolf, and Jade) > Colin > You forgot Imperial.

Jade, and Montague are far and away better than the others, if you are talking commercial ranges. The heavy duty series in Vulcan, Wolf, and Garland are all similar, and the restaurant, or economy lines are all crap. Price competition has led all of them to manufacture as inexpensively as possible. Brian

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> > Garland is considered to be one of the top four pro ranges (Vulcan, > > Garland, Wolf, and Jade) > > Colin > You forgot Imperial. > Jade, and Montague are far and away better than the others, if you are > talking commercial ranges. The heavy duty series in Vulcan, Wolf, and > Garland are all similar, and the restaurant, or economy lines are all crap. > Price competition has led all of them to manufacture as inexpensively as > possible. > Brian

Restaurants around here are using Imperials.  I used one myself for 8 years. I don’t agree with you there. Jack Stove

Response:

> Restaurants around here are using Imperials.  I used one myself for 8 years. > I don’t agree with you there. > Jack Stove

Where are you? I don’t see any Imperials around here. Could also be bad local reps. Maybe a regional thing? If they don’t warehouse in the Midwest, shipping may be cost prohibitive. Brian

Response:

<Garland is considered to be one of the top four pro ranges (Vulcan, <Garland, Wolf, and Jade) Where did you get that idea? —                                          Regards,                                          David War is God’s way of teaching Americans geography.         -Ambrose Bierce "What would life be without arithmetic, but a scene of horrors?"                        -Rev. Sydney Smith, letter to young lady, 22 July 1835 Department of Philosophy & Religion NCSU Box 8103 Raleigh, 27695-8103

Response:

>>>Garland is considered to be one of the top four pro ranges (Vulcan, >>Garland, Wolf, and Jade) >>Colin >You forgot Imperial. > Jade, and Montague are far and away better than the others,

Those would be my first choices, yeah.  A Montague cooking island with 12 burners, a hotel broiler, salamanders above, a couple of fryolaters, and six ovens.  Now you’re talking.

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – > Hi all — > I’m busy renovating a vacation house. I had heard that Wolf stoves were the > cat’s meow for serious cooking, and so I hunted until I found a used one for > the new kitchen, at a reasonable price. It’s 48" wide, four-burner plus big > griddle, and it’s a *commercial* model, and comes with a hood. > While try to decide whether to go for it (the thing is awfully big), I called > a friend who is an expert cook for some last-chance advice. She said "Don’t > do it!!!" Her reasons: > 1) Pilot-light gas stoves (like this one) are intrinsically unsafe. I am > going to be renting my house out part of the time; do I really want to be > facilitating the efforts of the renters to blow up the place? > 2) The commercial Wolf stoves have knobs that are front-facing and easy to > turn. My friend says it’s unsafe ever to allow children into the vicinity of > such a stove, unless you keep the knobs removed. (It’s also unsafe to allow > adults to lounge against such a stove.) > Her recommendation was to buy a good electric stove or cooktop instead. I > know there are some clever electrics out there now, but I’m a little > disappointed. > Thoughts? > And are the big gas stoves, like the Wolf, *really* worth having? > Thanks. > Garry

There’s nothing particularly unsafe with a pilot light if the house is occupied.  A good thing about them is that you can use the oven even if the electricity is out.  And if you were not going to rent the place out, you could just shut off the gas to the stove when the home is empty.  But you can’t depend on the renters to light the pilot light when they get there and turn the gas valve off before they leave.  IMHO, that shoots down the idea right there. You probably don’t really have a 48" stove opening, and certainly don’t have an appropriate vent hood. If you really want gas, get a new stove with sealed burners.  You can get a really nice one with a high-output front burner for about $400.  Otherwise go with electric (assuming you have an adequate electrical service). I would like to have a 36" or bigger gas stove with 15K BTU burners and a griddle and a convection oven in my home, but I wouldn’t want one in a rent house. Best regards, Bob

Response:

Hi all — I’m busy renovating a vacation house. I had heard that Wolf stoves were the cat’s meow for serious cooking, and so I hunted until I found a used one for the new kitchen, at a reasonable price. It’s 48" wide, four-burner plus big griddle, and it’s a *commercial* model, and comes with a hood. While try to decide whether to go for it (the thing is awfully big), I called a friend who is an expert cook for some last-chance advice. She said "Don’t do it!!!" Her reasons: 1) Pilot-light gas stoves (like this one) are intrinsically unsafe. I am going to be renting my house out part of the time; do I really want to be facilitating the efforts of the renters to blow up the place? 2) The commercial Wolf stoves have knobs that are front-facing and easy to turn. My friend says it’s unsafe ever to allow children into the vicinity of such a stove, unless you keep the knobs removed. (It’s also unsafe to allow adults to lounge against such a stove.) Her recommendation was to buy a good electric stove or cooktop instead. I know there are some clever electrics out there now, but I’m a little disappointed. Thoughts? And are the big gas stoves, like the Wolf, *really* worth having? Thanks. Garry

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Hi all — > I’m busy renovating a vacation house. I had heard that Wolf stoves were the > cat’s meow for serious cooking, and so I hunted until I found a used one for > the new kitchen, at a reasonable price. It’s 48" wide, four-burner plus big > griddle, and it’s a *commercial* model, and comes with a hood. > While try to decide whether to go for it (the thing is awfully big), I called > a friend who is an expert cook for some last-chance advice. She said "Don’t > do it!!!" Her reasons: > 1) Pilot-light gas stoves (like this one) are intrinsically unsafe. I am > going to be renting my house out part of the time; do I really want to be > facilitating the efforts of the renters to blow up the place? > 2) The commercial Wolf stoves have knobs that are front-facing and easy to > turn. My friend says it’s unsafe ever to allow children into the vicinity of > such a stove, unless you keep the knobs removed. (It’s also unsafe to allow > adults to lounge against such a stove.) > Her recommendation was to buy a good electric stove or cooktop instead. I > know there are some clever electrics out there now, but I’m a little > disappointed. > Thoughts? > And are the big gas stoves, like the Wolf, *really* worth having? > Thanks. > Garry

Speaking as a fellow vacation rental owner, the last thing I would do is equip the place with top of the line kitchen appliances.  I’d get a stove that was adequate to someone’s cooking needs while on vacation.  That is, a regular kitchen stove that you could find at a Sear’s or similar.  Believe me, the most important features in a vacation rental are central air, a washer, and dryer.  A hot tub is a really good idea too. Jack Landlord

Response:

>> I’m busy renovating a vacation house. I had heard that Wolf stoves were the > cat’s meow for serious cooking

Vacation house for you or to rent out?  Long term or short term? > While try to decide whether to go for it (the thing is awfully big), I called > a friend who is an expert cook for some last-chance advice. She said "Don’t > do it!!!" Her reasons: > 1) Pilot-light gas stoves (like this one) are intrinsically unsafe.

Huh?  I’ve had pilot light stoves and ovens and never any accident. The worst was when a pilot light went out and the plants got sick, but never enough gas for any fire or explosion. And don’t stick your finger in the outlets or bulb sockets, and … New stoves and ovens rarely have pilot lights, they have a spark igniter to start them.  (the hazard is then trying to use the oven or stove during a power fail!) You didn’t say where the house was located – if it’s rural, tanks of cooking and heating gas is common since it’s RELIABLE whereas electricity is often lost in storms. And is the house wiring capable of handling an electric oven? Is gas already used for hot water or heat? > 2) The commercial Wolf stoves have knobs that are front-facing and easy to > turn. My friend says it’s unsafe ever to allow children into the vicinity > of such a stove

I was in a company house for a while with a commercial Wolf stove. I share your enthusiasm – it was TERIFFIC! I never used a nicer griddle, made for great breakfasts. As to the hazard, perhaps there are models with the knobs on top? Do you have kids do you anticipate kids in the house? What other kid-hazards exist there?  If it’s near a cliff, perhaps they have better things to concern them :-/ > Her recommendation was to buy a good electric stove or cooktop instead.

Friends have ceramic top electric stoves and they’re definitely easy to clean, a real consderation if there are short term folks there since that tends to lead to a hotel mentality: it’s for others to clean up after them! BUT electric stoves are dangerous too: it’s easy to forget that it’s turned on! I wish they were all timed like microwave ovens to they’d always turn off. >Speaking as a fellow vacation rental owner, the last thing I would do is >equip the place with top of the line kitchen appliances.

The house the company rented was probably intended as a vacation rental. I was led to believe that the owner was a cook/chef so perhaps the large kitchen and Wolf oven was for the times (s)he used the house for events. — Jeffrey Jonas The original Dr. JCL and Mr .hide

Response:

> Jade, and Montague are far and away better than the others, if you are > talking commercial ranges. The heavy duty series in Vulcan, Wolf, and > Garland are all similar, and the restaurant, or economy lines are all crap. > Price competition has led all of them to manufacture as inexpensively as > possible. > Brian

Just to clarify- when I said economy lines are crap, I didn’t mean everything that I hadn’t listed. I meant the economy lines of Vulcan, Wolf and Garland.

Response:

> > "Commercial model" as in restaurant or "Commercial Style" as in > residential?  Wolf makes both and this is an important distinction. > Wolf used to make models for the home, but they no longer do.  All their > current products are true commercial models. > Cheers, > Eric

The Wolf residential line was purchased by Sub-Zero about 2 years ago.  The product is relatively unchanged and is most certainly still being manufactured. You are right in that Wolf commercial and Wolf residential are now under totally separate entities.

Response:

Baloney, Baloney, Baloney. As a landlord with a fair number of units, I know firsthand that insurance companies care less about stove pilot lights. The hazards of having a pilot light is virtually nil. An unlit pilot releases so little gas that an explosion or asphyxiation is almost unheard of. That’s not just my opinion, it’s also the opinion of my local gas company and their techs.  A recent condo explosion made the local news and an analysis of gas explosions followed. Virtually all such explosions occur because of a leak OUTSIDE the building due to a cracked main, etc. In some cases the gas released from such a leak travels into the basement, collects and finally is ignited. An unlit gas pilot light creates far more "smell" than hazard. The smell is intentional. It’s due to a chemical odor added to the gas. I tend to buy low end gas ranges becasue tenants take little care of any range. Most of the low end ranges still use pilot lights – something I like because it keeps their construction simple and they don’t need electric power. The American Gas Association certifies the safety of gas appliances. They rate those using pilot lights as just a safe as ones with electronic ignition. The only advantage of electronic or spark ignition is a SLIGHT savings of energy consumption. All of you guys who worry about pilot lights better get rid of your gas water heaters. Doug – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->>And are the big gas stoves, like the Wolf, *really* worth having? >Thre words here, insurance, insurance, insurance. If you are renting >it out your insurance company are going to be really interested in you >having a pilot light gas stove. >There is the risk of gassing the people in their sleep if the pilot >gets blown out. If the gas doesn’t do it the explosive mix in the >kitchen will certainly get their attention when making the first cup >of coffee. >This is a no-brainer, if you are renting it, make it as idiot proof as >possible, and DO tell your insurance company you are renting. The >liability insurance may disuade you.

Response:

>While try to decide whether to go for it (the thing is awfully big), I called >a friend who is an expert cook for some last-chance advice. She said "Don’t >do it!!!"

She’s right. A commercial stove is not intended for home use. Most cannot be turned down enough for typical home cooking (think along the lines of cooking absolutely as fast as possible, that’s what restaurants do). More seriously, many do *not* have insulation around them and are not rated for zero clearance up to a combustable wall. They may also be non standard depths, and will not match up to home cabinets. Some manufacturers make a home line that looks like a commercial unit, but addresses these issues. DT

Response:

>>And are the big gas stoves, like the Wolf, *really* worth having?

Thre words here, insurance, insurance, insurance. If you are renting it out your insurance company are going to be really interested in you having a pilot light gas stove. There is the risk of gassing the people in their sleep if the pilot gets blown out. If the gas doesn’t do it the explosive mix in the kitchen will certainly get their attention when making the first cup of coffee. This is a no-brainer, if you are renting it, make it as idiot proof as possible, and DO tell your insurance company you are renting. The liability insurance may disuade you. — Garry PS: Responses to the group please as I almost never check the Yahoo account.

Response:

> 1) Pilot-light gas stoves (like this one) are intrinsically unsafe. I am > going to be renting my house out part of the time; do I really want to be > facilitating the efforts of the renters to blow up the place?

Don’t be silly.  Pilot-light gas stoves have a partially charged magnet and a thermocouple which senses that the pilot is on — shutting off the gas when it isn’t.  This is a century-old technology. > 2) The commercial Wolf stoves have knobs that are front-facing and easy to > turn. My friend says it’s unsafe ever to allow children into the vicinity of > such a stove, unless you keep the knobs removed. (It’s also unsafe to allow > adults to lounge against such a stove.)

Is it an old stove?  They should be fairly hard to turn.  And you can get kiddie guards… > Her recommendation was to buy a good electric stove or cooktop instead. I > know there are some clever electrics out there now, but I’m a little > disappointed.

Screw electrics. > Thoughts? > And are the big gas stoves, like the Wolf, *really* worth having?

There are commercial-style ("Professional" line) gas ranges by Thermador, Viking, DCS, etc.  All more expensive than the commercial versions.  Another thing to consider is that commercial ranges often are not "zero-clearance" to any building material.

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Hi all — > I’m busy renovating a vacation house. I had heard that Wolf stoves were the > cat’s meow for serious cooking, and so I hunted until I found a used one for > the new kitchen, at a reasonable price. It’s 48" wide, four-burner plus big > griddle, and it’s a *commercial* model, and comes with a hood. > While try to decide whether to go for it (the thing is awfully big), I called > a friend who is an expert cook for some last-chance advice. She said "Don’t > do it!!!" Her reasons: > 1) Pilot-light gas stoves (like this one) are intrinsically unsafe. I am > going to be renting my house out part of the time; do I really want to be > facilitating the efforts of the renters to blow up the place? > 2) The commercial Wolf stoves have knobs that are front-facing and easy to > turn. My friend says it’s unsafe ever to allow children into the vicinity of > such a stove, unless you keep the knobs removed. (It’s also unsafe to allow > adults to lounge against such a stove.) > Her recommendation was to buy a good electric stove or cooktop instead. I > know there are some clever electrics out there now, but I’m a little > disappointed. > Thoughts? > And are the big gas stoves, like the Wolf, *really* worth having? > Thanks. > Garry

get it for your own kitchen for a vacation house get a standard boring middle of the range stove. so much easier to clean, replace lost bits, etc. — Silvasurfa who mostly hangs out at alt.architecture.int-design recently.

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – > Hi all — > I’m busy renovating a vacation house. I had heard that Wolf stoves were the > cat’s meow for serious cooking, and so I hunted until I found a used one for > the new kitchen, at a reasonable price. It’s 48" wide, four-burner plus big > griddle, and it’s a *commercial* model, and comes with a hood. > While try to decide whether to go for it (the thing is awfully big), I called > a friend who is an expert cook for some last-chance advice. She said "Don’t > do it!!!" Her reasons: > 1) Pilot-light gas stoves (like this one) are intrinsically unsafe. I am > going to be renting my house out part of the time; do I really want to be > facilitating the efforts of the renters to blow up the place? > 2) The commercial Wolf stoves have knobs that are front-facing and easy to > turn. My friend says it’s unsafe ever to allow children into the vicinity of > such a stove, unless you keep the knobs removed. (It’s also unsafe to allow > adults to lounge against such a stove.) > Her recommendation was to buy a good electric stove or cooktop instead. I > know there are some clever electrics out there now, but I’m a little > disappointed. > Thoughts? > And are the big gas stoves, like the Wolf, *really* worth having? > Thanks. > Garry

"Commercial model" as in restaurant or "Commercial Style" as in residential?  Wolf makes both and this is an important distinction. The restaurant models have little, if any, insulation.  They are cheaper than the residential models, but also have a higher BTU output – if the range will be abutting cabinetry or other combustible materials, you will have to insulate and insulate well.  You can not legally put one of these ranges (the restaurant model) into a residence in the city where I live unless an inspector signs off on the install.  Also consider that the hood should move approximately 100CFM per 10,000 BTU/Hr.  If the range has 4 25K burners and a 15K Griddle, that would mean a blower capable of 1150CFM.  Doesn’t sound like a great idea for a vacation rental.

Response:

> Thoughts? > And are the big gas stoves, like the Wolf, *really* worth having?

That depends on your interest in cooking AND local zoning laws. Check with your community’s zoning department.

Response:

>> 1) Pilot-light gas stoves (like this one) are intrinsically unsafe. I am > going to be renting my house out part of the time; do I really want to be > facilitating the efforts of the renters to blow up the place? > Don’t be silly.  Pilot-light gas stoves have a partially charged > magnet and a thermocouple which senses that the pilot is on — shutting > off the gas when it isn’t.  This is a century-old technology.

   …. with the caveat "When they work".   As we found with our 50 year old gas furnace that filled the house with gas after the pilot light blew, when we were on vacation.   Obviously they work 99.9999999999% of the time, but when they don’t, well, that is one more thing to worry about in a frequently unoccupied house. – Rich

Response:

Re commercial gas stoves: Yipes! A veritable hornet’s nest of thoughtful, well-reasoned opinions! Let me clarify a couple things. My intentions for the house are apparently important. Those are:    a) My vacation use. I have frequent big social gatherings. A stove that       really heats and an oven that holds a lot of stuff would both be       wonderful to have. I am reacting against my present living       arrangements.:)    b) Rental use. I hope for it to be a high-end rental. If the customer       walks in, looks at the groovy stove, and says "Ooh! This *must* be       a good house!", well, so be it. I’ll accept their money. They’re not       going to react that way for an electric.    c) Sale. There’s about a 50% chance I’ll need to sell it in a couple       years. Be nice if those customers "ooh" and "aah" the same way as       the rental customers. If not the Wolf, then what? Re the hood: it’s a 54" non-commercial "Vent-a-Hood" brand, with the quiet fans. Re the insulation: I know the commercial stoves are less insulated; I think I can work it out. Re the price: asking price was $1000 for the hood and the stove together, in very good condition. Both stainless steel. thanks, Garry PS – Hm. I see in today’s paper that the seller just raised the price.

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->Hi all — >I’m busy renovating a vacation house. I had heard that Wolf stoves were the >cat’s meow for serious cooking, and so I hunted until I found a used one for >the new kitchen, at a reasonable price. It’s 48" wide, four-burner plus big >griddle, and it’s a *commercial* model, and comes with a hood. >While try to decide whether to go for it (the thing is awfully big), I called >a friend who is an expert cook for some last-chance advice. She said "Don’t >do it!!!" Her reasons: >1) Pilot-light gas stoves (like this one) are intrinsically unsafe. I am >going to be renting my house out part of the time; do I really want to be >facilitating the efforts of the renters to blow up the place? >2) The commercial Wolf stoves have knobs that are front-facing and easy to >turn. My friend says it’s unsafe ever to allow children into the vicinity of >such a stove, unless you keep the knobs removed. (It’s also unsafe to allow >adults to lounge against such a stove.) >Her recommendation was to buy a good electric stove or cooktop instead. I >know there are some clever electrics out there now, but I’m a little >disappointed. >Thoughts? >And are the big gas stoves, like the Wolf, *really* worth having?

Wolf is built like a tank, for heavy duty use.  Not much as looks go to blend in with domestic kitchen cabinets and decor.  You don’t hear of them blowing up in restaurants where conditions are far more hazardous,  so the gas pilot light  caution is alarmist.  Unless you have a gas leak in the house.  As for the other objections do you have kids or adults who will fool around with kitched appliance knobs?  No? Then all  this boils down to is will it look good in your kitchen?

Response:

> "Commercial model" as in restaurant or "Commercial Style" as in > residential?  Wolf makes both and this is an important distinction.

Wolf used to make models for the home, but they no longer do.  All their current products are true commercial models. Cheers, Eric

Response:

>1) Pilot-light gas stoves (like this one) are intrinsically unsafe. … >2) The commercial Wolf stoves have knobs that are front-facing and easy to >turn. My friend says it’s unsafe ever to allow children into the vicinity of >such a stove, unless you keep the knobs removed. (It’s also unsafe to allow >adults to lounge against such a stove.)

Jeez, your ‘friend’ is a real "consumer reports" type, scared, frightened of all the bizarre and far fetched things that might happen if life unless someone else takes the responsibility for her own safety. Millions and millions of appliances have pilot lights.  Have for a century or so.  Yes every once in a very great while someone might have a problem with one.  Every once in a great while other perils happen also.  This is ludicrous.  A bigger problem is gas burners being left on (with no flame) in non-pilot stoves, oh well. Small children should also not play with sharp knives or stick their fingers in the outlets (but somehow we encourage them to climb trees?).  Adults "ALLOWED" to lounge against the stove?  You lean on a hot stove you should get your ass burned.  You can’t be serious.  Your adult friends can’t be ALLOWED near a stove knob? If you actual take any of her advice seriously, no, you should not have the stove, and your friends need to be institutionalized as they are clearly incompetent. mho, -v.

Response:

Gerry For increased safety, Garland offers electronic ignition as an option on most ranges. This will also save you $$ on gas when not in residence. Garland is considered to be one of the top four pro ranges (Vulcan, Garland, Wolf, and Jade) Colin – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – > Re commercial gas stoves: > Yipes! A veritable hornet’s nest of thoughtful, well-reasoned opinions! > Let me clarify a couple things. My intentions for the house are apparently > important. Those are: >    a) My vacation use. I have frequent big social gatherings. A stove that >       really heats and an oven that holds a lot of stuff would both be >       wonderful to have. I am reacting against my present living >       arrangements.:) >    b) Rental use. I hope for it to be a high-end rental. If the customer >       walks in, looks at the groovy stove, and says "Ooh! This *must* be >       a good house!", well, so be it. I’ll accept their money. They’re not >       going to react that way for an electric. >    c) Sale. There’s about a 50% chance I’ll need to sell it in a couple >       years. Be nice if those customers "ooh" and "aah" the same way as >       the rental customers. > If not the Wolf, then what? > Re the hood: it’s a 54" non-commercial "Vent-a-Hood" brand, with the quiet > fans. > Re the insulation: I know the commercial stoves are less insulated; I think I > can work it out. > Re the price: asking price was $1000 for the hood and the stove together, in > very good condition. Both stainless steel. > thanks, > Garry > PS – Hm. I see in today’s paper that the seller just raised the price.

Response:

> Gerry > For increased safety, Garland offers electronic ignition as an option on > most ranges. This will also save you $$ on gas when not in residence. > Garland is considered to be one of the top four pro ranges (Vulcan, > Garland, Wolf, and Jade) > Colin

You forgot Imperial. Jack Stove

Response:

> > Garland is considered to be one of the top four pro ranges (Vulcan, > Garland, Wolf, and Jade) > Colin > You forgot Imperial.

Jade, and Montague are far and away better than the others, if you are talking commercial ranges. The heavy duty series in Vulcan, Wolf, and Garland are all similar, and the restaurant, or economy lines are all crap. Price competition has led all of them to manufacture as inexpensively as possible. Brian

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> > Garland is considered to be one of the top four pro ranges (Vulcan, > > Garland, Wolf, and Jade) > > Colin > You forgot Imperial. > Jade, and Montague are far and away better than the others, if you are > talking commercial ranges. The heavy duty series in Vulcan, Wolf, and > Garland are all similar, and the restaurant, or economy lines are all crap. > Price competition has led all of them to manufacture as inexpensively as > possible. > Brian

Restaurants around here are using Imperials.  I used one myself for 8 years. I don’t agree with you there. Jack Stove

Response:

> Restaurants around here are using Imperials.  I used one myself for 8 years. > I don’t agree with you there. > Jack Stove

Where are you? I don’t see any Imperials around here. Could also be bad local reps. Maybe a regional thing? If they don’t warehouse in the Midwest, shipping may be cost prohibitive. Brian

Response:

<Garland is considered to be one of the top four pro ranges (Vulcan, <Garland, Wolf, and Jade) Where did you get that idea? —                                          Regards,                                          David War is God’s way of teaching Americans geography.         -Ambrose Bierce "What would life be without arithmetic, but a scene of horrors?"                        -Rev. Sydney Smith, letter to young lady, 22 July 1835 Department of Philosophy & Religion NCSU Box 8103 Raleigh, 27695-8103

Response:

>>>Garland is considered to be one of the top four pro ranges (Vulcan, >>Garland, Wolf, and Jade) >>Colin >You forgot Imperial. > Jade, and Montague are far and away better than the others,

Those would be my first choices, yeah.  A Montague cooking island with 12 burners, a hotel broiler, salamanders above, a couple of fryolaters, and six ovens.  Now you’re talking.

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – > Hi all — > I’m busy renovating a vacation house. I had heard that Wolf stoves were the > cat’s meow for serious cooking, and so I hunted until I found a used one for > the new kitchen, at a reasonable price. It’s 48" wide, four-burner plus big > griddle, and it’s a *commercial* model, and comes with a hood. > While try to decide whether to go for it (the thing is awfully big), I called > a friend who is an expert cook for some last-chance advice. She said "Don’t > do it!!!" Her reasons: > 1) Pilot-light gas stoves (like this one) are intrinsically unsafe. I am > going to be renting my house out part of the time; do I really want to be > facilitating the efforts of the renters to blow up the place? > 2) The commercial Wolf stoves have knobs that are front-facing and easy to > turn. My friend says it’s unsafe ever to allow children into the vicinity of > such a stove, unless you keep the knobs removed. (It’s also unsafe to allow > adults to lounge against such a stove.) > Her recommendation was to buy a good electric stove or cooktop instead. I > know there are some clever electrics out there now, but I’m a little > disappointed. > Thoughts? > And are the big gas stoves, like the Wolf, *really* worth having? > Thanks. > Garry

There’s nothing particularly unsafe with a pilot light if the house is occupied.  A good thing about them is that you can use the oven even if the electricity is out.  And if you were not going to rent the place out, you could just shut off the gas to the stove when the home is empty.  But you can’t depend on the renters to light the pilot light when they get there and turn the gas valve off before they leave.  IMHO, that shoots down the idea right there. You probably don’t really have a 48" stove opening, and certainly don’t have an appropriate vent hood. If you really want gas, get a new stove with sealed burners.  You can get a really nice one with a high-output front burner for about $400.  Otherwise go with electric (assuming you have an adequate electrical service). I would like to have a 36" or bigger gas stove with 15K BTU burners and a griddle and a convection oven in my home, but I wouldn’t want one in a rent house. Best regards, Bob

Response:

Hi all — I’m busy renovating a vacation house. I had heard that Wolf stoves were the cat’s meow for serious cooking, and so I hunted until I found a used one for the new kitchen, at a reasonable price. It’s 48" wide, four-burner plus big griddle, and it’s a *commercial* model, and comes with a hood. While try to decide whether to go for it (the thing is awfully big), I called a friend who is an expert cook for some last-chance advice. She said "Don’t do it!!!" Her reasons: 1) Pilot-light gas stoves (like this one) are intrinsically unsafe. I am going to be renting my house out part of the time; do I really want to be facilitating the efforts of the renters to blow up the place? 2) The commercial Wolf stoves have knobs that are front-facing and easy to turn. My friend says it’s unsafe ever to allow children into the vicinity of such a stove, unless you keep the knobs removed. (It’s also unsafe to allow adults to lounge against such a stove.) Her recommendation was to buy a good electric stove or cooktop instead. I know there are some clever electrics out there now, but I’m a little disappointed. Thoughts? And are the big gas stoves, like the Wolf, *really* worth having? Thanks. Garry

Response:

Question:

I am having a tough time with my Doctors. Please stop fighting, I need to read some good stuff my life is falling apart and I need support. We are all

Response:

>I am having a tough time with my Doctors. Please stop fighting, I need to >read some good stuff my life is falling apart and I need support. We are all

What kind of support you need Jim?   A polite comment?  I think your hair looks nice that way! A cash contribution?  I have about .06 cents I could let you have. A good joke?  Why does the Bride wear white?  So she is color coordinated with the kitchen appliances. ZombyWoof — <Insert something cute here>

Response:

Hi Jim: I’ve agreed to stop responding to the trolls here, and won’t.  I’d like to see the ng get back to support and lose the pissing contests.  I’m not equipped for those anyway! In terms of support, you know my email addy and ICQ info–just give me a holler Hnag tough.  I can relate right now.  Believe me. — ~~))))3> A dog has a soul of a philospher.  ~Plato

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> I am having a tough time with my Doctors. Please stop fighting, I need to > read some good stuff my life is falling apart and I need support. We are all

Response:

Question:

Same cleaner, different attachments. owly – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> For you folks who use the steam cleaners…do you have one JUST for the > bird stuff or do you use the same one on your stove and kitchen > appliances? > Thanks. > Tweety

Response:

Anyone use a hand steam cleaner for cleaning their cages and/or stands? Eureka has one and I am thinking of getting one.  I am wondering if it will break up and remove caked on poop. Fred

Response:

>Anyone use a hand steam cleaner for cleaning their cages and/or stands?

I have a DeLonghi steam cleaner and it’s great for removing food and poop on the cages and stands. Jayne & Pepsi (CAG) Frankie (MSC2) Peaches (MOL2)

Response:

you will find a lot of people use them here. I have on and think it is brilliant. I use a pressure washer too. The good thing about a steam cleaner is that it will sterilise as it cleans. If you have a sick bird or  take in bird, you can be sure the cages are really clean before putting a bird in it. Of course steam cleaners can do other good stuff too, like defrosting a freezer in minutes, clean bathroom tiles and windows. I love mine and have recomended one to several friends who are all as pleased with theirs. If you have the spare cash, I say go for it. —

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->Anyone use a hand steam cleaner for cleaning their cages and/or stands? > I have a DeLonghi steam cleaner and it’s great for removing food and poop on > the cages and stands. > Jayne & Pepsi (CAG) > Frankie (MSC2) > Peaches (MOL2)

Response:

>do you have one JUST for the bird >stuff or do you use the same one on your stove and kitchen appliances?

I use the same one on everything. Jayne & Pepsi (CAG) Frankie (MSC2) Peaches (MOL2)

Response:

I use my for everything that won’t melt!  ;-) – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->I have a DeLonghi steam cleaner and it’s great for removing food and poop on >the cages and stands. >Jayne & Pepsi (CAG) >Frankie (MSC2) >Peaches (MOL2) > For you folks who use the steam cleaners…do you have one JUST for the bird > stuff or do you use the same one on your stove and kitchen appliances? > Thanks. > Tweety

Response:

If you have access to Yahoo groups, there is one on steamcleaners. Members have various brands and sizes and you can get specific information. They range in cleaning ability and ease of use. RJ (who bought new cages instead of a steam cleaner — that’s next on the ’shopping’ list) – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – >Anyone use a hand steam cleaner for cleaning their cages and/or stands? >Eureka has one and I am thinking of getting one.  I am wondering if it will >break up and remove caked on poop. >Fred

Response:

>I have a DeLonghi steam cleaner and it’s great for removing food and poop on >the cages and stands. >Jayne & Pepsi (CAG) >Frankie (MSC2) >Peaches (MOL2)

For you folks who use the steam cleaners…do you have one JUST for the bird stuff or do you use the same one on your stove and kitchen appliances? Thanks. Tweety

Response:

Question:

++RANT ON++ This week I have been introduced to the effects of extreme stress on BG. They’re all over the place, I’m just glad I’m on 4 injections a day now so can get better control of them. (4-6u H 3x, 30u HI 1x) My family and I were due to move home tomorrow, but the person at the top of the chain of purchases turned round today and said that she couldn’t move until next week. The words to describe what I think of this individual if typed would probably melt my keyboard. ARRGGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!! We are completely packed and I had just finished disconnecting all my kitchen appliances (cooker, etc) when I got the call. I’ve now spent about 3 hours solid on the phone making sure that we still have electricity, gas and phone etc, as I had already informed the relevant companies that We were moving out tomorrow! Oh well I haven’t sued anyone for about 18 months, I feel a trip to the small claims court coming on to recover my losses and accrued interest on my new mortgage. I do wish I could go and get thoroughly plastered, but now I’m T1 I can’t really do that, and I can’t go on a choccie binge either! :-( ( ++RANT OFF++ On a brighter note I heard today from my solicitor that I have won a claim for injuries against a driver who rear ended me on the M25 (London Orbital Motorway for the non-Brits) doing 40 mph a couple of years ago (I was stationary in a queue of traffic. Luckily I was driving an Audi so all I sustained was an impacted knee joint. Hopefully we can still move next week Dave Townsend, T1 since 23 March 2001 Hoping someone invents a diabetic friendly form of alcohol!

Response:

so your computer is still out then …. can’t be that far into the packing eh:P

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> ++RANT ON++ > This week I have been introduced to the effects of extreme stress on BG. > They’re all over the place, I’m just glad I’m on 4 injections a day now so > can get better control of them. (4-6u H 3x, 30u HI 1x) > My family and I were due to move home tomorrow, but the person at the top of > the chain of purchases turned round today and said that she couldn’t move > until next week. The words to describe what I think of this individual if > typed would probably melt my keyboard. > ARRGGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!! > We are completely packed and I had just finished disconnecting all my > kitchen appliances (cooker, etc) when I got the call. I’ve now spent about 3 > hours solid on the phone making sure that we still have electricity, gas and > phone etc, as I had already informed the relevant companies that We were > moving out tomorrow! > Oh well I haven’t sued anyone for about 18 months, I feel a trip to the > small claims court coming on to recover my losses and accrued interest on my > new mortgage. > I do wish I could go and get thoroughly plastered, but now I’m T1 I can’t > really do that, and I can’t go on a choccie binge either! :-( ( > ++RANT OFF++ > On a brighter note I heard today from my solicitor that I have won a claim > for injuries against a driver who rear ended me on the M25 (London Orbital > Motorway for the non-Brits) doing 40 mph a couple of years ago (I was > stationary in a queue of traffic. Luckily I was driving an Audi so all I > sustained was an impacted knee joint. > Hopefully we can still move next week > Dave Townsend, T1 since 23 March 2001 > Hoping someone invents a diabetic friendly form of alcohol!

Response:

> so your computer is still out then …. can’t be that far into the packing > eh:P

There are always priorities :-)

Response:

Sorry to hear that Dave. The choccie thing must be driving you nuts at this moment! Do you remember the Cadbury’s Fruit & Nut choccie? Slurp! Slurp! Even though I don’t like choccie all that much, there was something about F&N that appealed to me. For the US readers, the M25 freeway orbits around Greater London. The best way to describe it is the world’s largest/longest parking lot. In case you think everything in the US is larger, faster, bigger, shinier, you should spend a rush hour on the M25! It is absolutely desparate driving. Not the place to have a hypo. Where are you moving to Dave, closer to the M25 perhaps?

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> ++RANT ON++ > This week I have been introduced to the effects of extreme stress on BG. > They’re all over the place, I’m just glad I’m on 4 injections a day now so > can get better control of them. (4-6u H 3x, 30u HI 1x) > My family and I were due to move home tomorrow, but the person at the top of > the chain of purchases turned round today and said that she couldn’t move > until next week. The words to describe what I think of this individual if > typed would probably melt my keyboard. > ARRGGHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!! > We are completely packed and I had just finished disconnecting all my > kitchen appliances (cooker, etc) when I got the call. I’ve now spent about 3 > hours solid on the phone making sure that we still have electricity, gas and > phone etc, as I had already informed the relevant companies that We were > moving out tomorrow! > Oh well I haven’t sued anyone for about 18 months, I feel a trip to the > small claims court coming on to recover my losses and accrued interest on my > new mortgage. > I do wish I could go and get thoroughly plastered, but now I’m T1 I can’t > really do that, and I can’t go on a choccie binge either! :-( ( > ++RANT OFF++ > On a brighter note I heard today from my solicitor that I have won a claim > for injuries against a driver who rear ended me on the M25 (London Orbital > Motorway for the non-Brits) doing 40 mph a couple of years ago (I was > stationary in a queue of traffic. Luckily I was driving an Audi so all I > sustained was an impacted knee joint. > Hopefully we can still move next week > Dave Townsend, T1 since 23 March 2001 > Hoping someone invents a diabetic friendly form of alcohol!

Response:

nah, Were moving from Keynsham (3 Bedroom 1960’s Redbrick terrace House with 20′x20′ garden –

Question:

Any sources for a clothes chute? I seem to recall seeing a door assembly for one at one of the home centers, but couldn’t locate it recently. Dennis

Response:

Besides what the fellow below says, which I hadn’t considered, a chute can be whatever you rig up that works. I’ve seen them made of metal, like a heat duct, and plywood. Just need to make sure the inside is super-smooth, to not snag clothes on the way down.  Also make sure cross section is big enough for whatever you will be stuffing down the hole. To avoid chimney risk, use tight-fitting doors at top and bottom. If you don’t want to make doors yourself, just use the front off of a small size kitchen or bathroom cabinet. Ask at your local cabinet dealer, for a damaged unit, or maybe a sample panel from a discontinued style.What works best will depend on your situation- I’ve seen them in closets or hidden in bathroom cabinets, or mounted right in wall. On bottom end, it can just end in a wall hung cabinet that serves as hamper, or dump right into a roll-around bin. (with a spring-loaded door, if fire worries you.) Oh, if small kids are in house, make sure the doors have kid-proof latches, especially if one kid or a pet is small enough to go in the hole. They WILL try it- some things are just too strong to resist. aem sends… – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->Any sources for a clothes chute? I seem to recall seeing a door assembly for >one at one of the home centers, but couldn’t locate it recently. >Dennis > Check your insurance policy & local fire code / building code before > installing a clothes chute. Lots of time structures like this are > explicitly forbidden or have criteria that must be met (they’re > essentially a chimney in a fire.) > Decide if it’s really worth the hassle & costs to drop the clothes in > a chute versus lugging a hamper around occasionally.

Response:

Also schrieb Michael F. Maggard: >Decide if it’s really worth the hassle & costs to drop the clothes in >a chute versus lugging a hamper around occasionally.

We solved the problem by putting the laundry room on the 2nd floor. :-{) — Real Programmers use ‘cat >a.out.’

Response:

>Check your insurance policy & local fire code / building code before >installing a clothes chute. Lots of time structures like this are >explicitly forbidden or have criteria that must be met (they’re >essentially a chimney in a fire.) >Decide if it’s really worth the hassle & costs to drop the clothes in >a chute versus lugging a hamper around occasionally.

In my case, the chute is already there, I just want to upgrade it. The utility room is right next to the bathroom, but you have to go down a hallway, around the corner and down 3 steps to get there. The old clothes chute (really just a swinging door into the laundry room, no chute) is OK, just a little small and homemade. I wanted a 12" x 12" swinging door unit to replace it. Thanks, DT

Response:

Our 1958 house has one and I’d guess it is made out of furnace duct.  It works fine, though you have to stick large things in (bath towels) carefully. -drl — Derek R. Larson           Indiana University        Dept. of History  "Let me go on record as stating that Mountain Dew, although a refreshing   and enjoyable beverage, is NOT A CONTRACEPTIVE."  -Ann Landers

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->Any sources for a clothes chute? I seem to recall seeing a door assembly for >one at one of the home centers, but couldn’t locate it recently. >Dennis > Check your insurance policy & local fire code / building code before > installing a clothes chute. Lots of time structures like this are > explicitly forbidden or have criteria that must be met (they’re > essentially a chimney in a fire.) > Decide if it’s really worth the hassle & costs to drop the clothes in > a chute versus lugging a hamper around occasionally.

My chute has a spring loaded door at the top end. You push the clothes in and when you remove your hand the door snaps shut. I don’t think there would be much chimney effect going on with mine. Since the chute was already there when I bought the house, I can assure you there definitely has been no hassle or costs dropping clothes down the chute these past 20 years. :-) Don

Response:

>>Check your insurance policy & local fire code / building code before >installing a clothes chute. Lots of time structures like this are >explicitly forbidden or have criteria that must be met (they’re >essentially a chimney in a fire.)

Boy oh boy is that being anal retentive for a typical single family house. Yes in say a 20 story apartment building the chutes (trash, etc.) and chases must be fire rated and have significant chimney potential.  But in a typical home, the chute has no more free vertical distance than, say, the stair. A chute from the second floor to a first floor laundry would only be maybe 4 feet long, from the upstairs door sill to the downstairs ceiling.  What about the risers for the heat ducts?  A single family home doesn’t have the fire dampers a large multistory building does. The laundry chute would be better, typically it would have a door at the input end.  You could put a spring loaded one at the bottom also, if you cared to. Since a laundrty chute is generally little different from a heat duct, I’d not worry much in a residential application. >Decide if it’s really worth the hassle & costs to drop the clothes in >a chute versus lugging a hamper around occasionally.

And why should one carry the hamper at all, if one could chute it? Here, we do laundry each and every day.  A chure just doesn’t work as things don’t line up vertically (the laundry is in a one-story section of the house).  For a low initial cost (in many cases) and a savings in hassles for the rest of one’s time is residence, it would IMHO be quite worth it, if the layout allows. just mho, -v.

Response:

>No  - it’s experience

You had an experience with a chute in a single family residence voiding insurance and being illegal?  Then you should have said so, and informed and educated all of us.  As you posted it just looked like unjustified speculation. >Finally, recall that misc.consumers.house gets to more then just your >neighborhood and these things do vary around the world.

But perhaps 95% of misc.consumers.house seems to be from the US, and another 4% or so from Canada.  Over the last 20+ years in the business, I have had related experience in many ‘neighborhoods’ in several states of the US (not all, but then neither have you) and have not encountered what you suggest, nor heard of it.  And it is a reservation out of all proportion to the actual risk, for the typical low-rise single family residence, which is what I reserved my opinion to. -v.

Response:

Yea, around here too (USA).  The inspectors have become very picky about firestops.  They want everything filled tight, even where the drill holes are only slightly larger than the pipe running through it. I have no idea about the current feelings about something like a clothes chute, but they are certainly picky about everything else. I am trying to think of a case where there is an open heating duct in an unfinished basement which leads to the finished area above.  But, I can’t so I can’t comment on that aspect. Also, I had a friend fail an inspection because he installed a raceway (basically, a large conduit) from near the electrical panel in the basement up to the attic.  The inspector felt that it was a potential fire hazard (chimney affect) and made him remove it.  BTW, I have no idea why simply capping it off would not have been OK too.

Response:

Previously, Walt wrote in misc.consumers.house: – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Yea, around here too (USA).  The inspectors have become very > picky about firestops.  They want everything filled tight, > even where the drill holes are only slightly larger than the > pipe running through it. > I have no idea about the current feelings about something > like a clothes chute, but they are certainly picky about > everything else. > I am trying to think of a case where there is an open heating > duct in an unfinished basement which leads to the finished > area above.  But, I can’t so I can’t comment on that aspect. > Also, I had a friend fail an inspection because he installed > a raceway (basically, a large conduit) from near the electrical > panel in the basement up to the attic.  The inspector felt that > it was a potential fire hazard (chimney affect) and made him > remove it.  BTW, I have no idea why simply capping it off would > not have been OK too.

Our house was completed last year in Washington County, Oregon. We installed a clothes chute and the inspector never raised it as an issue. It was designed with a gravity lid at the top, so it had to be held open to insert clothes, and the bottom dropped into a basket in a closed base cabinet. We also installed a raceway from the basement to the attic. To get it approved we simply stuffed insulation in both ends of it and sealed the holes it passed through on each floor. When (if) we do use it, we’ll have to seal up both ends after pulling the wires. I felt our electrical inspector was tough, too. His final inspection lasted four hours and resulted in two pages of re-work before he would approve the job. All of his objections were over nit-picky code points (no electrical outlets on the counter in a built in hutch? Gimme a break).

Response:

> >All of his objections were over nit-picky >code points (no electrical outlets on the counter in a built in >hutch? Gimme a break). > The CO for our house was held up for a similar reason, while a > determination was made about whether the location the inspector wanted > an outlet installed was a "counter" or "peninsular" – the inspector > won!

We "negotiated" ours. The inspector was claiming the hutch was a kitchen counter, so needed outlets for kitchen appliances. Since it was in the dining room, and not the kitchen, we argued it wasn’t a kitchen counter. We already had holes in the countertop to pass cords through to outlets in the base cabinets (for answering machine, phones, etc), so we compromised by raising the outlets 8" so small appliances could be plugged in per-code.

Response:

Question:

I am building a new home, and chose the slide-in in lieu of the freestanding.  I think it has a more built-in custom look, and especially like the idea that there is no GAP between the counter and rangetop for crumbs, liquids, etc to collect. — Alan

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> I’m replacing the cooktop and wall oven in my kitchen.  Any advice, > advantages, disadvantages, etc. between a freestanding vs. slide-in > electric range? > Thanks, Jane

Response:

I think "drop-in" is best.  It gives the range a custom, built-in, look. Drop-in is similar to slide-in, except it doesn’t have the draw underneath, and instead, has a panel and toe kick matching the rest of the kitchen cabinets. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – > I’m replacing the cooktop and wall oven in my kitchen.  Any advice, > advantages, disadvantages, etc. between a freestanding vs. slide-in > electric range? > Thanks, Jane

Response:

I’m replacing the cooktop and wall oven in my kitchen.  Any advice, advantages, disadvantages, etc. between a freestanding vs. slide-in electric range? Thanks, Jane

Response:

Having just finished with our kitchen remodeled, also looked at replacing our electric cooktop and wall oven with a freestanding, or slide-in range. After considering pros and cons,  decided on a Jenn Air slide-in gas range that had a commercial stainless steel appearance.  Although we looked a only a few suppliers, including Sears, I found the best price at JACK ROBERTS APPLIANCES, an independent dealer.  The big advantage the slide-in had over the separate cooktop and wall oven option is price.  Functionality was good under either option.  A freestanding unit to me looks like what you would find in tract housing, mundane, boring and rather cheap looking, so that option wasn’t one that had much appeal.  The Jenn Air range is dual fuel, which means that the oven is electric but the stovetop gas.  I wanted gas because that’s what good cooks are supposed to like (I’m optimistic!). Since we replaced all of our kitchen appliances with new ones I took the time to research Consumer Reports.  In the end we bought what we felt were matching appliances that looked great, not too expensive, had better than average ratings.  Result is very satisfying and the food tastes better also. These are some things you might want to consider!  Art – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – >I’m replacing the cooktop and wall oven in my kitchen.  Any advice, >advantages, disadvantages, etc. between a freestanding vs. slide-in >electric range? >Thanks, Jane

Response: