Question:

  I’m going to try to soundproof my guitar room somehow,  anyone have any experience doing this?   I know that foam stuff is way$$$.   winnard

Response:

>   I’m going to try to soundproof my guitar room somehow,  anyone have any > experience doing this?   I know that foam stuff is way$$$.

**  Do you want sound treatment for the room or sound PROOFING ??      Sound proofing stops the noise getting out and disturbing others.  Sound treatment makes the room less reverberant or "live".      Sound proofing a room  is a major undertaking –  the walls, doors, windows, ceilings etc all let sound through if not very heavy, solid and airtight.

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->   I’m going to try to soundproof my guitar room somehow,  anyone have any > experience doing this?   I know that foam stuff is way$$$. > **  Do you want sound treatment for the room or sound PROOFING ??      Sound > proofing stops the noise getting out and disturbing others.  Sound treatment > makes the room less reverberant or "live". >      Sound proofing a room  is a major undertaking –  the walls, doors, > windows, ceilings etc all let sound through if not very heavy, solid and > airtight.

It can be very expensive, and it almost always results in noise reduction, not true sound proofing.  Low frequencies (bass, kick drum, even the lower couple of octaves on guitars) are especially tough to "soundproof." Where’s the room at in the house?  You want to soundproof relative to outdoors, or the rest of your home?  Are you prepared to do double walls, ceilings, doors, maybe even floor?  That’s what it would take.

Response:

>  I’m going to try to soundproof my guitar room somehow,  anyone have any >experience doing this?   I know that foam stuff is way$$$. >  winnard

The ultimate is a floated room within the room that ride on rubber or spring mounts or buy a prefab ‘iso chamber’.  Going down from that construction project, think insulation.  If this is an unfinished basement, add insulation between the ceiling beams and hang a tile ceiling and possibly roll some more insulation within the space from the tiles to the beams.  Think air-tight, too. Stay away from that gorgeous sonix stuff.  It’s great but probably best left for the DE part of a LEDE recording studio control room. — [species: human; planet: earth,milkyway(western spiral arm),alpha sector]

Response:

>   I’m going to try to soundproof my guitar room somehow,  anyone have any > experience doing this?   I know that foam stuff is way$$$. >   winnard

If it’s just a ‘guitar room’ and not a ‘band room’ you may be best off building a box and either putting your amp, a speaker, or switch to a small amp in it for (‘guitar room assumption’) recording. "Soundproofing" a room takes a lot more $ and effort. It depends on what exactly you want to do in this room, all sexual jokes aside…coulda…won’t. Soundproofing for a band practice, for example, is not a trivial task. To what degree, and the reason *why* you want soundproofing…is an important factor in offering suggestions that might work.

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> I’m going to try to soundproof my guitar room somehow,  anyone have any >experience doing this?   I know that foam stuff is way$$$. > winnard > The ultimate is a floated room within the room that ride on rubber or > spring mounts or buy a prefab ‘iso chamber’.  Going down from that > construction project, think insulation.  If this is an unfinished basement, > add insulation between the ceiling beams and hang a tile ceiling and > possibly roll some more insulation within the space from the tiles to the > beams.  Think air-tight, too. > Stay away from that gorgeous sonix stuff.  It’s great but probably best > left for the DE part of a LEDE recording studio control room.

I always thought that cool foam was to (to some degree) break up standing waves (there are cheaper ways to do this) and generally deaden a small area for recording….not for soundproofing, per se. *Design* is important for soundproofing…a lot can be done with a little design, some insulation, and some drywall and carpet. Particularly if you have the freedom to finish an unfinished basement to be ’soundproof’ above all other concerns.

Response:

>Soundproofing for a band practice, for example, >is not a trivial task.

Agreed.  If you go full soundproof/floated room don’t forget to add an air conditioning system with maybe a humidity control so the 9′ steinway grand piano is kept happy. Pure mass is what blocks bass frequencies…  As in, multilayers of heavy sheetrock liquid nailed and sealed together. — [species: human; planet: earth,milkyway(western spiral arm),alpha sector]

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> >   I’m going to try to soundproof my guitar room somehow,  anyone have any > > experience doing this?   I know that foam stuff is way$$$. > **  Do you want sound treatment for the room or sound PROOFING ?? Sound > proofing stops the noise getting out and disturbing others.  Sound treatment > makes the room less reverberant or "live". >      Sound proofing a room  is a major undertaking –  the walls, doors, > windows, ceilings etc all let sound through if not very heavy, solid and > airtight. > It can be very expensive, and it almost always results in noise reduction, not > true sound proofing.  Low frequencies (bass, kick drum, even the lower couple of > octaves on guitars) are especially tough to "soundproof." > Where’s the room at in the house?  You want to soundproof relative to outdoors, > or the rest of your home?  Are you prepared to do double walls, ceilings, doors, > maybe even floor?  That’s what it would take.

  The room is in the back of my house, bottom floor.  It’s 20 foot long by 13 feet wide, big enough for a drum set a bass and guitar.   I don’t have any neighbors behind or to the West of my house, the neighbors next door are a couple of kids who live with their near-deaf grandmother.  The sound dampening is mostly for respect for my wife, who has been really awesome with my hobby.   Oh, did I mention, my daughter wants to play drums 8^).  If you can’t find a drummer spawn one, but that’s another chapter.   I added a couple of throw rugs and it helped the echo noise.   Two walls are brick, the other two are built up with thick glass windows.  I’m thinking about adding foamboard to the brick walls and covering with sheetrock.   winnard

Response:

Don’t forget that some urethane foam is flammable…..ala Great White. David

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->>>  I’m going to try to soundproof my guitar room somehow,  anyone have > any >>>experience doing this?   I know that foam stuff is way$$$. >>**  Do you want sound treatment for the room or sound PROOFING ?? > Sound >>proofing stops the noise getting out and disturbing others.  Sound > treatment >>makes the room less reverberant or "live". >>     Sound proofing a room  is a major undertaking –  the walls, doors, >>windows, ceilings etc all let sound through if not very heavy, solid and >>airtight. >It can be very expensive, and it almost always results in noise reduction, > not >true sound proofing.  Low frequencies (bass, kick drum, even the lower > couple of >octaves on guitars) are especially tough to "soundproof." >Where’s the room at in the house?  You want to soundproof relative to > outdoors, >or the rest of your home?  Are you prepared to do double walls, ceilings, > doors, >maybe even floor?  That’s what it would take. >   The room is in the back of my house, bottom floor.  It’s 20 foot long by > 13 feet wide, big enough for a drum set a bass and guitar.   I don’t have > any neighbors behind or to the West of my house, the neighbors next door are > a couple of kids who live with their near-deaf grandmother.  The sound > dampening is mostly for respect for my wife, who has been really awesome > with my hobby. >   Oh, did I mention, my daughter wants to play drums 8^).  If you can’t find > a drummer spawn one, but that’s another chapter. >   I added a couple of throw rugs and it helped the echo noise.   Two walls > are brick, the other two are built up with thick glass windows.  I’m > thinking about adding foamboard to the brick walls and covering with > sheetrock. >   winnard

Then (assuming it is a finished room) I’d plan on tacking up something on the wall that adjoins the rest of the house… like 6" foam, covered by moving blankets…brute force method. Angle if you like…look up plans for a studio if you want to cut standing waves. Make sure the insulation *above* the room is substantial enough, because it will transmit and maybe resonate if it isn’t. Having regular furniture like a sofa or two will help with standing waves and feedback. If you want to get fancy, you could look up some plans for some tubular bass traps…never done it, but the concept seems simple enough to a hacker.

Response:

> Don’t forget that some urethane foam is flammable…..ala Great White. > David

Can you spray that stuff with Borax to make it less so?

Response:

>> Stay away from that gorgeous sonix stuff.  It’s great but probably best > left for the DE part of a LEDE recording studio control room. >I always thought that cool foam was to (to some degree) break up >standing waves (there are cheaper ways to do this) and generally >deaden a small area for recording….not for soundproofing, per se.

They really aren’t that good for absorbing below 400Hz.  Though deadening material such as Sonex isn’t a replacement for an air-tight seal with some mass behind it. Ahh, I see what you mean now..  Yes, foam (Sonex) lowers that echo within the room, but is not a sound sealer of a room. >*Design* is important for soundproofing…a lot can be done with >a little design, some insulation, and some drywall and carpet. >Particularly if you have the freedom to finish an unfinished >basement to be ’soundproof’ above all other concerns.

Does he own the house/building his practice room is in?  How permanent does he want this? Does he want to keep the sound in the room or lower the echo of the room? A sealed room can be live and a dead room itself doesn’t make it sealed but probably helps a lot. Also, once the top-end frequencies are squelched from leaving the room, that just leaves the lo-end which should help dramatically, as what others will hear on the outside won’t be intelligible to them — just sounds woofy. I used to work in an office that the other side of one wall was a movie theater.  I could hear a little bit of music from it sometimes, but couldn’t understand or make it out and it never bothered me at all.  Yeah, some bass leaked, but it wasn’t a bother. — [species: human; planet: earth,milkyway(western spiral arm),alpha sector]

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> > >   I’m going to try to soundproof my guitar room somehow,  anyone have > any > > > experience doing this?   I know that foam stuff is way$$$. > > **  Do you want sound treatment for the room or sound PROOFING ?? > Sound > > proofing stops the noise getting out and disturbing others.  Sound > treatment > > makes the room less reverberant or "live". > >      Sound proofing a room  is a major undertaking –  the walls, doors, > > windows, ceilings etc all let sound through if not very heavy, solid and > > airtight. > It can be very expensive, and it almost always results in noise reduction, > not > true sound proofing.  Low frequencies (bass, kick drum, even the lower > couple of > octaves on guitars) are especially tough to "soundproof." > Where’s the room at in the house?  You want to soundproof relative to > outdoors, > or the rest of your home?  Are you prepared to do double walls, ceilings, > doors, > maybe even floor?  That’s what it would take. >   The room is in the back of my house, bottom floor.  It’s 20 foot long by > 13 feet wide, big enough for a drum set a bass and guitar.   I don’t have > any neighbors behind or to the West of my house, the neighbors next door are > a couple of kids who live with their near-deaf grandmother.  The sound > dampening is mostly for respect for my wife, who has been really awesome > with my hobby.

A set of ear plugs are WAY easier and cheaper.  ;-)

Response:

> A set of ear plugs are WAY easier and cheaper.  ;-)

  **  Has no effect of low frequency sounds  - often the most annoying ones for neighbours.

Response:

>  The room is in the back of my house, bottom floor.  It’s 20 foot long by >13 feet wide, big enough for a drum set a bass and guitar.   I don’t have >any neighbors behind or to the West of my house, the neighbors next door are >a couple of kids who live with their near-deaf grandmother.  The sound >dampening is mostly for respect for my wife, who has been really awesome >with my hobby.

Seal the door with weather stripping beads.  Add a whipper seal at the bottom.  Maybe replace the door with a solid one (security door) if it’s the normal hollow type.  Think air-tight. Sound can travel through the ceiling and floor, too, so add insulation under it from the basement.  Insulating the ceiling might be hard.. depends what’s above it. Are the walls joining the rest of the house solid brick or are those the outside walls?  You could do a build-out wall.  IOW, throw up a new wall frame a couple inches out to make a floated wall.  Fill the inside before framing with insulation and sheetrock it with a couple layers of the thick stuff to give it mass. — [species: human; planet: earth,milkyway(western spiral arm),alpha sector]

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->>>>  I’m going to try to soundproof my guitar room somehow,  anyone have >any >>>>experience doing this?   I know that foam stuff is way$$$. >>>**  Do you want sound treatment for the room or sound PROOFING ?? >Sound >>>proofing stops the noise getting out and disturbing others.  Sound >treatment >>>makes the room less reverberant or "live". >>>     Sound proofing a room  is a major undertaking –  the walls, doors, >>>windows, ceilings etc all let sound through if not very heavy, solid and >>>airtight. >>It can be very expensive, and it almost always results in noise reduction, >not >>true sound proofing.  Low frequencies (bass, kick drum, even the lower >couple of >>octaves on guitars) are especially tough to "soundproof." >>Where’s the room at in the house?  You want to soundproof relative to >outdoors, >>or the rest of your home?  Are you prepared to do double walls, ceilings, >doors, >>maybe even floor?  That’s what it would take. >  The room is in the back of my house, bottom floor.  It’s 20 foot long by >13 feet wide, big enough for a drum set a bass and guitar.   I don’t have >any neighbors behind or to the West of my house, the neighbors next door are >a couple of kids who live with their near-deaf grandmother.  The sound >dampening is mostly for respect for my wife, who has been really awesome >with my hobby. > A set of ear plugs are WAY easier and cheaper.  ;-)

Hey, keep in mind…she’s watching TV and talking on the phone! *That* gets complicated and expensive.

Response:

>> Don’t forget that some urethane foam is flammable…..ala Great White. > David >Can you spray that stuff with Borax to make it less so?

If you spray it with fireworks, eventually the flammability goes away. Pete — Well, I guess reality is what you make of it. –Bender

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->>Don’t forget that some urethane foam is flammable…..ala Great White. >>David >Can you spray that stuff with Borax to make it less so? > If you spray it with fireworks, eventually the flammability goes away. > Pete > — > Well, I guess reality is what you make of it. –Bender

Hi, How about WD-40? Tony

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> > >   I’m going to try to soundproof my guitar room somehow,  anyone have > any > > > experience doing this?   I know that foam stuff is way$$$. > > **  Do you want sound treatment for the room or sound PROOFING ?? > Sound > > proofing stops the noise getting out and disturbing others.  Sound > treatment > > makes the room less reverberant or "live". > >      Sound proofing a room  is a major undertaking –  the walls, doors, > > windows, ceilings etc all let sound through if not very heavy, solid and > > airtight. > It can be very expensive, and it almost always results in noise reduction, > not > true sound proofing.  Low frequencies (bass, kick drum, even the lower > couple of > octaves on guitars) are especially tough to "soundproof." > Where’s the room at in the house?  You want to soundproof relative to > outdoors, > or the rest of your home?  Are you prepared to do double walls, ceilings, > doors, > maybe even floor?  That’s what it would take. >   The room is in the back of my house, bottom floor.  It’s 20 foot long by > 13 feet wide, big enough for a drum set a bass and guitar.   I don’t have > any neighbors behind or to the West of my house, the neighbors next door are > a couple of kids who live with their near-deaf grandmother.  The sound > dampening is mostly for respect for my wife, who has been really awesome > with my hobby. >   Oh, did I mention, my daughter wants to play drums 8^).  If you can’t find > a drummer spawn one, but that’s another chapter. >   I added a couple of throw rugs and it helped the echo noise.   Two walls > are brick, the other two are built up with thick glass windows.  I’m > thinking about adding foamboard to the brick walls and covering with > sheetrock. >   winnard

        Hi "winnard",       Might I suggest,…..Go and talk to a "audiologist" or two, they go to a big expense getting a "booth" for their patient to sit in (wearing headphones mind you) that is isolated for *outside* noise in order to accurately test their hearing. Nowadays, these booths are somewhat prefab in nature. Older professionals in the business might remember the "old days" where they had to build something themselves to get a suitable environment.       With that said…..A drummer I regularly play with, that has some money to burn, had his home built with the intent to have a "soundproof" music room in the basement. All three floors of the house are concrete with 10′ ceiling height in the basement to accommodate 2 feet of treatment area to isolate sound wanting to radiate upwards (lots of stuff has been tried in the ceiling area). A floating floor was constructed to help with sound bouncing off the slab and radiating up/out. The walls to the room are 1 foot thick hollow with panels of foam suspended within the walls and not touching the outer walls. A lot of effort has gone into isolating this area.              When all is said and done, out side the house is pretty darn quiet, the basement is completely underground and when standing outside near the room, all you hear is the lowest of lows (mainly the siding vibrating a little) "Mama" can be upstairs and watch her TV with only having to add a little volume in order to hear. However, the room is nowhere near "soundproof". Methinks that attempting to really be very effective to eliminate sound in a existing residence would be a major undertaking to say the least. "Shaving" off the extreme highs and lows might be doable, but in the end, concessions between the players and the non-players would likely still have to be addressed.                                Cheers,                                      robert

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->>> Don’t forget that some urethane foam is flammable…..ala Great White. >>> David >> Can you spray that stuff with Borax to make it less so? > If you spray it with fireworks, eventually the flammability goes away. > Pete > — > Well, I guess reality is what you make of it. –Bender > Hi, > How about WD-40? > Tony

LOL Lloyd

Response:

(stuff snipped) > The room is in the back of my house, bottom floor.  It’s 20 foot long by > 13 feet wide, big enough for a drum set a bass and guitar.   I don’t have > any neighbors behind or to the West of my house, the neighbors next door are > a couple of kids who live with their near-deaf grandmother.  The sound > dampening is mostly for respect for my wife, who has been really awesome > with my hobby. > Oh, did I mention, my daughter wants to play drums 8^).  If you can’t find > a drummer spawn one, but that’s another chapter. > I added a couple of throw rugs and it helped the echo noise.   Two walls > are brick, the other two are built up with thick glass windows.  I’m > thinking about adding foamboard to the brick walls and covering with > sheetrock. > winnard

Here’s a "wild and crazy idea" that just might do the trick! 1] Get a PA system nothing too big will do. 2] Mike your amp and the drums completely. 3] Locate speakers/ monitors inside the music room. 4] Locate other monitors outside the room in the house but facing the music room. 5] Have the phase of the signal to the "outside" reversed. 6] Adjust the volume (and position) of "outside" speakers till the phase cancellation is maximized inside the house! ;) Lloyd

Response:

find a friendly HVAC contractor and ask if you can have the scraps of his 1" 6Lb density RFB (Rigid Fiberglass board). He’ll probably sell you full thing that will suck up bass adaquately. If you can get enough to cover 2 walls completely at a depth of 6 – 8" you’ll be way ahead of the game compared to the foam which really doesn’t do shit below 2.5Khz. You’ll need to face it with some acoustically transparent material like burlap and, Oh yeah, you’ll have to peel off the foil layer… epp

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->   I’m going to try to soundproof my guitar room somehow,  anyone have any > experience doing this?   I know that foam stuff is way$$$. >   winnard

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – > (stuff snipped) > The room is in the back of my house, bottom floor.  It’s 20 foot long by > 13 feet wide, big enough for a drum set a bass and guitar.   I don’t have > any neighbors behind or to the West of my house, the neighbors next door are > a couple of kids who live with their near-deaf grandmother.  The sound > dampening is mostly for respect for my wife, who has been really awesome > with my hobby. > Oh, did I mention, my daughter wants to play drums 8^).  If you can’t find > a drummer spawn one, but that’s another chapter. > I added a couple of throw rugs and it helped the echo noise.   Two walls > are brick, the other two are built up with thick glass windows.  I’m > thinking about adding foamboard to the brick walls and covering with > sheetrock. > winnard > Here’s a "wild and crazy idea" that just might do the trick! > 1] Get a PA system nothing too big will do. > 2] Mike your amp and the drums completely. > 3] Locate speakers/ monitors inside the music room. > 4] Locate other monitors outside the room in the house but facing the music > room. > 5] Have the phase of the signal to the "outside" reversed. > 6] Adjust the volume (and position) of "outside" speakers till the phase > cancellation is maximized inside the house! > ;) > Lloyd

WOW…..Thats thinking outside the box! ERic

Response:

>> Don’t forget that some urethane foam is flammable…..ala Great White. >> David >Can you spray that stuff with Borax to make it less so? > If you spray it with fireworks, eventually the flammability goes away. > Pete

YES!!! (In the voice of Ed McMann)

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> (stuff snipped) >> The room is in the back of my house, bottom floor.  It’s 20 foot long by >> 13 feet wide, big enough for a drum set a bass and guitar.   I don’t > have >> any neighbors behind or to the West of my house, the neighbors next door > are >> a couple of kids who live with their near-deaf grandmother.  The sound >> dampening is mostly for respect for my wife, who has been really awesome >> with my hobby. >> Oh, did I mention, my daughter wants to play drums 8^).  If you can’t > find >> a drummer spawn one, but that’s another chapter. >> I added a couple of throw rugs and it helped the echo noise.   Two walls >> are brick, the other two are built up with thick glass windows.  I’m >> thinking about adding foamboard to the brick walls and covering with >> sheetrock. >> winnard > Here’s a "wild and crazy idea" that just might do the trick! > 1] Get a PA system nothing too big will do. > 2] Mike your amp and the drums completely. > 3] Locate speakers/ monitors inside the music room. > 4] Locate other monitors outside the room in the house but facing the > music > room. > 5] Have the phase of the signal to the "outside" reversed. > 6] Adjust the volume (and position) of "outside" speakers till the phase > cancellation is maximized inside the house! > ;) > Lloyd > WOW…..Thats thinking outside the box! > ERic

…Yeah and there wasn’t any drugs involved! :) Lloyd

Response:

>*sigh* Yet more evidence of humour impairment – you haven’t been >wearing your tinfoil hat have you?

Sorry, I don’t come from a culture where stupid == funny.   —             "Anyone who willingly engages in a battle of wits           with a fish is at best evenly matched." — Pete Young

Response:

Actually , go to high end stereo place. I don’t have a current catalog. But you can buy (foam padding ??) type devices to absorb the sound. Go to high end audio newsgroup for better suggestions.

Response:

Soundproofing a room or space is a bit like emptying the ocean with a spoon;  it can be done but only with great effort. You can do a little with a little time and money but it you want to make a major difference it will take tons of time and money. Motley Crew used to rehearse in our studio and we learned that stopping sound transmission is a hugh job. Good luck Richard – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – > Actually , go to high end stereo place. I don’t have a current catalog. > But you can buy (foam padding ??) type devices to absorb the sound. Go > to high end audio newsgroup for better suggestions.

Response:

I just saw dream homes on hgtv. Checkout owening corning web page.

Response:

I thought this was an important enough point to be worth highlighting. Too many people pack fiberglass into the empty space between studs and joists.  Only to have the sound go around all that fiberglass and travel from one side to the other through the studs or joists themselves. Yes, without drywall, all the exposed fiberglass will seem to absorb the sound.  However, that all changes when the drywall is installed.  In a wall, the sound will vibrate the drywall, which in turn will vibrate the studs, which in turn will vibrate the drywall on the other side.  Thus, the sound makes it through. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – > What you are doing is creating a large mass that absorbes > sound waves and then dissipates the sound through the resilient furring > strips instead of tranmitting it through the studs or joists.

Response:

> Yes, without drywall, all the exposed fiberglass will seem to > absorb the sound.  However, that all changes when the drywall > is installed.  In a wall, the sound will vibrate the drywall, > which in turn will vibrate the studs, which in turn will vibrate > the drywall on the other side.  Thus, the sound makes it through.

Hence the importance of using resilient furring strips as I pointed out – they isolate the drywall from the studs or joists (to a large degree) and allow the drywall to absorb the sound energy and then to dissipate it through movement of the drywall with little transmission to the studs or joists. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> What you are doing is creating a large mass that absorbes > sound waves and then dissipates the sound through the resilient furring > strips instead of tranmitting it through the studs or joists.

Response:

this is going to sound crazy….but i recently installed wilsonart laminate flooring with their top-o-d-line soundproofing flooring. that floor is *dead* silent.  you could drop a bowling ball on it and barely hear it. now, my bass module, which used to rattle the pictures on my walls, causes no vibrations at all. don’t know if anyone can say anything about that, or even if i’m nuts. > Any suggestions on a cost effective way to soundproof a room > reasonably well?  Not recording studio quality, but simply a > sound resistant room so that I can play drums without the > volume being carried around the house. > This room would be built in an unfinished basement. > Any info would be helpful! > Email me if you like. > Bryan

Response:

>this is going to sound crazy….but i recently installed wilsonart >laminate flooring with their top-o-d-line soundproofing flooring. >that floor is *dead* silent.  you could drop a bowling ball on it and >barely hear it.

Mass.  Separation.  Prevention of infiltration (direct air paths). Take care of all factors and you will have good soundproofing.  As others have pointed out, folks tend to do one and not the others, so don’t get a good result. By all means weatherstrip, caulk, seal. Mass is the hardest for most folks, because it is heavy.  People want to go with easy light weight foam products but really some mass is needed especially for bass.  Double drywall is well recognized, but without the resilient suspension or some alternate means of separation it will not be effective because it will just transmit right through the solids, like hammering on a pipe in the attic and having it ring in the basement.. We have some sound reducing surfaces where a softer sound deadening board was used behind the gypsum board, thus giving both mass and separation.  We also have double framed walls in these areas so as to avoid through transmission via the studs.  And pipe and electrical passages were carefully stuffed and foamed so as to avoid air paths. Seems to be helpful but then have not done a controlled study! -v.

Response:

Get electronic drums. You say you don’t want recording studio quality, but drums are certainly major league LOUD. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->this is going to sound crazy….but i recently installed wilsonart >laminate flooring with their top-o-d-line soundproofing flooring. >that floor is *dead* silent.  you could drop a bowling ball on it and >barely hear it. > Mass.  Separation.  Prevention of infiltration (direct air paths). > Take care of all factors and you will have good soundproofing.  As > others have pointed out, folks tend to do one and not the others, so > don’t get a good result. > By all means weatherstrip, caulk, seal. > Mass is the hardest for most folks, because it is heavy.  People want > to go with easy light weight foam products but really some mass is > needed especially for bass.  Double drywall is well recognized, but > without the resilient suspension or some alternate means of separation > it will not be effective because it will just transmit right through > the solids, like hammering on a pipe in the attic and having it ring > in the basement.. > We have some sound reducing surfaces where a softer sound deadening > board was used behind the gypsum board, thus giving both mass and > separation.  We also have double framed walls in these areas so as to > avoid through transmission via the studs.  And pipe and electrical > passages were carefully stuffed and foamed so as to avoid air paths. > Seems to be helpful but then have not done a controlled study! > -v

Response:

This of course depends on the frequency of the sound. I agree that in this case (drums) mass is what counts. But for voice and higher frequencies, insulation is effective. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> I thought this was an important enough point to be worth > highlighting. > Too many people pack fiberglass into the empty space between > studs and joists.  Only to have the sound go around all that > fiberglass and travel from one side to the other through the > studs or joists themselves. > Yes, without drywall, all the exposed fiberglass will seem to > absorb the sound.  However, that all changes when the drywall > is installed.  In a wall, the sound will vibrate the drywall, > which in turn will vibrate the studs, which in turn will vibrate > the drywall on the other side.  Thus, the sound makes it through.

Response:

>{Some psychotherapists use lead sheeting (comes in rolls) in the walls >{to deaden sound.  It works surprisingly well and is a nobrainer to >{install when the walls are open.  – km >That’s hilarious! Doesn’t lead cause some kinda brain damage? Those >psychotherapists know how to keep themselves in business eh? I wonder >what would happen 20 years down the road when You list the house and >the inspector reports the presence of sheets of lead in the walls?

*sigh* Yet another proof that exposure to a small amount of knowledge may be more damaging than total ignorance. Lead only causes brain damage if you ingest it or breath it in dust form (the double-whammy is lead face powder, because it will apparently slowly eat away at your skin, but that hasn’t been in style for nearly two hundred years), neither of which is likely to happen if it’s encased in your walls. —         "I think that everyone should have a crazy friend, just to           keep one’s own problems in perspective." –Pat Steppic

Response:

Any suggestions on a cost effective way to soundproof a room reasonably well?  Not recording studio quality, but simply a sound resistant room so that I can play drums without the volume being carried around the house. This room would be built in an unfinished basement. Any info would be helpful! Email me if you like. Bryan

Response:

In misc.consumers.house >Any suggestions on a cost effective way to soundproof a room >reasonably well?  Not recording studio quality, but simply a >sound resistant room so that I can play drums without the >volume being carried around the house.

First, make it as air-tight as possible.  You will need to add weatherstripping to the door.  Second, buy a bunch of the egg crate mattress covers and line the walls and doors with it.

Response:

Drywall is effective but you must install it on resilient furring strips… basically a flexible galvanized metal strip you screw the panels to… they hold the drywall off of the studs or joists. Most places recommend a double layer of drywall but that seems a bit excessive for your purposes. What you are doing is creating a large mass that absorbes sound waves and then dissipates the sound through the resilient furring strips instead of tranmitting it through the studs or joists. Nailing up carpets and egg crates and all that might make a small difference in high frequency but I don’t think it’ll do a whole lotta good for drums… mass is what you want… drywall is the cheapest way to get it.. Another trick is to put small panels in your corners, floor to ceiling. I’ve seen plans where there’s a 4" gap in the middle of the corner panel and the hollow behind the gap is filled with fiberglass batt… called a bass trap. Then there’s Helmholtz Resonators… never made one but a friend did and it’s essentially two panels of masonite seperated by a 2×2" frame with a series of carefully spaced holes drilled in each panel. There’s some formula to determine spacing… these suckers are suspended near walls and by gawd do they ever suck up high frequency sound. Cheap and effective but you’ll need to do some research if you go that route. Otherwise, like another poster stated just try to make everything as airtight as possible. Caulking, strips of wood or weatherstripping wherever there’s a gap, spray in expanding foam insulation is excellent to seal up around outlets or other gaps. I’m pretty much in the middle of this type of deal myself. My "band" jammed in my basement for the past 6 months until I moved everything to another space while I fix up the basement – and let me tell you I am CHEAP. Trying to do it for next to nothing with no major reno project headaches. For drums the bass seems to be the biggest problem… moves a large percussion wave… I’ve found a 4′x4′ panel on feet, covered with open cell foam or some other absorbant type of insulating material and placed somewhere in front of the bass drum works really well. It intercepts the wave and dissipates it through flexing in its feet. Anyway… it’s all worth it if you get to beat on your drums whenever you want! John – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Any suggestions on a cost effective way to soundproof a room > reasonably well?  Not recording studio quality, but simply a > sound resistant room so that I can play drums without the > volume being carried around the house. > This room would be built in an unfinished basement. > Any info would be helpful! > Email me if you like. > Bryan

Response:

>*sigh* Yet more evidence of humour impairment – you haven’t been >wearing your tinfoil hat have you?

Sorry, I don’t come from a culture where stupid == funny.   —             "Anyone who willingly engages in a battle of wits           with a fish is at best evenly matched." — Pete Young

Response:

Actually , go to high end stereo place. I don’t have a current catalog. But you can buy (foam padding ??) type devices to absorb the sound. Go to high end audio newsgroup for better suggestions.

Response:

Soundproofing a room or space is a bit like emptying the ocean with a spoon;  it can be done but only with great effort. You can do a little with a little time and money but it you want to make a major difference it will take tons of time and money. Motley Crew used to rehearse in our studio and we learned that stopping sound transmission is a hugh job. Good luck Richard – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – > Actually , go to high end stereo place. I don’t have a current catalog. > But you can buy (foam padding ??) type devices to absorb the sound. Go > to high end audio newsgroup for better suggestions.

Response:

I just saw dream homes on hgtv. Checkout owening corning web page.

Response:

I thought this was an important enough point to be worth highlighting. Too many people pack fiberglass into the empty space between studs and joists.  Only to have the sound go around all that fiberglass and travel from one side to the other through the studs or joists themselves. Yes, without drywall, all the exposed fiberglass will seem to absorb the sound.  However, that all changes when the drywall is installed.  In a wall, the sound will vibrate the drywall, which in turn will vibrate the studs, which in turn will vibrate the drywall on the other side.  Thus, the sound makes it through. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – > What you are doing is creating a large mass that absorbes > sound waves and then dissipates the sound through the resilient furring > strips instead of tranmitting it through the studs or joists.

Response:

> Yes, without drywall, all the exposed fiberglass will seem to > absorb the sound.  However, that all changes when the drywall > is installed.  In a wall, the sound will vibrate the drywall, > which in turn will vibrate the studs, which in turn will vibrate > the drywall on the other side.  Thus, the sound makes it through.

Hence the importance of using resilient furring strips as I pointed out – they isolate the drywall from the studs or joists (to a large degree) and allow the drywall to absorb the sound energy and then to dissipate it through movement of the drywall with little transmission to the studs or joists. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> What you are doing is creating a large mass that absorbes > sound waves and then dissipates the sound through the resilient furring > strips instead of tranmitting it through the studs or joists.

Response:

this is going to sound crazy….but i recently installed wilsonart laminate flooring with their top-o-d-line soundproofing flooring. that floor is *dead* silent.  you could drop a bowling ball on it and barely hear it. now, my bass module, which used to rattle the pictures on my walls, causes no vibrations at all. don’t know if anyone can say anything about that, or even if i’m nuts. > Any suggestions on a cost effective way to soundproof a room > reasonably well?  Not recording studio quality, but simply a > sound resistant room so that I can play drums without the > volume being carried around the house. > This room would be built in an unfinished basement. > Any info would be helpful! > Email me if you like. > Bryan

Response:

>this is going to sound crazy….but i recently installed wilsonart >laminate flooring with their top-o-d-line soundproofing flooring. >that floor is *dead* silent.  you could drop a bowling ball on it and >barely hear it.

Mass.  Separation.  Prevention of infiltration (direct air paths). Take care of all factors and you will have good soundproofing.  As others have pointed out, folks tend to do one and not the others, so don’t get a good result. By all means weatherstrip, caulk, seal. Mass is the hardest for most folks, because it is heavy.  People want to go with easy light weight foam products but really some mass is needed especially for bass.  Double drywall is well recognized, but without the resilient suspension or some alternate means of separation it will not be effective because it will just transmit right through the solids, like hammering on a pipe in the attic and having it ring in the basement.. We have some sound reducing surfaces where a softer sound deadening board was used behind the gypsum board, thus giving both mass and separation.  We also have double framed walls in these areas so as to avoid through transmission via the studs.  And pipe and electrical passages were carefully stuffed and foamed so as to avoid air paths. Seems to be helpful but then have not done a controlled study! -v.

Response:

Get electronic drums. You say you don’t want recording studio quality, but drums are certainly major league LOUD. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->this is going to sound crazy….but i recently installed wilsonart >laminate flooring with their top-o-d-line soundproofing flooring. >that floor is *dead* silent.  you could drop a bowling ball on it and >barely hear it. > Mass.  Separation.  Prevention of infiltration (direct air paths). > Take care of all factors and you will have good soundproofing.  As > others have pointed out, folks tend to do one and not the others, so > don’t get a good result. > By all means weatherstrip, caulk, seal. > Mass is the hardest for most folks, because it is heavy.  People want > to go with easy light weight foam products but really some mass is > needed especially for bass.  Double drywall is well recognized, but > without the resilient suspension or some alternate means of separation > it will not be effective because it will just transmit right through > the solids, like hammering on a pipe in the attic and having it ring > in the basement.. > We have some sound reducing surfaces where a softer sound deadening > board was used behind the gypsum board, thus giving both mass and > separation.  We also have double framed walls in these areas so as to > avoid through transmission via the studs.  And pipe and electrical > passages were carefully stuffed and foamed so as to avoid air paths. > Seems to be helpful but then have not done a controlled study! > -v

Response:

This of course depends on the frequency of the sound. I agree that in this case (drums) mass is what counts. But for voice and higher frequencies, insulation is effective. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> I thought this was an important enough point to be worth > highlighting. > Too many people pack fiberglass into the empty space between > studs and joists.  Only to have the sound go around all that > fiberglass and travel from one side to the other through the > studs or joists themselves. > Yes, without drywall, all the exposed fiberglass will seem to > absorb the sound.  However, that all changes when the drywall > is installed.  In a wall, the sound will vibrate the drywall, > which in turn will vibrate the studs, which in turn will vibrate > the drywall on the other side.  Thus, the sound makes it through.

Response:

>{Some psychotherapists use lead sheeting (comes in rolls) in the walls >{to deaden sound.  It works surprisingly well and is a nobrainer to >{install when the walls are open.  – km >That’s hilarious! Doesn’t lead cause some kinda brain damage? Those >psychotherapists know how to keep themselves in business eh? I wonder >what would happen 20 years down the road when You list the house and >the inspector reports the presence of sheets of lead in the walls?

*sigh* Yet another proof that exposure to a small amount of knowledge may be more damaging than total ignorance. Lead only causes brain damage if you ingest it or breath it in dust form (the double-whammy is lead face powder, because it will apparently slowly eat away at your skin, but that hasn’t been in style for nearly two hundred years), neither of which is likely to happen if it’s encased in your walls. —         "I think that everyone should have a crazy friend, just to           keep one’s own problems in perspective." –Pat Steppic

Response:

Any suggestions on a cost effective way to soundproof a room reasonably well?  Not recording studio quality, but simply a sound resistant room so that I can play drums without the volume being carried around the house. This room would be built in an unfinished basement. Any info would be helpful! Email me if you like. Bryan

Response:

In misc.consumers.house >Any suggestions on a cost effective way to soundproof a room >reasonably well?  Not recording studio quality, but simply a >sound resistant room so that I can play drums without the >volume being carried around the house.

First, make it as air-tight as possible.  You will need to add weatherstripping to the door.  Second, buy a bunch of the egg crate mattress covers and line the walls and doors with it.

Response:

Drywall is effective but you must install it on resilient furring strips… basically a flexible galvanized metal strip you screw the panels to… they hold the drywall off of the studs or joists. Most places recommend a double layer of drywall but that seems a bit excessive for your purposes. What you are doing is creating a large mass that absorbes sound waves and then dissipates the sound through the resilient furring strips instead of tranmitting it through the studs or joists. Nailing up carpets and egg crates and all that might make a small difference in high frequency but I don’t think it’ll do a whole lotta good for drums… mass is what you want… drywall is the cheapest way to get it.. Another trick is to put small panels in your corners, floor to ceiling. I’ve seen plans where there’s a 4" gap in the middle of the corner panel and the hollow behind the gap is filled with fiberglass batt… called a bass trap. Then there’s Helmholtz Resonators… never made one but a friend did and it’s essentially two panels of masonite seperated by a 2×2" frame with a series of carefully spaced holes drilled in each panel. There’s some formula to determine spacing… these suckers are suspended near walls and by gawd do they ever suck up high frequency sound. Cheap and effective but you’ll need to do some research if you go that route. Otherwise, like another poster stated just try to make everything as airtight as possible. Caulking, strips of wood or weatherstripping wherever there’s a gap, spray in expanding foam insulation is excellent to seal up around outlets or other gaps. I’m pretty much in the middle of this type of deal myself. My "band" jammed in my basement for the past 6 months until I moved everything to another space while I fix up the basement – and let me tell you I am CHEAP. Trying to do it for next to nothing with no major reno project headaches. For drums the bass seems to be the biggest problem… moves a large percussion wave… I’ve found a 4′x4′ panel on feet, covered with open cell foam or some other absorbant type of insulating material and placed somewhere in front of the bass drum works really well. It intercepts the wave and dissipates it through flexing in its feet. Anyway… it’s all worth it if you get to beat on your drums whenever you want! John – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Any suggestions on a cost effective way to soundproof a room > reasonably well?  Not recording studio quality, but simply a > sound resistant room so that I can play drums without the > volume being carried around the house. > This room would be built in an unfinished basement. > Any info would be helpful! > Email me if you like. > Bryan

Response:

>*sigh* Yet more evidence of humour impairment – you haven’t been >wearing your tinfoil hat have you?

Sorry, I don’t come from a culture where stupid == funny.   —             "Anyone who willingly engages in a battle of wits           with a fish is at best evenly matched." — Pete Young

Response:

Actually , go to high end stereo place. I don’t have a current catalog. But you can buy (foam padding ??) type devices to absorb the sound. Go to high end audio newsgroup for better suggestions.

Response:

Soundproofing a room or space is a bit like emptying the ocean with a spoon;  it can be done but only with great effort. You can do a little with a little time and money but it you want to make a major difference it will take tons of time and money. Motley Crew used to rehearse in our studio and we learned that stopping sound transmission is a hugh job. Good luck Richard – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – > Actually , go to high end stereo place. I don’t have a current catalog. > But you can buy (foam padding ??) type devices to absorb the sound. Go > to high end audio newsgroup for better suggestions.

Response:

I just saw dream homes on hgtv. Checkout owening corning web page.

Response:

I thought this was an important enough point to be worth highlighting. Too many people pack fiberglass into the empty space between studs and joists.  Only to have the sound go around all that fiberglass and travel from one side to the other through the studs or joists themselves. Yes, without drywall, all the exposed fiberglass will seem to absorb the sound.  However, that all changes when the drywall is installed.  In a wall, the sound will vibrate the drywall, which in turn will vibrate the studs, which in turn will vibrate the drywall on the other side.  Thus, the sound makes it through. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – > What you are doing is creating a large mass that absorbes > sound waves and then dissipates the sound through the resilient furring > strips instead of tranmitting it through the studs or joists.

Response:

> Yes, without drywall, all the exposed fiberglass will seem to > absorb the sound.  However, that all changes when the drywall > is installed.  In a wall, the sound will vibrate the drywall, > which in turn will vibrate the studs, which in turn will vibrate > the drywall on the other side.  Thus, the sound makes it through.

Hence the importance of using resilient furring strips as I pointed out – they isolate the drywall from the studs or joists (to a large degree) and allow the drywall to absorb the sound energy and then to dissipate it through movement of the drywall with little transmission to the studs or joists. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> What you are doing is creating a large mass that absorbes > sound waves and then dissipates the sound through the resilient furring > strips instead of tranmitting it through the studs or joists.

Response:

this is going to sound crazy….but i recently installed wilsonart laminate flooring with their top-o-d-line soundproofing flooring. that floor is *dead* silent.  you could drop a bowling ball on it and barely hear it. now, my bass module, which used to rattle the pictures on my walls, causes no vibrations at all. don’t know if anyone can say anything about that, or even if i’m nuts. > Any suggestions on a cost effective way to soundproof a room > reasonably well?  Not recording studio quality, but simply a > sound resistant room so that I can play drums without the > volume being carried around the house. > This room would be built in an unfinished basement. > Any info would be helpful! > Email me if you like. > Bryan

Response:

>this is going to sound crazy….but i recently installed wilsonart >laminate flooring with their top-o-d-line soundproofing flooring. >that floor is *dead* silent.  you could drop a bowling ball on it and >barely hear it.

Mass.  Separation.  Prevention of infiltration (direct air paths). Take care of all factors and you will have good soundproofing.  As others have pointed out, folks tend to do one and not the others, so don’t get a good result. By all means weatherstrip, caulk, seal. Mass is the hardest for most folks, because it is heavy.  People want to go with easy light weight foam products but really some mass is needed especially for bass.  Double drywall is well recognized, but without the resilient suspension or some alternate means of separation it will not be effective because it will just transmit right through the solids, like hammering on a pipe in the attic and having it ring in the basement.. We have some sound reducing surfaces where a softer sound deadening board was used behind the gypsum board, thus giving both mass and separation.  We also have double framed walls in these areas so as to avoid through transmission via the studs.  And pipe and electrical passages were carefully stuffed and foamed so as to avoid air paths. Seems to be helpful but then have not done a controlled study! -v.

Response:

Get electronic drums. You say you don’t want recording studio quality, but drums are certainly major league LOUD. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->this is going to sound crazy….but i recently installed wilsonart >laminate flooring with their top-o-d-line soundproofing flooring. >that floor is *dead* silent.  you could drop a bowling ball on it and >barely hear it. > Mass.  Separation.  Prevention of infiltration (direct air paths). > Take care of all factors and you will have good soundproofing.  As > others have pointed out, folks tend to do one and not the others, so > don’t get a good result. > By all means weatherstrip, caulk, seal. > Mass is the hardest for most folks, because it is heavy.  People want > to go with easy light weight foam products but really some mass is > needed especially for bass.  Double drywall is well recognized, but > without the resilient suspension or some alternate means of separation > it will not be effective because it will just transmit right through > the solids, like hammering on a pipe in the attic and having it ring > in the basement.. > We have some sound reducing surfaces where a softer sound deadening > board was used behind the gypsum board, thus giving both mass and > separation.  We also have double framed walls in these areas so as to > avoid through transmission via the studs.  And pipe and electrical > passages were carefully stuffed and foamed so as to avoid air paths. > Seems to be helpful but then have not done a controlled study! > -v

Response:

This of course depends on the frequency of the sound. I agree that in this case (drums) mass is what counts. But for voice and higher frequencies, insulation is effective. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> I thought this was an important enough point to be worth > highlighting. > Too many people pack fiberglass into the empty space between > studs and joists.  Only to have the sound go around all that > fiberglass and travel from one side to the other through the > studs or joists themselves. > Yes, without drywall, all the exposed fiberglass will seem to > absorb the sound.  However, that all changes when the drywall > is installed.  In a wall, the sound will vibrate the drywall, > which in turn will vibrate the studs, which in turn will vibrate > the drywall on the other side.  Thus, the sound makes it through.

Response:

>{Some psychotherapists use lead sheeting (comes in rolls) in the walls >{to deaden sound.  It works surprisingly well and is a nobrainer to >{install when the walls are open.  – km >That’s hilarious! Doesn’t lead cause some kinda brain damage? Those >psychotherapists know how to keep themselves in business eh? I wonder >what would happen 20 years down the road when You list the house and >the inspector reports the presence of sheets of lead in the walls?

*sigh* Yet another proof that exposure to a small amount of knowledge may be more damaging than total ignorance. Lead only causes brain damage if you ingest it or breath it in dust form (the double-whammy is lead face powder, because it will apparently slowly eat away at your skin, but that hasn’t been in style for nearly two hundred years), neither of which is likely to happen if it’s encased in your walls. —         "I think that everyone should have a crazy friend, just to           keep one’s own problems in perspective." –Pat Steppic

Response:

Any suggestions on a cost effective way to soundproof a room reasonably well?  Not recording studio quality, but simply a sound resistant room so that I can play drums without the volume being carried around the house. This room would be built in an unfinished basement. Any info would be helpful! Email me if you like. Bryan

Response:

In misc.consumers.house >Any suggestions on a cost effective way to soundproof a room >reasonably well?  Not recording studio quality, but simply a >sound resistant room so that I can play drums without the >volume being carried around the house.

First, make it as air-tight as possible.  You will need to add weatherstripping to the door.  Second, buy a bunch of the egg crate mattress covers and line the walls and doors with it.

Response:

Drywall is effective but you must install it on resilient furring strips… basically a flexible galvanized metal strip you screw the panels to… they hold the drywall off of the studs or joists. Most places recommend a double layer of drywall but that seems a bit excessive for your purposes. What you are doing is creating a large mass that absorbes sound waves and then dissipates the sound through the resilient furring strips instead of tranmitting it through the studs or joists. Nailing up carpets and egg crates and all that might make a small difference in high frequency but I don’t think it’ll do a whole lotta good for drums… mass is what you want… drywall is the cheapest way to get it.. Another trick is to put small panels in your corners, floor to ceiling. I’ve seen plans where there’s a 4" gap in the middle of the corner panel and the hollow behind the gap is filled with fiberglass batt… called a bass trap. Then there’s Helmholtz Resonators… never made one but a friend did and it’s essentially two panels of masonite seperated by a 2×2" frame with a series of carefully spaced holes drilled in each panel. There’s some formula to determine spacing… these suckers are suspended near walls and by gawd do they ever suck up high frequency sound. Cheap and effective but you’ll need to do some research if you go that route. Otherwise, like another poster stated just try to make everything as airtight as possible. Caulking, strips of wood or weatherstripping wherever there’s a gap, spray in expanding foam insulation is excellent to seal up around outlets or other gaps. I’m pretty much in the middle of this type of deal myself. My "band" jammed in my basement for the past 6 months until I moved everything to another space while I fix up the basement – and let me tell you I am CHEAP. Trying to do it for next to nothing with no major reno project headaches. For drums the bass seems to be the biggest problem… moves a large percussion wave… I’ve found a 4′x4′ panel on feet, covered with open cell foam or some other absorbant type of insulating material and placed somewhere in front of the bass drum works really well. It intercepts the wave and dissipates it through flexing in its feet. Anyway… it’s all worth it if you get to beat on your drums whenever you want! John – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Any suggestions on a cost effective way to soundproof a room > reasonably well?  Not recording studio quality, but simply a > sound resistant room so that I can play drums without the > volume being carried around the house. > This room would be built in an unfinished basement. > Any info would be helpful! > Email me if you like. > Bryan

Response:

Question:

I need HELP! Is wood Laminate flooring as good as they say it is?  How indestructable, how water resistant?  Is one brand beter than the other?  Laminate vs. ceramic tile? Does Ceramic crack as house setels?  Is the grout a dirt trap? I have no experience and want to make the best choice. Please share your experiences, good and bad with me. Thanks, Cathy

Response:

Laminate (e.g. pergo) works fine, but looks absolutely phoney (in my opinion). Easy to install though. In tile, light colored grout may discolor through stains or time, like anything light colored. If you like tile but are afraid of that, use dark grout. Ceramic tile may crack as the house settles, just like anything rigid, but if your house settles enough in a reasonable period of time to crack your tiles (e.g. 20 years or so), then they were improperly installed or you have much more serious issues. Your choice should be guided by your preference. Any choice of material will provide you with a floor that is functional. Is easy cleaning important? Go with linoleum or laminate. Are looks and durability important? Go with wood or tile. Do you have kids who are likely to drop a lot of dishes on the floor? Maybe tile’s not such a good idea any more, since glass or ceramic that falls on it will surely break. How important is cost? Linoleum or laminate materials are probably a lot cheaper than wood or tile. Everything has pros and cons and your choice should depend on your budget, how long you plan to live in the house, what your aesthetic preferences are. Personally, I love tiles in the kitchen. But that’s just me.

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> I need HELP! Is wood Laminate flooring as good as they say it is?  How > indestructable, how water resistant?  Is one brand beter than the > other?  Laminate vs. ceramic tile? Does Ceramic crack as house setels? >  Is the grout a dirt trap? I have no experience and want to make the > best choice. Please share your experiences, good and bad with me. > Thanks, > Cathy

Response:

Question:

I"m going from memory but it seems to me that it was about $220 Canadian for a roll that was 5" X 65". So that would be about $1.50 per square foot Cdn, which means about $1.US. There are similar but more expensive products available here at Home Depot that come in 2′X2′ squares with the tongue and groove OSB already attached. This doesnt take into account the cost of the OSB or the TAP CON screws but presumably you would be using the OSB with the traditional system and some TAP CONs. I would not have installed laminate flooring in a basement if this product had not been available.

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> They should have put one of those new Lego-like plastic subfloors down > before the plywood. They are much thinner than a traditional subfloor, > don’t > take much as much space , the are made of an inert material, they allow > air > to circulate underneath, the air layer insulates the floor from the > concrete. See: http://www.deltams.com/deltafl/ > I don’t have any stake in the company or anything. I used in in my > basement > and put down laminate. Great product. > Looks like a great product,  what was the cost? > Gloria > — > Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. > Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).

Response:

> They should have put one of those new Lego-like plastic subfloors down > before the plywood. They are much thinner than a traditional subfloor, > don’t take much as much space , the are made of an inert material, > they allow air to circulate underneath, the air layer insulates the > floor from the concrete. See: http://www.deltams.com/deltafl/

If the air layer insulates the floor form the concrete, does it mean this product would NOT be good for a basement where I have in-floor heating?  (I.e., would it actually prevent some of the floor heat from coming up as desired?) I also have drain tile and a sump pump (that is still going in late October!), so does that mean I also don’t have to be concerned with the moisture-blocking aspects of this product? How have others put floor covering on in-floor heated basements? Thanks,   – Tom A. ;-) I’d rather be ____  Thomas R. Arneberg  | Only 581 more days :-) Barbershop  _|   _| SGI/SN2 ASIC Design | (June 1-July 16, 2004) :-) Quartet!   (_)  (_) Chippewa Falls, WI  | http://arneberg.com

Response:

> They should have put one of those new Lego-like plastic subfloors down > before the plywood. They are much thinner than a traditional subfloor, don’t > take much as much space , the are made of an inert material, they allow air > to circulate underneath, the air layer insulates the floor from the > concrete. See: http://www.deltams.com/deltafl/ > I don’t have any stake in the company or anything. I used in in my basement > and put down laminate. Great product.

Looks like a great product,  what was the cost? Gloria — Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).

Response:

Unless you had specified in detail the construction of the subfloor you won’t have much luck in getting the builder to change anything.    You are in a seller’s market right now and the builders will just ignore any ranting and raving you may inflict on them (or their service organization). Subfloors are usually put in basements for a couple of reasons – the first is the misconception that it will make the floor ‘warmer’.   The reason a basement floor feels cold is not because of the concrete floor – it is because cold air sinks and if you don’t circulate the basement air properly (esp. in the winter) you will get cold feet.  This is assuming there is a covering on the floor such as tile or carpeting. Subfloors are also useful to deaden sound – if you put in a home theatre in your basement you’ll get a richer sound if there is a less dense floor (ie a wooden subfloor). If you paid to have a subfloor put in because you wanted to make  the basement feel warmer AND the builder just nailed the plywood to the concrete (with the appropriate vapour barrier – as per code) AND the builder won’t do anything to change it – try negotiating a cold air return in the basement as well as heat registers ALL AT FLOOR LEVEL as a compromise.   These will do more to keep the basement warm than a subfloor with R20 :^) Good luck David Markham,  ON – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – > I am buying a new home from a builder in Toronto, Canada. > In my purchase agreement it is specified that the basement floor is to > be finished with a subfloor. They are putting carpeting on top of that. > However, they forgot to account for the height of the subfloor when > building the basement stairs. First, they told me that the bottom step > in the stairs would have to be short to compensate, but we told them we > would not accept that, as it would be easy to trip on it. Later I found > out that this is against the local building code! > Instead, what they did (without consulting with us) is to put the > plywood subfloor directly on the concrete, with a plastic film in the > middle (moisture barrier?), with no sleepers. The plywood seems to be > somehow nailed or screwed on the concrete. > This is clearly not what we are paying for, and I will loudly complain > to them, but what I am wondering is if this is a good enough solution > and I should just try to get some money back from them, or whether I > should insist on PT sleepers under the plywood (and having the staircase > replaced). Why are sleepers normally used under the subfloor anyway? > What kind of problems can I expect long term with this setup? > If I were to try to get some money back, what amount would be > reasonable? What is a ballpark cost of putting those sleepers under the > subfloor? The finished area in the basement is about 2000 sq ft. > Thanks for any advice…

Response:

They should have put one of those new Lego-like plastic subfloors down before the plywood. They are much thinner than a traditional subfloor, don’t take much as much space , the are made of an inert material, they allow air to circulate underneath, the air layer insulates the floor from the concrete. See: http://www.deltams.com/deltafl/ I don’t have any stake in the company or anything. I used in in my basement and put down laminate. Great product.

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> I am buying a new home from a builder in Toronto, Canada. > In my purchase agreement it is specified that the basement floor is to > be finished with a subfloor. They are putting carpeting on top of that. > However, they forgot to account for the height of the subfloor when > building the basement stairs. First, they told me that the bottom step > in the stairs would have to be short to compensate, but we told them we > would not accept that, as it would be easy to trip on it. Later I found > out that this is against the local building code! > Instead, what they did (without consulting with us) is to put the > plywood subfloor directly on the concrete, with a plastic film in the > middle (moisture barrier?), with no sleepers. The plywood seems to be > somehow nailed or screwed on the concrete. > This is clearly not what we are paying for, and I will loudly complain > to them, but what I am wondering is if this is a good enough solution > and I should just try to get some money back from them, or whether I > should insist on PT sleepers under the plywood (and having the staircase > replaced). Why are sleepers normally used under the subfloor anyway? > What kind of problems can I expect long term with this setup? > If I were to try to get some money back, what amount would be > reasonable? What is a ballpark cost of putting those sleepers under the > subfloor? The finished area in the basement is about 2000 sq ft. > Thanks for any advice…

Response:

I am buying a new home from a builder in Toronto, Canada. In my purchase agreement it is specified that the basement floor is to be finished with a subfloor. They are putting carpeting on top of that. However, they forgot to account for the height of the subfloor when building the basement stairs. First, they told me that the bottom step in the stairs would have to be short to compensate, but we told them we would not accept that, as it would be easy to trip on it. Later I found out that this is against the local building code! Instead, what they did (without consulting with us) is to put the plywood subfloor directly on the concrete, with a plastic film in the middle (moisture barrier?), with no sleepers. The plywood seems to be somehow nailed or screwed on the concrete. This is clearly not what we are paying for, and I will loudly complain to them, but what I am wondering is if this is a good enough solution and I should just try to get some money back from them, or whether I should insist on PT sleepers under the plywood (and having the staircase replaced). Why are sleepers normally used under the subfloor anyway? What kind of problems can I expect long term with this setup? If I were to try to get some money back, what amount would be reasonable? What is a ballpark cost of putting those sleepers under the subfloor? The finished area in the basement is about 2000 sq ft. Thanks for any advice…

Response:

Question:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> We’re getting ready to finalize contractor choice for the construction > of our new home, and I’m doing my best to understand the bids in detail > as well as to help define alternate sources for various materials and > parts used in the house.  One of the items that seems to have a fair > amount of "spread" is the wood floors.  Do any of you know of any > wood floor suppliers that are particularly inexpensive "high value"? > (I hesitate to say "cheap", because we don’t want crap.  I just don’t > want to throw good money after bad.) > We would like a "rustic" feel, so knots and nailholes are acceptable > (within limits).  We prefer the larger plank widths, maybe as wide as 8 > inces or so.  We are not set on a particular type of wood, although oak > is far from our favorite.  Used/recycled floors are perfectly fine.  If > it helps to reduce the final (installed) cost, we’re also fine with > prefinished floors.  The only real restriction is that we don’t want > laminate or "engineered" materials.

I think you will find that wide-plank and reclaimed is synonymous for about as expensive as you can buy these days, short of exotic woods from Africa. Wide planks are nearly impossible to find, except as reclaimed, and that’s costly. If you are lucky and don’t mind doing some work yourself, find an old barn and negotiate for the wood. Use a magnet to find all the old nails and remove them. Then get yourself a jointer to square the edges, a thickness planer to bring them to the same thickness (3/4" or more), and then use a shaper/router to turn them into tongue and groove planks. Then you can install them.

Response:

I know of a demolition store in Houston that usually carries used flooring. If interested, e-mail me by reversing the 1st 5 letters of my address.

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> We’re getting ready to finalize contractor choice for the construction > of our new home, and I’m doing my best to understand the bids in detail > as well as to help define alternate sources for various materials and > parts used in the house.  One of the items that seems to have a fair > amount of "spread" is the wood floors.  Do any of you know of any > wood floor suppliers that are particularly inexpensive "high value"? > (I hesitate to say "cheap", because we don’t want crap.  I just don’t > want to throw good money after bad.) > We would like a "rustic" feel, so knots and nailholes are acceptable > (within limits).  We prefer the larger plank widths, maybe as wide as 8 > inces or so.  We are not set on a particular type of wood, although oak > is far from our favorite.  Used/recycled floors are perfectly fine.  If > it helps to reduce the final (installed) cost, we’re also fine with > prefinished floors.  The only real restriction is that we don’t want > laminate or "engineered" materials. > Any suggestions? > jim andrews > austin, tx

Response:

I thought he said he *didn’t* want that stuff ? Having said that, we put Armstrong Swiftlock *Springfield Maple* in our house and we are very pleased with it. It looks simply stunning, and seems to hold up well, so far.

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> My huband and I did our floors with Bruce’s Hardwood floors, messy as all > get out, but we had our kids helping out, it is that easy. Regretfully I > used an off brand of laminate flooring in the boy’s bedroom and it is not > nearly as nice. If you do it yourself you save and if it isn’t a high > traffic area, use hardwood, Pergo presto went in the living room and after 2 > years looks brand new…we have 5 active kids..so it speaks for itself… > Frugal housewife > We’re getting ready to finalize contractor choice for the construction > of our new home, and I’m doing my best to understand the bids in detail > as well as to help define alternate sources for various materials and > parts used in the house.  One of the items that seems to have a fair > amount of "spread" is the wood floors.  Do any of you know of any > wood floor suppliers that are particularly inexpensive "high value"? > (I hesitate to say "cheap", because we don’t want crap.  I just don’t > want to throw good money after bad.) > We would like a "rustic" feel, so knots and nailholes are acceptable > (within limits).  We prefer the larger plank widths, maybe as wide as 8 > inces or so.  We are not set on a particular type of wood, although oak > is far from our favorite.  Used/recycled floors are perfectly fine.  If > it helps to reduce the final (installed) cost, we’re also fine with > prefinished floors.  The only real restriction is that we don’t want > laminate or "engineered" materials. > Any suggestions? > jim andrews > austin, tx

Response:

Wide, antique-y, and/or recycled planks are MORE expensive because they have character and are way more rare than new materials. If you don’t want manufactured flooring material, try the milled hardwood planks which are 2.5 or 3 inches wide, often oak. -Bruce

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> We’re getting ready to finalize contractor choice for the construction > of our new home, and I’m doing my best to understand the bids in detail > as well as to help define alternate sources for various materials and > parts used in the house.  One of the items that seems to have a fair > amount of "spread" is the wood floors.  Do any of you know of any > wood floor suppliers that are particularly inexpensive "high value"? > (I hesitate to say "cheap", because we don’t want crap.  I just don’t > want to throw good money after bad.) > We would like a "rustic" feel, so knots and nailholes are acceptable > (within limits).  We prefer the larger plank widths, maybe as wide as 8 > inces or so.  We are not set on a particular type of wood, although oak > is far from our favorite.  Used/recycled floors are perfectly fine.  If > it helps to reduce the final (installed) cost, we’re also fine with > prefinished floors.  The only real restriction is that we don’t want > laminate or "engineered" materials. > Any suggestions? > jim andrews > austin, tx

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – >We’re getting ready to finalize contractor choice for the construction >of our new home, and I’m doing my best to understand the bids in detail >as well as to help define alternate sources for various materials and >parts used in the house.  One of the items that seems to have a fair >amount of "spread" is the wood floors.  Do any of you know of any >wood floor suppliers that are particularly inexpensive "high value"?   >(I hesitate to say "cheap", because we don’t want crap.  I just don’t >want to throw good money after bad.) >We would like a "rustic" feel, so knots and nailholes are acceptable >(within limits).  We prefer the larger plank widths, maybe as wide as 8 >inces or so.  We are not set on a particular type of wood, although oak >is far from our favorite.  Used/recycled floors are perfectly fine.  If >it helps to reduce the final (installed) cost, we’re also fine with >prefinished floors.  The only real restriction is that we don’t want >laminate or "engineered" materials.   >Any suggestions? >jim andrews >austin, tx

Take a look at this for info and maybe a source: http://www.huskyfloors.com/home.html

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->We’re getting ready to finalize contractor choice for the construction >of our new home, and I’m doing my best to understand the bids in detail >as well as to help define alternate sources for various materials and >parts used in the house.  One of the items that seems to have a fair >amount of "spread" is the wood floors.  Do any of you know of any >wood floor suppliers that are particularly inexpensive "high value"? >(I hesitate to say "cheap", because we don’t want crap.  I just don’t >want to throw good money after bad.) >We would like a "rustic" feel, so knots and nailholes are acceptable >(within limits).  We prefer the larger plank widths, maybe as wide as 8 >inces or so.  We are not set on a particular type of wood, although oak >is far from our favorite.  Used/recycled floors are perfectly fine.  If >it helps to reduce the final (installed) cost, we’re also fine with >prefinished floors.  The only real restriction is that we don’t want >laminate or "engineered" materials. >Any suggestions? >jim andrews >austin, tx > Take a look at this for info and maybe a source: > http://www.huskyfloors.com/home.html

Just saw an ad on TV for www.lumberliquidators.com they seem to have some reasonable prices.

Response:

We’re getting ready to finalize contractor choice for the construction of our new home, and I’m doing my best to understand the bids in detail as well as to help define alternate sources for various materials and parts used in the house.  One of the items that seems to have a fair amount of "spread" is the wood floors.  Do any of you know of any wood floor suppliers that are particularly inexpensive "high value"?   (I hesitate to say "cheap", because we don’t want crap.  I just don’t want to throw good money after bad.) We would like a "rustic" feel, so knots and nailholes are acceptable (within limits).  We prefer the larger plank widths, maybe as wide as 8 inces or so.  We are not set on a particular type of wood, although oak is far from our favorite.  Used/recycled floors are perfectly fine.  If it helps to reduce the final (installed) cost, we’re also fine with prefinished floors.  The only real restriction is that we don’t want laminate or "engineered" materials.   Any suggestions? jim andrews austin, tx

Response:

My huband and I did our floors with Bruce’s Hardwood floors, messy as all get out, but we had our kids helping out, it is that easy. Regretfully I used an off brand of laminate flooring in the boy’s bedroom and it is not nearly as nice. If you do it yourself you save and if it isn’t a high traffic area, use hardwood, Pergo presto went in the living room and after 2 years looks brand new…we have 5 active kids..so it speaks for itself… Frugal housewife

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> We’re getting ready to finalize contractor choice for the construction > of our new home, and I’m doing my best to understand the bids in detail > as well as to help define alternate sources for various materials and > parts used in the house.  One of the items that seems to have a fair > amount of "spread" is the wood floors.  Do any of you know of any > wood floor suppliers that are particularly inexpensive "high value"? > (I hesitate to say "cheap", because we don’t want crap.  I just don’t > want to throw good money after bad.) > We would like a "rustic" feel, so knots and nailholes are acceptable > (within limits).  We prefer the larger plank widths, maybe as wide as 8 > inces or so.  We are not set on a particular type of wood, although oak > is far from our favorite.  Used/recycled floors are perfectly fine.  If > it helps to reduce the final (installed) cost, we’re also fine with > prefinished floors.  The only real restriction is that we don’t want > laminate or "engineered" materials. > Any suggestions? > jim andrews > austin, tx

Response:

My huband and I did our floors with Bruce’s Hardwood floors, messy as all get out, but we had our kids helping out, it is that easy. Regretfully I used an off brand of laminate flooring in the boy’s bedroom and it is not nearly as nice. If you do it yourself you save and if it isn’t a high traffic area, use hardwood, Pergo presto went in the living room and after 2 years looks brand new…we have 5 active kids..so it speaks for itself… Frugal housewife

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> We’re getting ready to finalize contractor choice for the construction > of our new home, and I’m doing my best to understand the bids in detail > as well as to help define alternate sources for various materials and > parts used in the house.  One of the items that seems to have a fair > amount of "spread" is the wood floors.  Do any of you know of any > wood floor suppliers that are particularly inexpensive "high value"? > (I hesitate to say "cheap", because we don’t want crap.  I just don’t > want to throw good money after bad.) > We would like a "rustic" feel, so knots and nailholes are acceptable > (within limits).  We prefer the larger plank widths, maybe as wide as 8 > inces or so.  We are not set on a particular type of wood, although oak > is far from our favorite.  Used/recycled floors are perfectly fine.  If > it helps to reduce the final (installed) cost, we’re also fine with > prefinished floors.  The only real restriction is that we don’t want > laminate or "engineered" materials. > Any suggestions? > jim andrews > austin, tx

Response:

I thought he said he *didn’t* want that stuff ? Having said that, we put Armstrong Swiftlock *Springfield Maple* in our house and we are very pleased with it. It looks simply stunning, and seems to hold up well, so far.

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> My huband and I did our floors with Bruce’s Hardwood floors, messy as all > get out, but we had our kids helping out, it is that easy. Regretfully I > used an off brand of laminate flooring in the boy’s bedroom and it is not > nearly as nice. If you do it yourself you save and if it isn’t a high > traffic area, use hardwood, Pergo presto went in the living room and after 2 > years looks brand new…we have 5 active kids..so it speaks for itself… > Frugal housewife > We’re getting ready to finalize contractor choice for the construction > of our new home, and I’m doing my best to understand the bids in detail > as well as to help define alternate sources for various materials and > parts used in the house.  One of the items that seems to have a fair > amount of "spread" is the wood floors.  Do any of you know of any > wood floor suppliers that are particularly inexpensive "high value"? > (I hesitate to say "cheap", because we don’t want crap.  I just don’t > want to throw good money after bad.) > We would like a "rustic" feel, so knots and nailholes are acceptable > (within limits).  We prefer the larger plank widths, maybe as wide as 8 > inces or so.  We are not set on a particular type of wood, although oak > is far from our favorite.  Used/recycled floors are perfectly fine.  If > it helps to reduce the final (installed) cost, we’re also fine with > prefinished floors.  The only real restriction is that we don’t want > laminate or "engineered" materials. > Any suggestions? > jim andrews > austin, tx

Response:

Wide, antique-y, and/or recycled planks are MORE expensive because they have character and are way more rare than new materials. If you don’t want manufactured flooring material, try the milled hardwood planks which are 2.5 or 3 inches wide, often oak. -Bruce

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> We’re getting ready to finalize contractor choice for the construction > of our new home, and I’m doing my best to understand the bids in detail > as well as to help define alternate sources for various materials and > parts used in the house.  One of the items that seems to have a fair > amount of "spread" is the wood floors.  Do any of you know of any > wood floor suppliers that are particularly inexpensive "high value"? > (I hesitate to say "cheap", because we don’t want crap.  I just don’t > want to throw good money after bad.) > We would like a "rustic" feel, so knots and nailholes are acceptable > (within limits).  We prefer the larger plank widths, maybe as wide as 8 > inces or so.  We are not set on a particular type of wood, although oak > is far from our favorite.  Used/recycled floors are perfectly fine.  If > it helps to reduce the final (installed) cost, we’re also fine with > prefinished floors.  The only real restriction is that we don’t want > laminate or "engineered" materials. > Any suggestions? > jim andrews > austin, tx

Response:

I know of a demolition store in Houston that usually carries used flooring. If interested, e-mail me by reversing the 1st 5 letters of my address.

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> We’re getting ready to finalize contractor choice for the construction > of our new home, and I’m doing my best to understand the bids in detail > as well as to help define alternate sources for various materials and > parts used in the house.  One of the items that seems to have a fair > amount of "spread" is the wood floors.  Do any of you know of any > wood floor suppliers that are particularly inexpensive "high value"? > (I hesitate to say "cheap", because we don’t want crap.  I just don’t > want to throw good money after bad.) > We would like a "rustic" feel, so knots and nailholes are acceptable > (within limits).  We prefer the larger plank widths, maybe as wide as 8 > inces or so.  We are not set on a particular type of wood, although oak > is far from our favorite.  Used/recycled floors are perfectly fine.  If > it helps to reduce the final (installed) cost, we’re also fine with > prefinished floors.  The only real restriction is that we don’t want > laminate or "engineered" materials. > Any suggestions? > jim andrews > austin, tx

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – >We’re getting ready to finalize contractor choice for the construction >of our new home, and I’m doing my best to understand the bids in detail >as well as to help define alternate sources for various materials and >parts used in the house.  One of the items that seems to have a fair >amount of "spread" is the wood floors.  Do any of you know of any >wood floor suppliers that are particularly inexpensive "high value"?   >(I hesitate to say "cheap", because we don’t want crap.  I just don’t >want to throw good money after bad.) >We would like a "rustic" feel, so knots and nailholes are acceptable >(within limits).  We prefer the larger plank widths, maybe as wide as 8 >inces or so.  We are not set on a particular type of wood, although oak >is far from our favorite.  Used/recycled floors are perfectly fine.  If >it helps to reduce the final (installed) cost, we’re also fine with >prefinished floors.  The only real restriction is that we don’t want >laminate or "engineered" materials.   >Any suggestions? >jim andrews >austin, tx

Take a look at this for info and maybe a source: http://www.huskyfloors.com/home.html

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->We’re getting ready to finalize contractor choice for the construction >of our new home, and I’m doing my best to understand the bids in detail >as well as to help define alternate sources for various materials and >parts used in the house.  One of the items that seems to have a fair >amount of "spread" is the wood floors.  Do any of you know of any >wood floor suppliers that are particularly inexpensive "high value"? >(I hesitate to say "cheap", because we don’t want crap.  I just don’t >want to throw good money after bad.) >We would like a "rustic" feel, so knots and nailholes are acceptable >(within limits).  We prefer the larger plank widths, maybe as wide as 8 >inces or so.  We are not set on a particular type of wood, although oak >is far from our favorite.  Used/recycled floors are perfectly fine.  If >it helps to reduce the final (installed) cost, we’re also fine with >prefinished floors.  The only real restriction is that we don’t want >laminate or "engineered" materials. >Any suggestions? >jim andrews >austin, tx > Take a look at this for info and maybe a source: > http://www.huskyfloors.com/home.html

Just saw an ad on TV for www.lumberliquidators.com they seem to have some reasonable prices.

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> We’re getting ready to finalize contractor choice for the construction > of our new home, and I’m doing my best to understand the bids in detail > as well as to help define alternate sources for various materials and > parts used in the house.  One of the items that seems to have a fair > amount of "spread" is the wood floors.  Do any of you know of any > wood floor suppliers that are particularly inexpensive "high value"? > (I hesitate to say "cheap", because we don’t want crap.  I just don’t > want to throw good money after bad.) > We would like a "rustic" feel, so knots and nailholes are acceptable > (within limits).  We prefer the larger plank widths, maybe as wide as 8 > inces or so.  We are not set on a particular type of wood, although oak > is far from our favorite.  Used/recycled floors are perfectly fine.  If > it helps to reduce the final (installed) cost, we’re also fine with > prefinished floors.  The only real restriction is that we don’t want > laminate or "engineered" materials.

I think you will find that wide-plank and reclaimed is synonymous for about as expensive as you can buy these days, short of exotic woods from Africa. Wide planks are nearly impossible to find, except as reclaimed, and that’s costly. If you are lucky and don’t mind doing some work yourself, find an old barn and negotiate for the wood. Use a magnet to find all the old nails and remove them. Then get yourself a jointer to square the edges, a thickness planer to bring them to the same thickness (3/4" or more), and then use a shaper/router to turn them into tongue and groove planks. Then you can install them.

Response:

We’re getting ready to finalize contractor choice for the construction of our new home, and I’m doing my best to understand the bids in detail as well as to help define alternate sources for various materials and parts used in the house.  One of the items that seems to have a fair amount of "spread" is the wood floors.  Do any of you know of any wood floor suppliers that are particularly inexpensive "high value"?   (I hesitate to say "cheap", because we don’t want crap.  I just don’t want to throw good money after bad.) We would like a "rustic" feel, so knots and nailholes are acceptable (within limits).  We prefer the larger plank widths, maybe as wide as 8 inces or so.  We are not set on a particular type of wood, although oak is far from our favorite.  Used/recycled floors are perfectly fine.  If it helps to reduce the final (installed) cost, we’re also fine with prefinished floors.  The only real restriction is that we don’t want laminate or "engineered" materials.   Any suggestions? jim andrews austin, tx

Response:

My huband and I did our floors with Bruce’s Hardwood floors, messy as all get out, but we had our kids helping out, it is that easy. Regretfully I used an off brand of laminate flooring in the boy’s bedroom and it is not nearly as nice. If you do it yourself you save and if it isn’t a high traffic area, use hardwood, Pergo presto went in the living room and after 2 years looks brand new…we have 5 active kids..so it speaks for itself… Frugal housewife

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> We’re getting ready to finalize contractor choice for the construction > of our new home, and I’m doing my best to understand the bids in detail > as well as to help define alternate sources for various materials and > parts used in the house.  One of the items that seems to have a fair > amount of "spread" is the wood floors.  Do any of you know of any > wood floor suppliers that are particularly inexpensive "high value"? > (I hesitate to say "cheap", because we don’t want crap.  I just don’t > want to throw good money after bad.) > We would like a "rustic" feel, so knots and nailholes are acceptable > (within limits).  We prefer the larger plank widths, maybe as wide as 8 > inces or so.  We are not set on a particular type of wood, although oak > is far from our favorite.  Used/recycled floors are perfectly fine.  If > it helps to reduce the final (installed) cost, we’re also fine with > prefinished floors.  The only real restriction is that we don’t want > laminate or "engineered" materials. > Any suggestions? > jim andrews > austin, tx

Response:

I thought he said he *didn’t* want that stuff ? Having said that, we put Armstrong Swiftlock *Springfield Maple* in our house and we are very pleased with it. It looks simply stunning, and seems to hold up well, so far.

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> My huband and I did our floors with Bruce’s Hardwood floors, messy as all > get out, but we had our kids helping out, it is that easy. Regretfully I > used an off brand of laminate flooring in the boy’s bedroom and it is not > nearly as nice. If you do it yourself you save and if it isn’t a high > traffic area, use hardwood, Pergo presto went in the living room and after 2 > years looks brand new…we have 5 active kids..so it speaks for itself… > Frugal housewife > We’re getting ready to finalize contractor choice for the construction > of our new home, and I’m doing my best to understand the bids in detail > as well as to help define alternate sources for various materials and > parts used in the house.  One of the items that seems to have a fair > amount of "spread" is the wood floors.  Do any of you know of any > wood floor suppliers that are particularly inexpensive "high value"? > (I hesitate to say "cheap", because we don’t want crap.  I just don’t > want to throw good money after bad.) > We would like a "rustic" feel, so knots and nailholes are acceptable > (within limits).  We prefer the larger plank widths, maybe as wide as 8 > inces or so.  We are not set on a particular type of wood, although oak > is far from our favorite.  Used/recycled floors are perfectly fine.  If > it helps to reduce the final (installed) cost, we’re also fine with > prefinished floors.  The only real restriction is that we don’t want > laminate or "engineered" materials. > Any suggestions? > jim andrews > austin, tx

Response:

Wide, antique-y, and/or recycled planks are MORE expensive because they have character and are way more rare than new materials. If you don’t want manufactured flooring material, try the milled hardwood planks which are 2.5 or 3 inches wide, often oak. -Bruce

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> We’re getting ready to finalize contractor choice for the construction > of our new home, and I’m doing my best to understand the bids in detail > as well as to help define alternate sources for various materials and > parts used in the house.  One of the items that seems to have a fair > amount of "spread" is the wood floors.  Do any of you know of any > wood floor suppliers that are particularly inexpensive "high value"? > (I hesitate to say "cheap", because we don’t want crap.  I just don’t > want to throw good money after bad.) > We would like a "rustic" feel, so knots and nailholes are acceptable > (within limits).  We prefer the larger plank widths, maybe as wide as 8 > inces or so.  We are not set on a particular type of wood, although oak > is far from our favorite.  Used/recycled floors are perfectly fine.  If > it helps to reduce the final (installed) cost, we’re also fine with > prefinished floors.  The only real restriction is that we don’t want > laminate or "engineered" materials. > Any suggestions? > jim andrews > austin, tx

Response:

I know of a demolition store in Houston that usually carries used flooring. If interested, e-mail me by reversing the 1st 5 letters of my address.

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> We’re getting ready to finalize contractor choice for the construction > of our new home, and I’m doing my best to understand the bids in detail > as well as to help define alternate sources for various materials and > parts used in the house.  One of the items that seems to have a fair > amount of "spread" is the wood floors.  Do any of you know of any > wood floor suppliers that are particularly inexpensive "high value"? > (I hesitate to say "cheap", because we don’t want crap.  I just don’t > want to throw good money after bad.) > We would like a "rustic" feel, so knots and nailholes are acceptable > (within limits).  We prefer the larger plank widths, maybe as wide as 8 > inces or so.  We are not set on a particular type of wood, although oak > is far from our favorite.  Used/recycled floors are perfectly fine.  If > it helps to reduce the final (installed) cost, we’re also fine with > prefinished floors.  The only real restriction is that we don’t want > laminate or "engineered" materials. > Any suggestions? > jim andrews > austin, tx

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – >We’re getting ready to finalize contractor choice for the construction >of our new home, and I’m doing my best to understand the bids in detail >as well as to help define alternate sources for various materials and >parts used in the house.  One of the items that seems to have a fair >amount of "spread" is the wood floors.  Do any of you know of any >wood floor suppliers that are particularly inexpensive "high value"?   >(I hesitate to say "cheap", because we don’t want crap.  I just don’t >want to throw good money after bad.) >We would like a "rustic" feel, so knots and nailholes are acceptable >(within limits).  We prefer the larger plank widths, maybe as wide as 8 >inces or so.  We are not set on a particular type of wood, although oak >is far from our favorite.  Used/recycled floors are perfectly fine.  If >it helps to reduce the final (installed) cost, we’re also fine with >prefinished floors.  The only real restriction is that we don’t want >laminate or "engineered" materials.   >Any suggestions? >jim andrews >austin, tx

Take a look at this for info and maybe a source: http://www.huskyfloors.com/home.html

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->We’re getting ready to finalize contractor choice for the construction >of our new home, and I’m doing my best to understand the bids in detail >as well as to help define alternate sources for various materials and >parts used in the house.  One of the items that seems to have a fair >amount of "spread" is the wood floors.  Do any of you know of any >wood floor suppliers that are particularly inexpensive "high value"? >(I hesitate to say "cheap", because we don’t want crap.  I just don’t >want to throw good money after bad.) >We would like a "rustic" feel, so knots and nailholes are acceptable >(within limits).  We prefer the larger plank widths, maybe as wide as 8 >inces or so.  We are not set on a particular type of wood, although oak >is far from our favorite.  Used/recycled floors are perfectly fine.  If >it helps to reduce the final (installed) cost, we’re also fine with >prefinished floors.  The only real restriction is that we don’t want >laminate or "engineered" materials. >Any suggestions? >jim andrews >austin, tx > Take a look at this for info and maybe a source: > http://www.huskyfloors.com/home.html

Just saw an ad on TV for www.lumberliquidators.com they seem to have some reasonable prices.

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> We’re getting ready to finalize contractor choice for the construction > of our new home, and I’m doing my best to understand the bids in detail > as well as to help define alternate sources for various materials and > parts used in the house.  One of the items that seems to have a fair > amount of "spread" is the wood floors.  Do any of you know of any > wood floor suppliers that are particularly inexpensive "high value"? > (I hesitate to say "cheap", because we don’t want crap.  I just don’t > want to throw good money after bad.) > We would like a "rustic" feel, so knots and nailholes are acceptable > (within limits).  We prefer the larger plank widths, maybe as wide as 8 > inces or so.  We are not set on a particular type of wood, although oak > is far from our favorite.  Used/recycled floors are perfectly fine.  If > it helps to reduce the final (installed) cost, we’re also fine with > prefinished floors.  The only real restriction is that we don’t want > laminate or "engineered" materials.

I think you will find that wide-plank and reclaimed is synonymous for about as expensive as you can buy these days, short of exotic woods from Africa. Wide planks are nearly impossible to find, except as reclaimed, and that’s costly. If you are lucky and don’t mind doing some work yourself, find an old barn and negotiate for the wood. Use a magnet to find all the old nails and remove them. Then get yourself a jointer to square the edges, a thickness planer to bring them to the same thickness (3/4" or more), and then use a shaper/router to turn them into tongue and groove planks. Then you can install them.

Response:

We’re getting ready to finalize contractor choice for the construction of our new home, and I’m doing my best to understand the bids in detail as well as to help define alternate sources for various materials and parts used in the house.  One of the items that seems to have a fair amount of "spread" is the wood floors.  Do any of you know of any wood floor suppliers that are particularly inexpensive "high value"?   (I hesitate to say "cheap", because we don’t want crap.  I just don’t want to throw good money after bad.) We would like a "rustic" feel, so knots and nailholes are acceptable (within limits).  We prefer the larger plank widths, maybe as wide as 8 inces or so.  We are not set on a particular type of wood, although oak is far from our favorite.  Used/recycled floors are perfectly fine.  If it helps to reduce the final (installed) cost, we’re also fine with prefinished floors.  The only real restriction is that we don’t want laminate or "engineered" materials.   Any suggestions? jim andrews austin, tx

Response:

Question:

Yes you can put it over top of the parquet.   If the floor is solid and not squeeking all over the place, you can focus on getting it pretty level and do your install. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – > Is it okay to install laminate flooring (like Pergo) on top of a wood > parquet tile floor (with the foam underlayment over the parquet, of > course), rather than removing the parquet first? > Here’s my situation.  I have a 350 sq. ft. room that is about 70% carpet, > 30% parquet.  I was planning to pull up the carpet and the parquet and > install laminate flooring (the brand is Columbia Clic, a glueless > laminate) onto the plywood floor beneath. > When I pulled up the carpet, I got two surprises. > First, the carpet was installed over the parquet.  I’d figured that the > carpet was over the plywood.  I’ll admit, a major part of my wanting to > install right over the parquet is laziness — I don’t want to pull up that > much tile. > But there’s another thing: in an approximately 5 ft. x 2 1/2 ft. area in > front of a sliding glass door, there is no parquet.  Instead, there’s a > piece of plywood.  It looks like the plywood is thicker than the parquet > tile, and fits into a cutting of the plywood floor.  If I pull the > parquet, I’ll have to get this piece of plywood out, too, and replace it > with another piece that’s about 1/4 inch thinner.  I’m reluctant to do > that, both because i don’t know the reason for this separate piece of wood > and because I’m a little worried that replacing it with a thinner piece > would weaken the floor there. > I’d already pulled up about 60 square feet of the parquet, so (kicking > myself for doing unnecessary work before pulling up the carpet) I’m > thinking of putting down a thin layer of plywood to replace the parquet I > pulled up, and then installing the laminate over the entire thing: the > parquet, that mysterious piece of plywood by the glass door, and my > replacement layer. > Thoughts? > — > Terry Carroll        | > Santa Clara, CA      |   "The parties are advised to chill." > Modell delendus est  |         no. 98-56577 (9th Cir. July 24, 2002)

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Is it okay to install laminate flooring (like Pergo) on top of a wood > parquet tile floor (with the foam underlayment over the parquet, of > course), rather than removing the parquet first? > Here’s my situation.  I have a 350 sq. ft. room that is about 70% carpet, > 30% parquet.  I was planning to pull up the carpet and the parquet and > install laminate flooring (the brand is Columbia Clic, a glueless > laminate) onto the plywood floor beneath. > When I pulled up the carpet, I got two surprises. > First, the carpet was installed over the parquet.  I’d figured that the > carpet was over the plywood.  I’ll admit, a major part of my wanting to > install right over the parquet is laziness — I don’t want to pull up that > much tile. > But there’s another thing: in an approximately 5 ft. x 2 1/2 ft. area in > front of a sliding glass door, there is no parquet.  Instead, there’s a > piece of plywood.  It looks like the plywood is thicker than the parquet > tile, and fits into a cutting of the plywood floor.  If I pull the > parquet, I’ll have to get this piece of plywood out, too, and replace it > with another piece that’s about 1/4 inch thinner.  I’m reluctant to do > that, both because i don’t know the reason for this separate piece of wood > and because I’m a little worried that replacing it with a thinner piece > would weaken the floor there. > I’d already pulled up about 60 square feet of the parquet, so (kicking > myself for doing unnecessary work before pulling up the carpet) I’m > thinking of putting down a thin layer of plywood to replace the parquet I > pulled up, and then installing the laminate over the entire thing: the > parquet, that mysterious piece of plywood by the glass door, and my > replacement layer. > Thoughts? > — > Terry Carroll        | > Santa Clara, CA      |   "The parties are advised to chill." > Modell delendus est  |         no. 98-56577 (9th Cir. July 24, 2002)

I would do as you suggest. I see nothing wrong with it as long as you are laying on a flush surface.

Response:

> 1. The patch by the slider is probably where somebody had an oopsie, and > trashed some of the parquet floor, or they needed to get at something > under the floor and didn’t have access from below. The question is > what is below the patch- the real plywood subfloor, or air and > joists? Can you se it from below?

I went down into the crawl space this morning and found: just air and joists.  Now I’m really reluctant to replace it. > 2. If the patch is higher than the surrounding parquet, the bump may > telegraph thru the laminate, or cause joint problems.

The existing patch (by the slide) seems perfectly level — kind of surprising, since it’s essentially a raised subfloor, whose top is level with the parquet tile.  My only concern is getting my new field level as well. > The parquet isn’t glued directly to the plywood. is it? It should have > been put down over felt or resin paper. Unless a slob installed it, > removal shouldn’t be THAT hard…

Yeah, it’s glued directly to the subfloor — no felt ot resin paper.   > Another reason to strip entire floor is to avoid having to deal with the > humps at doorways and floor transitions.

There’s only a single transition (4-foot wide, where the room meets the tiled entryway), so I have to deal with that anyway. >4. IMHO, anything but laminate-

No, we’ve done our due diligence and made our decision there, and already purchased the laminate.   That part’s not up for revisiting. Thanks for your help on this. — Terry Carroll        |   Santa Clara, CA      |   "The parties are advised to chill." Modell delendus est  |         no. 98-56577 (9th Cir. July 24, 2002)

Response:

>I would do as you suggest. I see nothing wrong with it as long as you are >laying on a flush surface.

Thanks.  I’m still undecided, but I’m leaning that way. — Terry Carroll        |   Santa Clara, CA      |   "The parties are advised to chill." Modell delendus est  |         no. 98-56577 (9th Cir. July 24, 2002)

Response:

Is it okay to install laminate flooring (like Pergo) on top of a wood parquet tile floor (with the foam underlayment over the parquet, of course), rather than removing the parquet first? Here’s my situation.  I have a 350 sq. ft. room that is about 70% carpet, 30% parquet.  I was planning to pull up the carpet and the parquet and install laminate flooring (the brand is Columbia Clic, a glueless laminate) onto the plywood floor beneath. When I pulled up the carpet, I got two surprises. First, the carpet was installed over the parquet.  I’d figured that the carpet was over the plywood.  I’ll admit, a major part of my wanting to install right over the parquet is laziness — I don’t want to pull up that much tile. But there’s another thing: in an approximately 5 ft. x 2 1/2 ft. area in front of a sliding glass door, there is no parquet.  Instead, there’s a piece of plywood.  It looks like the plywood is thicker than the parquet tile, and fits into a cutting of the plywood floor.  If I pull the parquet, I’ll have to get this piece of plywood out, too, and replace it with another piece that’s about 1/4 inch thinner.  I’m reluctant to do that, both because i don’t know the reason for this separate piece of wood and because I’m a little worried that replacing it with a thinner piece would weaken the floor there. I’d already pulled up about 60 square feet of the parquet, so (kicking myself for doing unnecessary work before pulling up the carpet) I’m thinking of putting down a thin layer of plywood to replace the parquet I pulled up, and then installing the laminate over the entire thing: the parquet, that mysterious piece of plywood by the glass door, and my replacement layer. Thoughts? — Terry Carroll        |   Santa Clara, CA      |   "The parties are advised to chill." Modell delendus est  |         no. 98-56577 (9th Cir. July 24, 2002)

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Is it okay to install laminate flooring (like Pergo) on top of a wood > parquet tile floor (with the foam underlayment over the parquet, of > course), rather than removing the parquet first? > Here’s my situation.  I have a 350 sq. ft. room that is about 70% carpet, > 30% parquet.  I was planning to pull up the carpet and the parquet and > install laminate flooring (the brand is Columbia Clic, a glueless > laminate) onto the plywood floor beneath. > When I pulled up the carpet, I got two surprises. > First, the carpet was installed over the parquet.  I’d figured that the > carpet was over the plywood.  I’ll admit, a major part of my wanting to > install right over the parquet is laziness — I don’t want to pull up that > much tile. > But there’s another thing: in an approximately 5 ft. x 2 1/2 ft. area in > front of a sliding glass door, there is no parquet.  Instead, there’s a > piece of plywood.  It looks like the plywood is thicker than the parquet > tile, and fits into a cutting of the plywood floor.  If I pull the > parquet, I’ll have to get this piece of plywood out, too, and replace it > with another piece that’s about 1/4 inch thinner.  I’m reluctant to do > that, both because i don’t know the reason for this separate piece of wood > and because I’m a little worried that replacing it with a thinner piece > would weaken the floor there. > I’d already pulled up about 60 square feet of the parquet, so (kicking > myself for doing unnecessary work before pulling up the carpet) I’m > thinking of putting down a thin layer of plywood to replace the parquet I > pulled up, and then installing the laminate over the entire thing: the > parquet, that mysterious piece of plywood by the glass door, and my > replacement layer. > Thoughts?

1. The patch by the slider is probably where somebody had an oopsie, and trashed some of the parquet floor, or they needed to get at something under the floor and didn’t have access from below. The question is what is below the patch- the real plywood subfloor, or air and joists? Can you se it from below? 2. If the patch is higher than the surrounding parquet, the bump may telegraph thru the laminate, or cause joint problems. The thin foam doesn’t work like carpet pad- it is mainly so the floating laminate can slide around with temp changes. You need the floor to be level, and free of squeeks and mushy spots. Laminate will highlight any peaks or valleys, since it is so thin and shiny. You need to pull the patch, and replace with something thinner. There is <probably> another layer of plywood underneath. 3. At this point, floor is such a mess, I would pull it all up down to the plywood, just so I could look for mushy spots and bad nailing, and patch in as needed. And depending on the the type of subfloor recommended by the maker of the laminate, and how thick it is, you may need to put down a layer of chipboard, to get the floor smooth and the height correct. The parquet isn’t glued directly to the plywood. is it? It should have been put down over felt or resin paper. Unless a slob installed it, removal shouldn’t be THAT hard, since you won’t be trying to save it for reuse. Another reason to strip entire floor is to avoid having to deal with the humps at doorways and floor transitions. Any shortcuts you take now, you may have to live with for years. Better to do it right the first time, and never have to worry about it again. 4. IMHO, anything but laminate- I haven’t seen any that didn’t look like what it is- a picture of wood. (Or do they now make laminate with a layer of real wood on top?)  If you do all the prep work and present them with a clean solid subfloor, pull the baseboard, etc, having a pro put down prefinish hardwood might be less expensive than you think. But if you like having a giant kitchen counter in your living room- different people have different tastes, I guess. aem sends….

Response:

Is it okay to install laminate flooring (like Pergo) on top of a wood parquet tile floor (with the foam underlayment over the parquet, of course), rather than removing the parquet first? Here’s my situation.  I have a 350 sq. ft. room that is about 70% carpet, 30% parquet.  I was planning to pull up the carpet and the parquet and install laminate flooring (the brand is Columbia Clic, a glueless laminate) onto the plywood floor beneath. When I pulled up the carpet, I got two surprises. First, the carpet was installed over the parquet.  I’d figured that the carpet was over the plywood.  I’ll admit, a major part of my wanting to install right over the parquet is laziness — I don’t want to pull up that much tile. But there’s another thing: in an approximately 5 ft. x 2 1/2 ft. area in front of a sliding glass door, there is no parquet.  Instead, there’s a piece of plywood.  It looks like the plywood is thicker than the parquet tile, and fits into a cutting of the plywood floor.  If I pull the parquet, I’ll have to get this piece of plywood out, too, and replace it with another piece that’s about 1/4 inch thinner.  I’m reluctant to do that, both because i don’t know the reason for this separate piece of wood and because I’m a little worried that replacing it with a thinner piece would weaken the floor there. I’d already pulled up about 60 square feet of the parquet, so (kicking myself for doing unnecessary work before pulling up the carpet) I’m thinking of putting down a thin layer of plywood to replace the parquet I pulled up, and then installing the laminate over the entire thing: the parquet, that mysterious piece of plywood by the glass door, and my replacement layer. Thoughts? — Terry Carroll        |   Santa Clara, CA      |   "The parties are advised to chill." Modell delendus est  |         no. 98-56577 (9th Cir. July 24, 2002)

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Is it okay to install laminate flooring (like Pergo) on top of a wood > parquet tile floor (with the foam underlayment over the parquet, of > course), rather than removing the parquet first? > Here’s my situation.  I have a 350 sq. ft. room that is about 70% carpet, > 30% parquet.  I was planning to pull up the carpet and the parquet and > install laminate flooring (the brand is Columbia Clic, a glueless > laminate) onto the plywood floor beneath. > When I pulled up the carpet, I got two surprises. > First, the carpet was installed over the parquet.  I’d figured that the > carpet was over the plywood.  I’ll admit, a major part of my wanting to > install right over the parquet is laziness — I don’t want to pull up that > much tile. > But there’s another thing: in an approximately 5 ft. x 2 1/2 ft. area in > front of a sliding glass door, there is no parquet.  Instead, there’s a > piece of plywood.  It looks like the plywood is thicker than the parquet > tile, and fits into a cutting of the plywood floor.  If I pull the > parquet, I’ll have to get this piece of plywood out, too, and replace it > with another piece that’s about 1/4 inch thinner.  I’m reluctant to do > that, both because i don’t know the reason for this separate piece of wood > and because I’m a little worried that replacing it with a thinner piece > would weaken the floor there. > I’d already pulled up about 60 square feet of the parquet, so (kicking > myself for doing unnecessary work before pulling up the carpet) I’m > thinking of putting down a thin layer of plywood to replace the parquet I > pulled up, and then installing the laminate over the entire thing: the > parquet, that mysterious piece of plywood by the glass door, and my > replacement layer. > Thoughts?

1. The patch by the slider is probably where somebody had an oopsie, and trashed some of the parquet floor, or they needed to get at something under the floor and didn’t have access from below. The question is what is below the patch- the real plywood subfloor, or air and joists? Can you se it from below? 2. If the patch is higher than the surrounding parquet, the bump may telegraph thru the laminate, or cause joint problems. The thin foam doesn’t work like carpet pad- it is mainly so the floating laminate can slide around with temp changes. You need the floor to be level, and free of squeeks and mushy spots. Laminate will highlight any peaks or valleys, since it is so thin and shiny. You need to pull the patch, and replace with something thinner. There is <probably> another layer of plywood underneath. 3. At this point, floor is such a mess, I would pull it all up down to the plywood, just so I could look for mushy spots and bad nailing, and patch in as needed. And depending on the the type of subfloor recommended by the maker of the laminate, and how thick it is, you may need to put down a layer of chipboard, to get the floor smooth and the height correct. The parquet isn’t glued directly to the plywood. is it? It should have been put down over felt or resin paper. Unless a slob installed it, removal shouldn’t be THAT hard, since you won’t be trying to save it for reuse. Another reason to strip entire floor is to avoid having to deal with the humps at doorways and floor transitions. Any shortcuts you take now, you may have to live with for years. Better to do it right the first time, and never have to worry about it again. 4. IMHO, anything but laminate- I haven’t seen any that didn’t look like what it is- a picture of wood. (Or do they now make laminate with a layer of real wood on top?)  If you do all the prep work and present them with a clean solid subfloor, pull the baseboard, etc, having a pro put down prefinish hardwood might be less expensive than you think. But if you like having a giant kitchen counter in your living room- different people have different tastes, I guess. aem sends….

Response:

>I would do as you suggest. I see nothing wrong with it as long as you are >laying on a flush surface.

Thanks.  I’m still undecided, but I’m leaning that way. — Terry Carroll        |   Santa Clara, CA      |   "The parties are advised to chill." Modell delendus est  |         no. 98-56577 (9th Cir. July 24, 2002)

Response:

Yes you can put it over top of the parquet.   If the floor is solid and not squeeking all over the place, you can focus on getting it pretty level and do your install. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – > Is it okay to install laminate flooring (like Pergo) on top of a wood > parquet tile floor (with the foam underlayment over the parquet, of > course), rather than removing the parquet first? > Here’s my situation.  I have a 350 sq. ft. room that is about 70% carpet, > 30% parquet.  I was planning to pull up the carpet and the parquet and > install laminate flooring (the brand is Columbia Clic, a glueless > laminate) onto the plywood floor beneath. > When I pulled up the carpet, I got two surprises. > First, the carpet was installed over the parquet.  I’d figured that the > carpet was over the plywood.  I’ll admit, a major part of my wanting to > install right over the parquet is laziness — I don’t want to pull up that > much tile. > But there’s another thing: in an approximately 5 ft. x 2 1/2 ft. area in > front of a sliding glass door, there is no parquet.  Instead, there’s a > piece of plywood.  It looks like the plywood is thicker than the parquet > tile, and fits into a cutting of the plywood floor.  If I pull the > parquet, I’ll have to get this piece of plywood out, too, and replace it > with another piece that’s about 1/4 inch thinner.  I’m reluctant to do > that, both because i don’t know the reason for this separate piece of wood > and because I’m a little worried that replacing it with a thinner piece > would weaken the floor there. > I’d already pulled up about 60 square feet of the parquet, so (kicking > myself for doing unnecessary work before pulling up the carpet) I’m > thinking of putting down a thin layer of plywood to replace the parquet I > pulled up, and then installing the laminate over the entire thing: the > parquet, that mysterious piece of plywood by the glass door, and my > replacement layer. > Thoughts? > — > Terry Carroll        | > Santa Clara, CA      |   "The parties are advised to chill." > Modell delendus est  |         no. 98-56577 (9th Cir. July 24, 2002)

Response:

> 1. The patch by the slider is probably where somebody had an oopsie, and > trashed some of the parquet floor, or they needed to get at something > under the floor and didn’t have access from below. The question is > what is below the patch- the real plywood subfloor, or air and > joists? Can you se it from below?

I went down into the crawl space this morning and found: just air and joists.  Now I’m really reluctant to replace it. > 2. If the patch is higher than the surrounding parquet, the bump may > telegraph thru the laminate, or cause joint problems.

The existing patch (by the slide) seems perfectly level — kind of surprising, since it’s essentially a raised subfloor, whose top is level with the parquet tile.  My only concern is getting my new field level as well. > The parquet isn’t glued directly to the plywood. is it? It should have > been put down over felt or resin paper. Unless a slob installed it, > removal shouldn’t be THAT hard…

Yeah, it’s glued directly to the subfloor — no felt ot resin paper.   > Another reason to strip entire floor is to avoid having to deal with the > humps at doorways and floor transitions.

There’s only a single transition (4-foot wide, where the room meets the tiled entryway), so I have to deal with that anyway. >4. IMHO, anything but laminate-

No, we’ve done our due diligence and made our decision there, and already purchased the laminate.   That part’s not up for revisiting. Thanks for your help on this. — Terry Carroll        |   Santa Clara, CA      |   "The parties are advised to chill." Modell delendus est  |         no. 98-56577 (9th Cir. July 24, 2002)

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Is it okay to install laminate flooring (like Pergo) on top of a wood > parquet tile floor (with the foam underlayment over the parquet, of > course), rather than removing the parquet first? > Here’s my situation.  I have a 350 sq. ft. room that is about 70% carpet, > 30% parquet.  I was planning to pull up the carpet and the parquet and > install laminate flooring (the brand is Columbia Clic, a glueless > laminate) onto the plywood floor beneath. > When I pulled up the carpet, I got two surprises. > First, the carpet was installed over the parquet.  I’d figured that the > carpet was over the plywood.  I’ll admit, a major part of my wanting to > install right over the parquet is laziness — I don’t want to pull up that > much tile. > But there’s another thing: in an approximately 5 ft. x 2 1/2 ft. area in > front of a sliding glass door, there is no parquet.  Instead, there’s a > piece of plywood.  It looks like the plywood is thicker than the parquet > tile, and fits into a cutting of the plywood floor.  If I pull the > parquet, I’ll have to get this piece of plywood out, too, and replace it > with another piece that’s about 1/4 inch thinner.  I’m reluctant to do > that, both because i don’t know the reason for this separate piece of wood > and because I’m a little worried that replacing it with a thinner piece > would weaken the floor there. > I’d already pulled up about 60 square feet of the parquet, so (kicking > myself for doing unnecessary work before pulling up the carpet) I’m > thinking of putting down a thin layer of plywood to replace the parquet I > pulled up, and then installing the laminate over the entire thing: the > parquet, that mysterious piece of plywood by the glass door, and my > replacement layer. > Thoughts? > — > Terry Carroll        | > Santa Clara, CA      |   "The parties are advised to chill." > Modell delendus est  |         no. 98-56577 (9th Cir. July 24, 2002)

I would do as you suggest. I see nothing wrong with it as long as you are laying on a flush surface.

Response:

Is it okay to install laminate flooring (like Pergo) on top of a wood parquet tile floor (with the foam underlayment over the parquet, of course), rather than removing the parquet first? Here’s my situation.  I have a 350 sq. ft. room that is about 70% carpet, 30% parquet.  I was planning to pull up the carpet and the parquet and install laminate flooring (the brand is Columbia Clic, a glueless laminate) onto the plywood floor beneath. When I pulled up the carpet, I got two surprises. First, the carpet was installed over the parquet.  I’d figured that the carpet was over the plywood.  I’ll admit, a major part of my wanting to install right over the parquet is laziness — I don’t want to pull up that much tile. But there’s another thing: in an approximately 5 ft. x 2 1/2 ft. area in front of a sliding glass door, there is no parquet.  Instead, there’s a piece of plywood.  It looks like the plywood is thicker than the parquet tile, and fits into a cutting of the plywood floor.  If I pull the parquet, I’ll have to get this piece of plywood out, too, and replace it with another piece that’s about 1/4 inch thinner.  I’m reluctant to do that, both because i don’t know the reason for this separate piece of wood and because I’m a little worried that replacing it with a thinner piece would weaken the floor there. I’d already pulled up about 60 square feet of the parquet, so (kicking myself for doing unnecessary work before pulling up the carpet) I’m thinking of putting down a thin layer of plywood to replace the parquet I pulled up, and then installing the laminate over the entire thing: the parquet, that mysterious piece of plywood by the glass door, and my replacement layer. Thoughts? — Terry Carroll        |   Santa Clara, CA      |   "The parties are advised to chill." Modell delendus est  |         no. 98-56577 (9th Cir. July 24, 2002)

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Is it okay to install laminate flooring (like Pergo) on top of a wood > parquet tile floor (with the foam underlayment over the parquet, of > course), rather than removing the parquet first? > Here’s my situation.  I have a 350 sq. ft. room that is about 70% carpet, > 30% parquet.  I was planning to pull up the carpet and the parquet and > install laminate flooring (the brand is Columbia Clic, a glueless > laminate) onto the plywood floor beneath. > When I pulled up the carpet, I got two surprises. > First, the carpet was installed over the parquet.  I’d figured that the > carpet was over the plywood.  I’ll admit, a major part of my wanting to > install right over the parquet is laziness — I don’t want to pull up that > much tile. > But there’s another thing: in an approximately 5 ft. x 2 1/2 ft. area in > front of a sliding glass door, there is no parquet.  Instead, there’s a > piece of plywood.  It looks like the plywood is thicker than the parquet > tile, and fits into a cutting of the plywood floor.  If I pull the > parquet, I’ll have to get this piece of plywood out, too, and replace it > with another piece that’s about 1/4 inch thinner.  I’m reluctant to do > that, both because i don’t know the reason for this separate piece of wood > and because I’m a little worried that replacing it with a thinner piece > would weaken the floor there. > I’d already pulled up about 60 square feet of the parquet, so (kicking > myself for doing unnecessary work before pulling up the carpet) I’m > thinking of putting down a thin layer of plywood to replace the parquet I > pulled up, and then installing the laminate over the entire thing: the > parquet, that mysterious piece of plywood by the glass door, and my > replacement layer. > Thoughts?

1. The patch by the slider is probably where somebody had an oopsie, and trashed some of the parquet floor, or they needed to get at something under the floor and didn’t have access from below. The question is what is below the patch- the real plywood subfloor, or air and joists? Can you se it from below? 2. If the patch is higher than the surrounding parquet, the bump may telegraph thru the laminate, or cause joint problems. The thin foam doesn’t work like carpet pad- it is mainly so the floating laminate can slide around with temp changes. You need the floor to be level, and free of squeeks and mushy spots. Laminate will highlight any peaks or valleys, since it is so thin and shiny. You need to pull the patch, and replace with something thinner. There is <probably> another layer of plywood underneath. 3. At this point, floor is such a mess, I would pull it all up down to the plywood, just so I could look for mushy spots and bad nailing, and patch in as needed. And depending on the the type of subfloor recommended by the maker of the laminate, and how thick it is, you may need to put down a layer of chipboard, to get the floor smooth and the height correct. The parquet isn’t glued directly to the plywood. is it? It should have been put down over felt or resin paper. Unless a slob installed it, removal shouldn’t be THAT hard, since you won’t be trying to save it for reuse. Another reason to strip entire floor is to avoid having to deal with the humps at doorways and floor transitions. Any shortcuts you take now, you may have to live with for years. Better to do it right the first time, and never have to worry about it again. 4. IMHO, anything but laminate- I haven’t seen any that didn’t look like what it is- a picture of wood. (Or do they now make laminate with a layer of real wood on top?)  If you do all the prep work and present them with a clean solid subfloor, pull the baseboard, etc, having a pro put down prefinish hardwood might be less expensive than you think. But if you like having a giant kitchen counter in your living room- different people have different tastes, I guess. aem sends….

Response:

>I would do as you suggest. I see nothing wrong with it as long as you are >laying on a flush surface.

Thanks.  I’m still undecided, but I’m leaning that way. — Terry Carroll        |   Santa Clara, CA      |   "The parties are advised to chill." Modell delendus est  |         no. 98-56577 (9th Cir. July 24, 2002)

Response:

Yes you can put it over top of the parquet.   If the floor is solid and not squeeking all over the place, you can focus on getting it pretty level and do your install. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – > Is it okay to install laminate flooring (like Pergo) on top of a wood > parquet tile floor (with the foam underlayment over the parquet, of > course), rather than removing the parquet first? > Here’s my situation.  I have a 350 sq. ft. room that is about 70% carpet, > 30% parquet.  I was planning to pull up the carpet and the parquet and > install laminate flooring (the brand is Columbia Clic, a glueless > laminate) onto the plywood floor beneath. > When I pulled up the carpet, I got two surprises. > First, the carpet was installed over the parquet.  I’d figured that the > carpet was over the plywood.  I’ll admit, a major part of my wanting to > install right over the parquet is laziness — I don’t want to pull up that > much tile. > But there’s another thing: in an approximately 5 ft. x 2 1/2 ft. area in > front of a sliding glass door, there is no parquet.  Instead, there’s a > piece of plywood.  It looks like the plywood is thicker than the parquet > tile, and fits into a cutting of the plywood floor.  If I pull the > parquet, I’ll have to get this piece of plywood out, too, and replace it > with another piece that’s about 1/4 inch thinner.  I’m reluctant to do > that, both because i don’t know the reason for this separate piece of wood > and because I’m a little worried that replacing it with a thinner piece > would weaken the floor there. > I’d already pulled up about 60 square feet of the parquet, so (kicking > myself for doing unnecessary work before pulling up the carpet) I’m > thinking of putting down a thin layer of plywood to replace the parquet I > pulled up, and then installing the laminate over the entire thing: the > parquet, that mysterious piece of plywood by the glass door, and my > replacement layer. > Thoughts? > — > Terry Carroll        | > Santa Clara, CA      |   "The parties are advised to chill." > Modell delendus est  |         no. 98-56577 (9th Cir. July 24, 2002)

Response:

> 1. The patch by the slider is probably where somebody had an oopsie, and > trashed some of the parquet floor, or they needed to get at something > under the floor and didn’t have access from below. The question is > what is below the patch- the real plywood subfloor, or air and > joists? Can you se it from below?

I went down into the crawl space this morning and found: just air and joists.  Now I’m really reluctant to replace it. > 2. If the patch is higher than the surrounding parquet, the bump may > telegraph thru the laminate, or cause joint problems.

The existing patch (by the slide) seems perfectly level — kind of surprising, since it’s essentially a raised subfloor, whose top is level with the parquet tile.  My only concern is getting my new field level as well. > The parquet isn’t glued directly to the plywood. is it? It should have > been put down over felt or resin paper. Unless a slob installed it, > removal shouldn’t be THAT hard…

Yeah, it’s glued directly to the subfloor — no felt ot resin paper.   > Another reason to strip entire floor is to avoid having to deal with the > humps at doorways and floor transitions.

There’s only a single transition (4-foot wide, where the room meets the tiled entryway), so I have to deal with that anyway. >4. IMHO, anything but laminate-

No, we’ve done our due diligence and made our decision there, and already purchased the laminate.   That part’s not up for revisiting. Thanks for your help on this. — Terry Carroll        |   Santa Clara, CA      |   "The parties are advised to chill." Modell delendus est  |         no. 98-56577 (9th Cir. July 24, 2002)

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Is it okay to install laminate flooring (like Pergo) on top of a wood > parquet tile floor (with the foam underlayment over the parquet, of > course), rather than removing the parquet first? > Here’s my situation.  I have a 350 sq. ft. room that is about 70% carpet, > 30% parquet.  I was planning to pull up the carpet and the parquet and > install laminate flooring (the brand is Columbia Clic, a glueless > laminate) onto the plywood floor beneath. > When I pulled up the carpet, I got two surprises. > First, the carpet was installed over the parquet.  I’d figured that the > carpet was over the plywood.  I’ll admit, a major part of my wanting to > install right over the parquet is laziness — I don’t want to pull up that > much tile. > But there’s another thing: in an approximately 5 ft. x 2 1/2 ft. area in > front of a sliding glass door, there is no parquet.  Instead, there’s a > piece of plywood.  It looks like the plywood is thicker than the parquet > tile, and fits into a cutting of the plywood floor.  If I pull the > parquet, I’ll have to get this piece of plywood out, too, and replace it > with another piece that’s about 1/4 inch thinner.  I’m reluctant to do > that, both because i don’t know the reason for this separate piece of wood > and because I’m a little worried that replacing it with a thinner piece > would weaken the floor there. > I’d already pulled up about 60 square feet of the parquet, so (kicking > myself for doing unnecessary work before pulling up the carpet) I’m > thinking of putting down a thin layer of plywood to replace the parquet I > pulled up, and then installing the laminate over the entire thing: the > parquet, that mysterious piece of plywood by the glass door, and my > replacement layer. > Thoughts? > — > Terry Carroll        | > Santa Clara, CA      |   "The parties are advised to chill." > Modell delendus est  |         no. 98-56577 (9th Cir. July 24, 2002)

I would do as you suggest. I see nothing wrong with it as long as you are laying on a flush surface.

Response:

Question:

Recently in a thread on laminate flooring tile, Jeanne P. spoke highly of her experience with Mannington sheet vinyl, which I take it is what Mannington calls its resilient flooring.  That interested us in the product and we are seriously considering it now.  We would be interested in experiences or comments of any other folks on this group. Thank you. AB I don’t know about laminate tiles, but we got a Mannington sheet vinyl floor in our kitchen area. It’s adjacent to the ceramic tiled floor in the foyer, and another ceramic tiled floor in the mudroom (small room between the garage and kitchen). We are quite pleased with it and heartily recommend it to anyone. Unless someone has the same kind of Mannington floor at home, everyone thinks it’s ceramic until we tell them otherwise. It’s great to have in the kitchen, and we find it much kinder on our feet than the ceramic. DH keeps saying we should have installed the same flooring in the foyer, because his feet really notice the difference (he works from home). Perhaps you can consider Mannington sheet vinyl as an option. We got the gold series, and have had it for just over a year. Jeanne P

Response:

: Recently in a thread on laminate flooring tile, Jeanne P. spoke highly : of her experience with Mannington sheet vinyl, which I take it is what : Mannington calls its resilient flooring.  That interested us in the : product and we are seriously considering it now.  We would be : interested in experiences or comments of any other folks on this : group. : : Thank you. : : AB The gold series had a problem at one time…shrinkage…i know they did not warranty their work on the gold series, unless it was installed by an Authorized Installer…if you do get the Mannington, make sure to ask the retailer, if the installers are Authorized by Mannington to install…some are not, and still sub-contracted to, by the retailers… chip : : : : I don’t know about laminate tiles, but we got a Mannington sheet vinyl : floor in our kitchen area. It’s adjacent to the ceramic tiled floor : in the foyer, and another ceramic tiled floor in the mudroom (small : room between the garage and kitchen). We are quite pleased with it : and heartily recommend it to anyone. Unless someone has the same kind : of Mannington floor at home, everyone thinks it’s ceramic until we : tell them otherwise. It’s great to have in the kitchen, and we find : it much kinder on our feet than the ceramic. DH keeps saying we should : have installed the same flooring in the foyer, because his feet : really notice the difference (he works from home). Perhaps you can : consider Mannington sheet vinyl as an option. We got the gold series, : and have had it for just over a year. : : Jeanne P

Response:

>The gold series had a problem at one time…shrinkage…i know they did not >warranty their work on the gold series, unless it was installed by an >Authorized Installer…if you do get the Mannington, make sure to ask the >retailer, if the installers are Authorized by Mannington to install…some >are not, and still sub-contracted to, by the retailers…

Thank you, Chip. Good information.  Yesterday the salesman at the authorized Mannington retailer admitted immediately that there had been a shrinkage problem, but he said 12 years ago when they were experimenting with some different bases.  He claimed that they had discontinued use of the problem base and that there are no problems now.  In any event, they will do the installation, including the subfloor, and take sole responsibility. Alfred

Response:

Question:

: I have been considering laminate floor tile instead of real ceramic in : the foyer straight back to and including the kitchen. Looking at : products by Alloc and Mannington. Any do’s or don’ts on this product? : Will have it professionally installed if I decide to go with it. Or : should I stick with ceramic and forget the laminate? Can’t seem to find : any real user advice except from suppliers. We laid out and installed "tile" from the Formica Ceramix Collection over the well-worm 30-year-old original vinyl tile squares. It went down in the family room and kitchen areas (about 400 sqft). The floor base is a concrete slab. We followed the directions on the packaging to the "T" and used glue in the "quick lock" joints throughout the kitchen area and other places where water / liquid spills might be an issue. We also went a step further and created an additional water barrier around the perimeter of the flooring by using Silicon III to keep any water leaks from a dish washer and laundry from being able to flow under the plastic barrier or into the "exposed" sides of the laminate’s substrate. The biggest "issue" we had was in drawing the layout before doing the actual install so we were able to reduce waste as much as possible when cutting and fitting the "tiles" to match and line up across the full run of the area — it had to be worked around the existing cabinets and openings and "mini-wall" that intruded into the area. (BTW,  Formica Corp is in *reorganization* (Chpt 7) _NOT_ full-blown bankruptcy.) — Steve www.ApacheTrail.com/house Mesa, AZ

Response:

> I have been considering laminate floor tile instead of real ceramic in > the foyer straight back to and including the kitchen. Looking at > products by Alloc and Mannington. Any do’s or don’ts on this product? > Will have it professionally installed if I decide to go with it. Or > should I stick with ceramic and forget the laminate? Can’t seem to find > any real user advice except from suppliers.

I don’t know about laminate tiles, but we got a Mannington sheet vinyl floor in our kitchen area. It’s adjacent to the ceramic tiled floor in the foyer, and another ceramic tiled floor in the mudroom (small room between the garage and kitchen). We are quite pleased with it and heartily recommend it to anyone. Unless someone has the same kind of Mannington floor at home, everyone thinks it’s ceramic until we tell them otherwise. It’s great to have in the kitchen, and we find it much kinder on our feet than the ceramic. DH keeps saying we should have installed the same flooring in the foyer, because his feet really notice the difference (he works from home). Perhaps you can consider Mannington sheet vinyl as an option. We got the gold series, and have had it for just over a year. Jeanne P

Response:

Ahhhhh….  My bad. I’m familiar with the floating floor *hardwood-like* strips but not the tiles… I suspect the material is similiar, my partner did his entire first floor with the strips, used Armstrong and is thrilled with it… Keep in mind the tidbit about installation guarantee I mentioned before. Wish I had more info for you regarding the tiles… – Bill Fact: A for sale by owner home sells every 30 seconds. Make it happen…  Be seen, get sold at propertySites. http://www.propertysites.com/ – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> I have had very good luck with laminate tile in the past…  However, don’t > skimp on the tile, the cheaper ones use cheaper glue – this will be a big > problem in high traffic areas such as the foyer.  With the cheaper glue, the > tiles can *slide* and when that happens, you’ll wish you stuck with ceramic > tile. > We must be talking about two different laminate tiles.  The style I am > looking at is a free floating floor. No adhesive.

Response:

: I have been considering laminate floor tile instead of real ceramic in : the foyer straight back to and including the kitchen. Looking at : products by Alloc and Mannington. Any do’s or don’ts on this product? : Will have it professionally installed if I decide to go with it. Or : should I stick with ceramic and forget the laminate? Can’t seem to find : any real user advice except from suppliers. Do get the glue type since it would be considered a *wet* area… Dont get the snap lock, unless it is approved for a *wet* area… chip

Response:

> I have had very good luck with laminate tile in the past…  However, don’t > skimp on the tile, the cheaper ones use cheaper glue – this will be a big > problem in high traffic areas such as the foyer.  With the cheaper glue, the > tiles can *slide* and when that happens, you’ll wish you stuck with ceramic > tile.

We must be talking about two different laminate tiles.  The style I am looking at is a free floating floor. No adhesive.

Response:

I have been considering laminate floor tile instead of real ceramic in the foyer straight back to and including the kitchen. Looking at products by Alloc and Mannington. Any do’s or don’ts on this product? Will have it professionally installed if I decide to go with it. Or should I stick with ceramic and forget the laminate? Can’t seem to find any real user advice except from suppliers.

Response:

I have had very good luck with laminate tile in the past…  However, don’t skimp on the tile, the cheaper ones use cheaper glue – this will be a big problem in high traffic areas such as the foyer.  With the cheaper glue, the tiles can *slide* and when that happens, you’ll wish you stuck with ceramic tile. Also, make sure the subfloor is well preped and dust free, and if you’re covering existing laminate or vinyl flooring it is usually recommended to get the tile with the *best* adhesive as to prevent sliding. We’ve used only laminate tiles in my folks kitchen for the past 30 years and replaced the floor twice and that was due to color changes, the tile was fine, put one layer right on top of the existing – best adhesive… Since you’re having it professionally installed see if they’ll guarantee the labor, there’s a flooring place here in MD that guarantees installation on all floors for the life of the flooring… – Bill Fact: A for sale by owner home sells every 30 seconds. Make it happen…  Be seen, get sold at propertySites. http://www.propertysites.com/ – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – > I have been considering laminate floor tile instead of real ceramic in > the foyer straight back to and including the kitchen. Looking at > products by Alloc and Mannington. Any do’s or don’ts on this product? > Will have it professionally installed if I decide to go with it. Or > should I stick with ceramic and forget the laminate? Can’t seem to find > any real user advice except from suppliers.

Response:

Question:

!

: Does laminate flooring resist water damage?  I would like : to put it in a basement but we have very occasional water : on the floor in one corner and I was wondering if the laminate : would be damaged by it.  We are hoping to fix this problem : before a floor is installed but would like to know what would : happen in the event our "fix" doesn’t work! : : Cathy. It took me a week or so to solve my leaky fridge problem – plenty of time for the small amount of water that was periodically dripping onto the floor (and never sat for more than a couple of hours before being discovered and wiped up) to permanently damage my floor – the laminate’s separating in uneven little clumps from the particle board.   I vote "no" to doing your basement in laminate! Sprucedale :

Response:

Does laminate flooring resist water damage?  I would like to put it in a basement but we have very occasional water on the floor in one corner and I was wondering if the laminate would be damaged by it.  We are hoping to fix this problem before a floor is installed but would like to know what would happen in the event our "fix" doesn’t work! Cathy.

Response:

> Does laminate flooring resist water damage?

No. > I would like to put it in a basement

Violates the warranty on most laminate flooring > but we have very occasional water > on the floor in one corner and I was wondering if the laminate > would be damaged by it.  

Yes. > before a floor is installed but would like to know what would > happen in the event our "fix" doesn’t work!

Same as with any manufactured wood product — it will swell, buckle, delaminate, warp, and ruin. If you are doing a floor below grade, do something that won’t ruin if it gets wet, such as, e.g., indoor-outdoor carpet, tile, or even textured concrete (look it up, there’s a technique for pouring a dyed texture layer and stamping a pattern on it to make it look like stone that looks surprisingly good).  Even the versions of laminate supposedly warrantied for below-grade use will swell and bubble and delaminate if exposed to water from below.  In my opinion, putting wood *anything* below grade is idiocy — and laminate is basically wood particleboard with a photo and wear layer on top. —     GnuPG public key at http://badtux.org/eric/eric.gpg

Response:

Question:

> >erber may not be a good idea if you have a dog or a cat, as their >claws tend to snag in it. >   there   are   tighter   twist  berbers   out   there , to   take   the   > abuse  of  pets  claws .   Just  dont  bye   a  wide  loop  beber   with  pets >  .   Any   associate  or  salesperson  who   sell s carpet will , or  should > ask  you  if  you have  any  pets ,l what type  of  rooms   there  going in. > Is  it  a  high  traffic area         ect.

True, but don’t count on this level of service or expertise at Home Depot. — Chris Green

Response:

  Disagree     ive  went  to  carpet  stores  and    didnt get  expert advice ,  where  at  h/d  the   associate  was    nowledgeable about  price and  fibers.   and   there  not  comm  salespeople .  seem   to  know  there  product . These employee get plenty  procduct knowledge  from  the   vendors  of carpet co.  and   the   cabinet associates   know  there   stuff  also.>True, but don’t count on this level of service or expertise at Home Depot.

Response:

>Unfortunately, low price over > good quality tends to be a driving factor for many US consumers. A > good (wool as an example) berber rug can last for generations, and is > priced accordingly.

But I don’t have any kids.  Why should I care what happens to my rug after I die? That bit of humor aside, I’d *love* a good wool rug.  I’m seriously considering it when I replace the worn, cheap, pink wall-to-wall that came with my house (and is covering up some lovely old red oak flooring). Sorry this is digressing from the OP’s question. Cindy Hamilton

Response:

Thanks for all the helpful responses. I like something that will not stain and can be cleaned without much trouble. Durability is not an issue, as the kids are gone and we may sell the house in about 5 years… So, it looks like plastic berber may be OK if we find a stile we like. and yes, of course it was $22 per square yard.. Reinaldo – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> I would like to replace my basement carpet. > Home Depot has barber types from $14 to $22 per sq feet, installed. > Are these any good? what should I look for? > Should I go to a carpet store instead? > Thanks! > Reinaldo > Per square foot? Man, it better be Cashmere for $14 to $22 per square > foot! > More likely it was per square yard, and this is pretty cheap carpet. > Look to the warranty: better carpets have longer warranties; anything > that looks and feels good to you and has at least a 10-year warranty > is quite reasonable at $14 to $22 per square yard. > Wool Berber is a luxury carpet; synthetic Berber is, well, a cheap > imitation of a luxury carpet. It it’s a well-made cheap imitation, > this is not a bad thing. > Berber may not be a good idea if you have a dog or a cat, as their > claws tend to snag in it. > — > Chris Green

Response:

(Also off-topic) If you have hardwood flooring, then (IMHO) you can have the best of both worlds; a classic layout in a room is to have a large area rug in the center, leaving about 2′ or so of exposed hardwood around the edges. Another option is to have several rugs, leaving wood areas exposed. In every house I have owned I would rip out the wall-wall, install hardwood (myself), and decorate as described above. (You can install select/better oak hw for the same price as cheap wall-wall, about $15/yard if you DIY). Area rugs go with you when you move to another house, and thus one can justify (or at least I do) very high quality rugs that will last a lifetime. (Very off-topic) We too don’t have any kids, nor will we. This situation does not reduce our appreciation and enjoyment of things that are both high quality, and made to last. I hope the non-profit organizations we will donate all our possessions to will appreciate (i.e. get a good price for) them. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->Unfortunately, low price over > good quality tends to be a driving factor for many US consumers. A > good (wool as an example) berber rug can last for generations, and is > priced accordingly. > But I don’t have any kids.  Why should I care what happens to my rug > after I die? > That bit of humor aside, I’d *love* a good wool rug.  I’m seriously considering > it when I replace the worn, cheap, pink wall-to-wall that came with my house > (and is covering up some lovely old red oak flooring). > Sorry this is digressing from the OP’s question. > Cindy Hamilton

Response:

>Unfortunately, low price over > good quality tends to be a driving factor for many US consumers. A > good (wool as an example) berber rug can last for generations, and is > priced accordingly. > But I don’t have any kids.  Why should I care what happens to my rug > after I die? > That bit of humor aside, I’d *love* a good wool rug.  I’m seriously considering > it when I replace the worn, cheap, pink wall-to-wall that came with my house > (and is covering up some lovely old red oak flooring).

moths? crickets? – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Sorry this is digressing from the OP’s question. > Cindy Hamilton

Response:

>erber may not be a good idea if you have a dog or a cat, as their >claws tend to snag in it.

  there   are   tighter   twist  berbers   out   there , to   take   the   abuse  of  pets  claws .   Just  dont  bye   a  wide  loop  beber   with  pets  .   Any   associate  or  salesperson  who   sell s carpet will , or  should ask  you  if  you have  any  pets ,l what type  of  rooms   there  going in. Is  it  a  high  traffic area         ect.

Response:

     a   wool   berber   rug.     i  have   not  seen   one   of   these   yet .      i  have  seen  area  5   x8   rugs   that  are  wool  priced  above   and  beyond  500.00    and  up . i  could   imagine  if were  wall   to  wall for  a  basement wow!  

Response:

 >Well…. personally, I would go elsewhere and look for something other than >Berber.  That seems like a fairly high price for used pop bottles. >"Berber" is just a fancy marketing name to make recylced pop bottles seem

  thats  one  type  of  berber.   there  are  nylon  berbers  there   are olifiyln  , polypropolyn ,  which  your  refefering to  as   plastic> >Berber.  That seems like a fairly high price for used pop bottles.

   he  is  referring  to   sy    price.  If   it  were  22.00  a  sf  it   would  be   198.00  a  sy .  da.    this  is   not  beverly  hills.

Response:

I would like to replace my basement carpet. Home Depot has barber types from $14 to $22 per sq feet, installed. Are these any good? what should I look for? Should I go to a carpet store instead? Thanks! Reinaldo

Response:

I hope those are actually square YARD prices.  And it’s berber carpet. Here in WI, HD is pretty expensive and the market is pretty competitive.  I would at least check out someone else to see if you think HD is giving you good value. JK – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – > I would like to replace my basement carpet. > Home Depot has barber types from $14 to $22 per sq feet, installed. > Are these any good? what should I look for? > Should I go to a carpet store instead? > Thanks! > Reinaldo

Response:

Well…. personally, I would go elsewhere and look for something other than Berber.  That seems like a fairly high price for used pop bottles. "Berber" is just a fancy marketing name to make recylced pop bottles seem elegant. (The carpet is made of spun fibers of polypropolene plastic — the same plastic used for throw away bottles.  It’s a soft plastic — and Berber carpets are notorious for showing the burn marks from the friction of furniture being dragged over them. NOVA produced a program on PBS some while back in which they explored how many products we use each day are made from yesterday’s refuse — polyprop’ is one of those plastics that has found many new uses — particularly in the building industry — and there’s a lot of it "out there" simply ‘cuz it lasts forever in landfills.  Recycling is great and necessary, but I don’t want a carpet made of my old Dr Pepper bottles. — Steve www.ApacheTrail.com/house Mesa, AZ

: I would like to replace my basement carpet. : Home Depot has barber types from $14 to $22 per sq feet, installed. : Are these any good? what should I look for? : Should I go to a carpet store instead? : : Thanks! : : Reinaldo

Response:

Hmm…. Not even close. Berber – A term that originally referred to the traditional handweaving of North African tribespeople who used handspun yarns made from undyed wool of local sheep. The following types of berber rugs are commonly available throughout the US:  –Wool  –Nylon  –Olefin  –Nylon-olefin blend. Many berbers are multilevel loops. Multilevel loops have many advantages over level loops and offer pattern and random effects. These styles range from casual to ultra-elegant. Polypropylene is very inexpensive (but doesn’t stain easily) and is only one of many materials used to make a rug. There are ‘fake’ materials everywhere; laminate flooring, vinyl siding, plastic wood moldings, rugs etc. An ‘oriental rug’ can be made of virtually anything, though traditionally they are wool and/or silk. Shopping at places like HD, Lowes etc. give many people the perception that an oriental rug, (or berber, as the case is here), is only made of synthetic (inexpensive) materials. Unfortunately, low price over good quality tends to be a driving factor for many US consumers. A good (wool as an example) berber rug can last for generations, and is priced accordingly. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – > Well…. personally, I would go elsewhere and look for something other than > Berber.  That seems like a fairly high price for used pop bottles. > "Berber" is just a fancy marketing name to make recylced pop bottles seem > elegant. (The carpet is made of spun fibers of polypropolene plastic — the > same plastic used for throw away bottles.  It’s a soft plastic — and Berber > carpets are notorious for showing the burn marks from the friction of > furniture being dragged over them. > NOVA produced a program on PBS some while back in which they explored how > many products we use each day are made from yesterday’s refuse — polyprop’ > is one of those plastics that has found many new uses — particularly in the > building industry — and there’s a lot of it "out there" simply ‘cuz it > lasts forever in landfills.  Recycling is great and necessary, but I don’t > want a carpet made of my old Dr Pepper bottles. > — > Steve > www.ApacheTrail.com/house > Mesa, AZ > : I would like to replace my basement carpet. > : Home Depot has barber types from $14 to $22 per sq feet, installed. > : Are these any good? what should I look for? > : Should I go to a carpet store instead? > : > : Thanks! > : > : Reinaldo

Response:

> I would like to replace my basement carpet. > Home Depot has barber types from $14 to $22 per sq feet, installed. > Are these any good? what should I look for? > Should I go to a carpet store instead? > Thanks! > Reinaldo

Per square foot? Man, it better be Cashmere for $14 to $22 per square foot! More likely it was per square yard, and this is pretty cheap carpet. Look to the warranty: better carpets have longer warranties; anything that looks and feels good to you and has at least a 10-year warranty is quite reasonable at $14 to $22 per square yard. Wool Berber is a luxury carpet; synthetic Berber is, well, a cheap imitation of a luxury carpet. It it’s a well-made cheap imitation, this is not a bad thing. Berber may not be a good idea if you have a dog or a cat, as their claws tend to snag in it. — Chris Green

Response:

Question:

…..snip > Here is your chance to vote: Should I level it and why? > Thanks again,

As I mentioned previously, the underlayment will compensate for the 1/16th variation. When I installed my Formica — which I prefer to Pergo — my floor had similar ridges; two years later the floor looks as good as it did on day one.  Now ripples, no heaving, no joint separations. But rather than waste time debating it, just go ahead and scrape the floor and you’ll be able to get started sooner than it seems it will take with anguishing over this concern  :-)

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – > …..snip > Here is your chance to vote: Should I level it and why? > Thanks again, > As I mentioned previously, the underlayment will compensate for the > 1/16th > variation. When I installed my Formica — which I prefer to Pergo — my > floor had similar ridges; two years later the floor looks as good as it > did > on day one.  Now ripples, no heaving, no joint separations. But rather > than > waste time debating it, just go ahead and scrape the floor and you’ll be > able to get started sooner than it seems it will take with anguishing > over > this concern  :-)

1/16th should be no problem at all… You could use the better underlament ( silent step) it helps with noise and imperfections in the sub-floor.  the only problem I  see is the underlament sticking to the glue residue, and possibly making noise when walked on. — Master Pergo Installer/Armstrong Certified Carpet/Vinyl/Hardwood/Ceramic/Laminate/VCT/PVC

Response:

Thanks folks.  We hammered some more of it into oblivion today.  The extent of the irregularities is the height of the glue under the space under the tile as defined by its feet. Looks like about 1/16th of an inch. Sometimes this glue came off with the tile, but mostly it stayed on the plywood.  It is somewhat pliable and if I can finally find my putty knife I could see how easily I could peel it off.  There is a lot of it though. The flooring will be Pergo Presto.  It says in the Subfloor Preparation requirements: "Your subfloor must be clean dry and flat….Any low spots greater than 3/16 of an inch must be filled in with a portland cement based leveling compound. Any ridges on the floor must be removed." So they want it flat without ridges.  My ridges are 1/16th inch tops.  Sure looks like ridges to me by my eye.  Feels like it by my hand.  It ain’t no 3/16 inch however.  I don’t want to end up feeling it in my bare feet later. Here is your chance to vote: Should I level it and why? Thanks again, Tomes (remove X from address to post)

: I agree with David but your interpretation of "light" irregularities and : mine or Davids may vary widely…If you’re not sure, fill the irregularities : with a Latex leveling compound/Filler then proceed to install the flooring : with confidence.  This is the same stuff installers use when laying new : vinyl over 3/16 plywood to fill and smooth the seams. : : It’s fast and easy. : : Alex : :

: > OK, so my wife and daughter are pounding away at the tile floor in the : foyer : > with a sledge hammer (with goggles and facemasks) and piling the pieces in : > bags.  "I just don’t like this anymore, it is too dark."  So I suppose I : am : > now on my way to installing a laminate flooring of her choice.  I will : > likely be stopping in here with questions along the way, and here is my : > first one: : > : > The tiles seem to come up from the plywood floor underneath easily enough : > once broken and jarred loose by the pounding (which is actually quite fun : > when one actually starts to get into it).  Now we have these vast areas : > where the glue remains stuck to the plywood.  It is pretty uniform across : > the area in lines.  Do we need to remove this glue or can the new floor go : > over it?  If we need to remove it how is this done? : > — : > Starting another project into the unknown……, : > Tomes : > (remove X from address to post) : > : > : :

Response:

Most of the laminates are the floating floor type so you would need a smooth flat surface to lay it on your choices are this you could cut out and remove the plywood floor from that area, use a scraper to get rid of the old thinset,  add a piece of thin plywood to get a smooth surface, they do make a mat to go under the floating floor the thicker one of these might be thick enough to go over you ridges. buy a small piece of the thicker cushioning material and see how it lays.  You don’t want waves or bumps in your floor. Wayne

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> OK, so my wife and daughter are pounding away at the tile floor in the foyer > with a sledge hammer (with goggles and facemasks) and piling the pieces in > bags.  "I just don’t like this anymore, it is too dark."  So I suppose I am > now on my way to installing a laminate flooring of her choice.  I will > likely be stopping in here with questions along the way, and here is my > first one: > The tiles seem to come up from the plywood floor underneath easily enough > once broken and jarred loose by the pounding (which is actually quite fun > when one actually starts to get into it).  Now we have these vast areas > where the glue remains stuck to the plywood.  It is pretty uniform across > the area in lines.  Do we need to remove this glue or can the new floor go > over it?  If we need to remove it how is this done? > — > Starting another project into the unknown…… > Tomes > (remove X from address to post)

Response:

OK, so my wife and daughter are pounding away at the tile floor in the foyer with a sledge hammer (with goggles and facemasks) and piling the pieces in bags.  "I just don’t like this anymore, it is too dark."  So I suppose I am now on my way to installing a laminate flooring of her choice.  I will likely be stopping in here with questions along the way, and here is my first one: The tiles seem to come up from the plywood floor underneath easily enough once broken and jarred loose by the pounding (which is actually quite fun when one actually starts to get into it).  Now we have these vast areas where the glue remains stuck to the plywood.  It is pretty uniform across the area in lines.  Do we need to remove this glue or can the new floor go over it?  If we need to remove it how is this done? — Starting another project into the unknown…… Tomes (remove X from address to post)

Response:

   one   problem  i   could   imagin  with the presto  ,                  would be   the    end  of   the             plank  landing  on  the edge of the mortor , which would   give   you   a  unlevel  plank, giving   you   a clicking  sound , and   eventully     it   time   would   give  you   a  weak or    or  gaping  joint .   Pergo   is  forgiving   on   the   slope    up   to   1/8    for      i  think     a  ten   ft   span   .  i   would   not       chance   it.     Sand   or    feather   out   the   glue   or     mortor.      

Response:

I agree with David but your interpretation of "light" irregularities and mine or Davids may vary widely…If you’re not sure, fill the irregularities with a Latex leveling compound/Filler then proceed to install the flooring with confidence.  This is the same stuff installers use when laying new vinyl over 3/16 plywood to fill and smooth the seams. It’s fast and easy. Alex

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> OK, so my wife and daughter are pounding away at the tile floor in the foyer > with a sledge hammer (with goggles and facemasks) and piling the pieces in > bags.  "I just don’t like this anymore, it is too dark."  So I suppose I am > now on my way to installing a laminate flooring of her choice.  I will > likely be stopping in here with questions along the way, and here is my > first one: > The tiles seem to come up from the plywood floor underneath easily enough > once broken and jarred loose by the pounding (which is actually quite fun > when one actually starts to get into it).  Now we have these vast areas > where the glue remains stuck to the plywood.  It is pretty uniform across > the area in lines.  Do we need to remove this glue or can the new floor go > over it?  If we need to remove it how is this done? > — > Starting another project into the unknown……, > Tomes > (remove X from address to post)

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> OK, so my wife and daughter are pounding away at the tile floor in the foyer > with a sledge hammer (with goggles and facemasks) and piling the pieces in > bags.  "I just don’t like this anymore, it is too dark."  So I suppose I am > now on my way to installing a laminate flooring of her choice.  I will > likely be stopping in here with questions along the way, and here is my > first one: > The tiles seem to come up from the plywood floor underneath easily enough > once broken and jarred loose by the pounding (which is actually quite fun > when one actually starts to get into it).  Now we have these vast areas > where the glue remains stuck to the plywood.  It is pretty uniform across > the area in lines.  Do we need to remove this glue or can the new floor go > over it?  If we need to remove it how is this done? > — > Starting another project into the unknown……, > Tomes > (remove X from address to post) >How about a cheap belt sander, and a bunch of sanding belts for it…..

Remember to remove any curtains you have nearby before you start… – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – >it would be much easier if concrete floor, you just use a knife blade on >a long pole and push away…… cant do that with the plywood as it will >get eaten up….

Response:

…..snip > Here is your chance to vote: Should I level it and why? > Thanks again,

As I mentioned previously, the underlayment will compensate for the 1/16th variation. When I installed my Formica — which I prefer to Pergo — my floor had similar ridges; two years later the floor looks as good as it did on day one.  Now ripples, no heaving, no joint separations. But rather than waste time debating it, just go ahead and scrape the floor and you’ll be able to get started sooner than it seems it will take with anguishing over this concern  :-)

Response:

Thanks folks.  We hammered some more of it into oblivion today.  The extent of the irregularities is the height of the glue under the space under the tile as defined by its feet. Looks like about 1/16th of an inch. Sometimes this glue came off with the tile, but mostly it stayed on the plywood.  It is somewhat pliable and if I can finally find my putty knife I could see how easily I could peel it off.  There is a lot of it though. The flooring will be Pergo Presto.  It says in the Subfloor Preparation requirements: "Your subfloor must be clean dry and flat….Any low spots greater than 3/16 of an inch must be filled in with a portland cement based leveling compound. Any ridges on the floor must be removed." So they want it flat without ridges.  My ridges are 1/16th inch tops.  Sure looks like ridges to me by my eye.  Feels like it by my hand.  It ain’t no 3/16 inch however.  I don’t want to end up feeling it in my bare feet later. Here is your chance to vote: Should I level it and why? Thanks again, Tomes (remove X from address to post)

: I agree with David but your interpretation of "light" irregularities and : mine or Davids may vary widely…If you’re not sure, fill the irregularities : with a Latex leveling compound/Filler then proceed to install the flooring : with confidence.  This is the same stuff installers use when laying new : vinyl over 3/16 plywood to fill and smooth the seams. : : It’s fast and easy. : : Alex : :

: > OK, so my wife and daughter are pounding away at the tile floor in the : foyer : > with a sledge hammer (with goggles and facemasks) and piling the pieces in : > bags.  "I just don’t like this anymore, it is too dark."  So I suppose I : am : > now on my way to installing a laminate flooring of her choice.  I will : > likely be stopping in here with questions along the way, and here is my : > first one: : > : > The tiles seem to come up from the plywood floor underneath easily enough : > once broken and jarred loose by the pounding (which is actually quite fun : > when one actually starts to get into it).  Now we have these vast areas : > where the glue remains stuck to the plywood.  It is pretty uniform across : > the area in lines.  Do we need to remove this glue or can the new floor go : > over it?  If we need to remove it how is this done? : > — : > Starting another project into the unknown……, : > Tomes : > (remove X from address to post) : > : > : :

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – > …..snip > Here is your chance to vote: Should I level it and why? > Thanks again, > As I mentioned previously, the underlayment will compensate for the > 1/16th > variation. When I installed my Formica — which I prefer to Pergo — my > floor had similar ridges; two years later the floor looks as good as it > did > on day one.  Now ripples, no heaving, no joint separations. But rather > than > waste time debating it, just go ahead and scrape the floor and you’ll be > able to get started sooner than it seems it will take with anguishing > over > this concern  :-)

1/16th should be no problem at all… You could use the better underlament ( silent step) it helps with noise and imperfections in the sub-floor.  the only problem I  see is the underlament sticking to the glue residue, and possibly making noise when walked on. — Master Pergo Installer/Armstrong Certified Carpet/Vinyl/Hardwood/Ceramic/Laminate/VCT/PVC

Response:

OK, so my wife and daughter are pounding away at the tile floor in the foyer with a sledge hammer (with goggles and facemasks) and piling the pieces in bags.  "I just don’t like this anymore, it is too dark."  So I suppose I am now on my way to installing a laminate flooring of her choice.  I will likely be stopping in here with questions along the way, and here is my first one: The tiles seem to come up from the plywood floor underneath easily enough once broken and jarred loose by the pounding (which is actually quite fun when one actually starts to get into it).  Now we have these vast areas where the glue remains stuck to the plywood.  It is pretty uniform across the area in lines.  Do we need to remove this glue or can the new floor go over it?  If we need to remove it how is this done? — Starting another project into the unknown……, Tomes (remove X from address to post)

Response:

..snip > The tiles seem to come up from the plywood floor underneath easily enough > once broken and jarred loose by the pounding (which is actually quite fun > when one actually starts to get into it).  Now we have these vast areas > where the glue remains stuck to the plywood.  It is pretty uniform across > the area in lines.  Do we need to remove this glue or can the new floor go > over it?  If we need to remove it how is this done?

If the irregularities of the glue residue are light, then the foam underlayment for the laminate flooring will have no problem handling it. David

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – > OK, so my wife and daughter are pounding away at the tile floor in the foyer > with a sledge hammer (with goggles and facemasks) and piling the pieces in > bags.  "I just don’t like this anymore, it is too dark."  So I suppose I am > now on my way to installing a laminate flooring of her choice.  I will > likely be stopping in here with questions along the way, and here is my > first one: > The tiles seem to come up from the plywood floor underneath easily enough > once broken and jarred loose by the pounding (which is actually quite fun > when one actually starts to get into it).  Now we have these vast areas > where the glue remains stuck to the plywood.  It is pretty uniform across > the area in lines.  Do we need to remove this glue or can the new floor go > over it?  If we need to remove it how is this done? > — > Starting another project into the unknown……, > Tomes > (remove X from address to post)

How about a cheap belt sander, and a bunch of sanding belts for it….. it would be much easier if concrete floor, you just use a knife blade on a long pole and push away…… cant do that with the plywood as it will get eaten up….

Response:

   one   problem  i   could   imagin  with the presto  ,                  would be   the    end  of   the             plank  landing  on  the edge of the mortor , which would   give   you   a  unlevel  plank, giving   you   a clicking  sound , and   eventully     it   time   would   give  you   a  weak or    or  gaping  joint .   Pergo   is  forgiving   on   the   slope    up   to   1/8    for      i  think     a  ten   ft   span   .  i   would   not       chance   it.     Sand   or    feather   out   the   glue   or     mortor.      

Response:

I agree with David but your interpretation of "light" irregularities and mine or Davids may vary widely…If you’re not sure, fill the irregularities with a Latex leveling compound/Filler then proceed to install the flooring with confidence.  This is the same stuff installers use when laying new vinyl over 3/16 plywood to fill and smooth the seams. It’s fast and easy. Alex

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> OK, so my wife and daughter are pounding away at the tile floor in the foyer > with a sledge hammer (with goggles and facemasks) and piling the pieces in > bags.  "I just don’t like this anymore, it is too dark."  So I suppose I am > now on my way to installing a laminate flooring of her choice.  I will > likely be stopping in here with questions along the way, and here is my > first one: > The tiles seem to come up from the plywood floor underneath easily enough > once broken and jarred loose by the pounding (which is actually quite fun > when one actually starts to get into it).  Now we have these vast areas > where the glue remains stuck to the plywood.  It is pretty uniform across > the area in lines.  Do we need to remove this glue or can the new floor go > over it?  If we need to remove it how is this done? > — > Starting another project into the unknown……, > Tomes > (remove X from address to post)

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> OK, so my wife and daughter are pounding away at the tile floor in the foyer > with a sledge hammer (with goggles and facemasks) and piling the pieces in > bags.  "I just don’t like this anymore, it is too dark."  So I suppose I am > now on my way to installing a laminate flooring of her choice.  I will > likely be stopping in here with questions along the way, and here is my > first one: > The tiles seem to come up from the plywood floor underneath easily enough > once broken and jarred loose by the pounding (which is actually quite fun > when one actually starts to get into it).  Now we have these vast areas > where the glue remains stuck to the plywood.  It is pretty uniform across > the area in lines.  Do we need to remove this glue or can the new floor go > over it?  If we need to remove it how is this done? > — > Starting another project into the unknown……, > Tomes > (remove X from address to post) >How about a cheap belt sander, and a bunch of sanding belts for it…..

Remember to remove any curtains you have nearby before you start… – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – >it would be much easier if concrete floor, you just use a knife blade on >a long pole and push away…… cant do that with the plywood as it will >get eaten up….

Response:

…..snip > Here is your chance to vote: Should I level it and why? > Thanks again,

As I mentioned previously, the underlayment will compensate for the 1/16th variation. When I installed my Formica — which I prefer to Pergo — my floor had similar ridges; two years later the floor looks as good as it did on day one.  Now ripples, no heaving, no joint separations. But rather than waste time debating it, just go ahead and scrape the floor and you’ll be able to get started sooner than it seems it will take with anguishing over this concern  :-)

Response:

Thanks folks.  We hammered some more of it into oblivion today.  The extent of the irregularities is the height of the glue under the space under the tile as defined by its feet. Looks like about 1/16th of an inch. Sometimes this glue came off with the tile, but mostly it stayed on the plywood.  It is somewhat pliable and if I can finally find my putty knife I could see how easily I could peel it off.  There is a lot of it though. The flooring will be Pergo Presto.  It says in the Subfloor Preparation requirements: "Your subfloor must be clean dry and flat….Any low spots greater than 3/16 of an inch must be filled in with a portland cement based leveling compound. Any ridges on the floor must be removed." So they want it flat without ridges.  My ridges are 1/16th inch tops.  Sure looks like ridges to me by my eye.  Feels like it by my hand.  It ain’t no 3/16 inch however.  I don’t want to end up feeling it in my bare feet later. Here is your chance to vote: Should I level it and why? Thanks again, Tomes (remove X from address to post)

: I agree with David but your interpretation of "light" irregularities and : mine or Davids may vary widely…If you’re not sure, fill the irregularities : with a Latex leveling compound/Filler then proceed to install the flooring : with confidence.  This is the same stuff installers use when laying new : vinyl over 3/16 plywood to fill and smooth the seams. : : It’s fast and easy. : : Alex : :

: > OK, so my wife and daughter are pounding away at the tile floor in the : foyer : > with a sledge hammer (with goggles and facemasks) and piling the pieces in : > bags.  "I just don’t like this anymore, it is too dark."  So I suppose I : am : > now on my way to installing a laminate flooring of her choice.  I will : > likely be stopping in here with questions along the way, and here is my : > first one: : > : > The tiles seem to come up from the plywood floor underneath easily enough : > once broken and jarred loose by the pounding (which is actually quite fun : > when one actually starts to get into it).  Now we have these vast areas : > where the glue remains stuck to the plywood.  It is pretty uniform across : > the area in lines.  Do we need to remove this glue or can the new floor go : > over it?  If we need to remove it how is this done? : > — : > Starting another project into the unknown……, : > Tomes : > (remove X from address to post) : > : > : :

Response:

– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – > …..snip > Here is your chance to vote: Should I level it and why? > Thanks again, > As I mentioned previously, the underlayment will compensate for the > 1/16th > variation. When I installed my Formica — which I prefer to Pergo — my > floor had similar ridges; two years later the floor looks as good as it > did > on day one.  Now ripples, no heaving, no joint separations. But rather > than > waste time debating it, just go ahead and scrape the floor and you’ll be > able to get started sooner than it seems it will take with anguishing > over > this concern  :-)

1/16th should be no problem at all… You could use the better underlament ( silent step) it helps with noise and imperfections in the sub-floor.  the only problem I  see is the underlament sticking to the glue residue, and possibly making noise when walked on. — Master Pergo Installer/Armstrong Certified Carpet/Vinyl/Hardwood/Ceramic/Laminate/VCT/PVC

Response:

OK, so my wife and daughter are pounding away at the tile floor in the foyer with a sledge hammer (with goggles and facemasks) and piling the pieces in bags.  "I just don’t like this anymore, it is too dark."  So I suppose I am now on my way to installing a laminate flooring of her choice.  I will likely be stopping in here with questions along the way, and here is my first one: The tiles seem to come up from the plywood floor underneath easily enough once broken and jarred loose by the pounding (which is actually quite fun when one actually starts to get into it).  Now we have these vast areas where the glue remains stuck to the plywood.  It is pretty uniform across the area in lines.  Do we need to remove this glue or can the new floor go over it?  If we need to remove it how is this done? — Starting another project into the unknown……, Tomes (remove X from address to post)

Response:

..snip > The tiles seem to come up from the plywood floor underneath easily enough > once broken and jarred loose by the pounding (which is actually quite fun > when one actually starts to get into it).  Now we have these vast areas > where the glue remains stuck to the plywood.  It is pretty uniform across > the area in lines.  Do we need to remove this glue or can the new floor go > over it?  If we need to remove it how is this done?

If the irregularities of the glue residue are light, then the foam underlayment for the laminate flooring will have no problem handling it. David

Response:

- Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – > OK, so my wife and daughter are pounding away at the tile floor in the foyer > with a sledge hammer (with goggles and facemasks) and piling the pieces in > bags.  "I just don’t like this anymore, it is too dark."  So I suppose I am > now on my way to installing a laminate flooring of her choice.  I will > likely be stopping in here with questions along the way, and here is my > first one: > The tiles seem to come up from the plywood floor underneath easily enough > once broken and jarred loose by the pounding (which is actually quite fun > when one actually starts to get into it).  Now we have these vast areas > where the glue remains stuck to the plywood.  It is pretty uniform across > the area in lines.  Do we need to remove this glue or can the new floor go > over it?  If we need to remove it how is this done? > — > Starting another project into the unknown……, > Tomes > (remove X from address to post)

How about a cheap belt sander, and a bunch of sanding belts for it….. it would be much easier if concrete floor, you just use a knife blade on a long pole and push away…… cant do that with the plywood as it will get eaten up….

Response: