Question:
> All legal documents were handled by my realtor, the seller’s realtor, and > the title insurance/escrow company.
exactly. in addition, most documents are, essentially, forms that are well-known and well-understood all around. home-buying customs even vary within a state; closures in northern california are different than in southern ca … — # henry mensch / <henry at verve.org> / http://www.verve.org/henry/
Response:
Please post. TIA.
Response:
1. Use an attorney and have him/her review any paperwork you sign. 2. Order Bruce Williams’ book House Smart http://www.brucewilliams.com Well worth the $20 you’ll spend. 3. Don’t try to save small amounts of money an attorney and the book will cost. This will be your most expensive purchase you make during your lifetime, and you’ll be paying for up to 30 years if you finance it. Good luck.
– Hide quoted text — Show quoted text -> Please post. TIA.
Response:
>1. Use an attorney and have him/her review any paperwork you sign.
Make that BEFORE you sign. After can be too late. -v.
Response:
>>1. Use an attorney and have him/her review any paperwork you sign. >Make that BEFORE you sign. After can be too late.
I thought our real-estate lady was going to have a heart attack when I demanded to have completed copies of all forms I was going to have to sign at closing at least three days prior to closing so my attorney could review them. She initially refused, saying that such things simply weren’t done, but she finally found a way when we refused to close without an ample opportunity to see what we were signing. Is this really an unusual demand?
Response:
>I thought our real-estate lady was going to have a heart attack >when I demanded to have completed copies of all forms I was going >to have to sign at closing at least three days prior to closing >so my attorney could review them. She initially refused, saying >that such things simply weren’t done, but she finally found a way >when we refused to close without an ample opportunity to see what >we were signing. Is this really an unusual demand?
No, but lawyers are often viewed as deal-breakers. That is, they rarely help a sale go through and more frequently they move to jeopardize it. So your real estate lady would rather not get an attorney involved as he could potentially bring things to the table that would slow the deal if not kill it. It’s not a case of her hiding something, but just trying to expedite what seems to be a sure deal whether it’s in your benefit or not. Dimitri
Response:
[...] >I thought our real-estate lady was going to have a heart attack >when I demanded to have completed copies of all forms I was going >to have to sign at closing at least three days prior to closing >so my attorney could review them. She initially refused, saying >that such things simply weren’t done, but she finally found a way >when we refused to close without an ample opportunity to see what >we were signing. Is this really an unusual demand?
It depends on where you’re buying. In California, getting a real estate lawyer involved in a routine house sale is extremely unusual. I bought a townhouse in the SF Bay Area last year and there were no lawyers involved. All legal documents were handled by my realtor, the seller’s realtor, and the title insurance/escrow company. Typically, lawyers get involved only if there is something unusual about the property, or if the sale somehow goes wrong (fraud, the owner dies before closing, etc.). In other parts of the country (such as the east coast), it is customary for lawyers to handle the legal paperwork. Actually, many home-buying customs vary from state to state and region to region. — Dave Schreiber "Can money pay for all the days ^^^^^ ^^^^ -Primitive Radio Gods (SOaBPBwMiMH) (For my e-mail address, swap the ^^^’d parts and remove the "2")
Response:
: All legal documents were handled by my realtor, the seller’s realtor, and : the title insurance/escrow company. Typically, lawyers get involved only : if there is something unusual about the property, or if the sale somehow : goes wrong (fraud, the owner dies before closing, etc.). Well that’s just durn crazy!
Bringing in a lawyer *after* something goes awry seems a little late. I live in Boston, and the lawyers are an absolutely necessity at the Purchase and Sale contract phase. The buyer has to put down a hefty deposit, and there is some jockeying between the buyer and seller attorneys over language and who is responsible (and how much so fiscally) if the deal falls through. Also, the ‘form’ documents that the realtors draw up are slanted toward forcing everyone to go through with the deal (so that they make their commission). A good real estate lawyer is just an insurance policy. When I bought my condo a couple of years ago, my lawyer basically told me that I didn’t need him at all during closing. The mortgage bank’s attorney would make sure everything was in order, because at that point they were basically my business partner. Keith
Response:
While I agree that you did the right thing wanting the paperwork before hand to allow your attorney to review it, a lot of times this isn’t really needed. Typically, lawyers know each other. An attorney for you, could quickly look at the paperwork and quickly access it as being the other attorney’s regular "form" contract. Something your attorney would have seen and read dozens of times before. Therefore, your attorney already knows what is "good" and what needs to be changed. Changes don’t take very much time because the two attorneys usually have already hashed out these points before, and already have a working compromise. PS: Remember to insist on a walk-through of the house the day of the closing, preferable within an hour or two. Don’t get the "too busy". If the RE lady is too busy, then tell her to reschedule. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – > I thought our real-estate lady was going to have a heart attack > when I demanded to have completed copies of all forms I was going > to have to sign at closing at least three days prior to closing > so my attorney could review them. She initially refused, saying > that such things simply weren’t done, but she finally found a way > when we refused to close without an ample opportunity to see what > we were signing. Is this really an unusual demand?
Response:
Very true. And typically, you (the buyer) are paying for the bank’s attorney directly. Take advantage of the service you for which are paying. BTW, the bank’s attorney is usually picker since most of the money buying the house is coming from the bank, and not from you, the buyer. – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text – > When I bought my condo a couple of years ago, my lawyer basically told > me that I didn’t need him at all during closing. The mortgage bank’s > attorney would make sure everything was in order, because at that > point they were basically my business partner.
Response:
>: All legal documents were handled by my realtor, the seller’s realtor, and >: the title insurance/escrow company. Typically, lawyers get involved only >: if there is something unusual about the property, or if the sale somehow >: goes wrong (fraud, the owner dies before closing, etc.). > Well that’s just durn crazy!
Bringing in a lawyer *after* something > goes awry seems a little late.
That’s how it works in 99% of transactions in life. Does anyone get a lawyer to check out a purchase contract for a car before buying the car? Even if it’s an expensive car that costs as much as a (cheap, backwoods) house? How about rental contracts for apartments? When it comes to contract law, IMHO lawyers are most useful for drawing up customized contracts for individual situations (business agreements, for example, or wills). Having a lawyer look over a form that’s been successfully used by 500,000 home buyers in the last couple of years seems rather pointless. > I live in Boston, and the lawyers are an absolutely necessity at the > Purchase and Sale contract phase. The buyer has to put down a hefty > deposit, and there is some jockeying between the buyer and seller > attorneys over language and who is responsible (and how much so fiscally) > if the deal falls through.
Does this jockeying go on for _every_ house sale? Here in California, there’s more dependence on legal precedent. If the seller backs out or can’t satisfy a contingency, the buyer gets 100% of the deposit back. If the buyer backs out just for the hell of it, then it gets more complicated, but there’s enough legal precedent so that there isn’t a perceived need to spell out in advance how this situation will be handled. [...] > When I bought my condo a couple of years ago, my lawyer basically told > me that I didn’t need him at all during closing. The mortgage bank’s > attorney would make sure everything was in order, because at that > point they were basically my business partner.
I find it interesting, BTW, that in Boston the buyer’s lawyer is present for signing the initial contract, but doesn’t deal at all with the 2" thick stack of documents at closing. If I had to choose, I’d much prefer that my lawyer look over the 2" stack of custom-written closing documents, rather than the 5-6 standardized purchase contract forms. — Dave Schreiber "Can money pay for all the days ^^^^^ ^^^^ -Primitive Radio Gods (SOaBPBwMiMH) (For my e-mail address, swap the ^^^’d parts and remove the "2")
Response:
Q: was about practice of suppling closing documents to buyer 3 days prior to closing for review by his attorney. Is this rare? – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->Around here, it is. Here in NC closings are done by attorneys. This >means that all the papers are assembled and filled in by paralegals in >the office. And you can bet with almost 100% certainty that the >paralegal won’t even start working on your closing papers until the day >before the closing, and if your closing is at a peak time (like the end >of the month) they will be doing them late the night before or even the >day of closing. This is the case no matter how far ahead of time you >booked your closing. >Lenders know this is the case, so they don’t generally provide the >paperwork package that’s needed to do the closing papers to the attny >office until a couple of days beforehand, etc etc. >So I think it would be very unusual to get all the papers in order 3 >days beforehand! I think it would be nearly impossible without forcing >the closing attorneys and lenders to significantly change how they do >business for your one closing, and the attorney may just decide it’s not >worth the trouble and decline to do your closing.
In our case, it was OUR attorney who demanded the time. He insisted that he cannot adequately review all of the paperwork placed in front of him at a closing instantaneously. Unless the other participants were prepared for a very long meeting, they had to give him copies of the paperwork in advance. It seemed perfectly reasonable to me and I was surprised to learn that the practice isn’t common.
Response:
Thanks to all for their participation thus far. I am getting a genuine education here.
Response:
I think you should be applauded for asking for the time to review. Whether or not it is "typical" has nothing to do with it since the contract you sign is a unique document. In fact, I was required to get a new library card a couple weeks ago and had to sign a statement "that I had read and UNDERSTOOD the contract". Guess that’s what we all would like to do with contracts??? Ace
Response:
Hi Dave, : I find it interesting, BTW, that in Boston the buyer’s lawyer is present : for signing the initial contract, but doesn’t deal at all with the 2" : thick stack of documents at closing. If I had to choose, I’d much prefer : that my lawyer look over the 2" stack of custom-written closing documents, : rather than the 5-6 standardized purchase contract forms. I found the closing documents to be a lot simpler than the P & S. The Purchase & Sale is a *contract*. The standard form provided by the realtors works fine in 99.9% of the cases, but when it doesn’t, there can be significant damage to one or both parties. Your lawyer has a better feel for what might go wrong in the transaction. And (most importantly), the real estate standard form is slanted toward *their* interests… not yours. For example, the standard form’s inspection rider states that the buyer can back out if the inspector finds repairs needed will cost over $’x’ (where you can fill in an amount). A well-informed buyer wil cross that out and replace it with "subject to a home inspection satisfactory to the buyer". See the difference? The closing *documents* are really just formalities. Transfers of deeds, mortgage loan papers, miscellaneous government documents (like lead-paint awareness), etc. etc. etc. At this point, it’s very much like buying a (tremendously) expensive car, and that’s why you shouldn’t need your attorney present. Keith
Response:
While I too didn’t use a lawyer for my past house purchases and sales, one cannot overstate that you really need to read and understand all those contracts. If you use the standard form contracts and read them after signing you’re likely to be unhappily surprised. Any little detail in the contract may cost you hundreds or thousands of dollars, commit you to the purchase in circumstances you might otherwise assume would void the deal, or leave you open to a breach of contract lawsuit. The real estate agents make money only when the deal goes through, so it’s very likely they’ll provide you with contract terms that won’t let either party out of the deal under any circumstances. If you are a first time buyer, you won’t be dealing with a purchase contingent on the sale of your house (which in some circumstances might give a buyer some flexibility to escape a deal if they decide they need out and don’t have sufficient contingencies elsewhere). Just so you don’t get the wrong idea, I did not end up in those circumstances. But, I did end up having to move twice to get my last home purchase, as I accepted an offer on my old house after having my purchase offer accepted, but before a purchasing closing date was set (and my buyer had a contract that could force a closing date before I could close on my purchase). And, just in case you haven’t read the news, be certain you like the deal. Don’t trust what appraisers say the house is worth, appraisers who say houses are worth less than offered prices don’t get referrals from real estate agents. Be similarly careful with your selection of a home inspector. Make sure you know what the buyer paid for the house (especially if it was recent), but you can’t really assume they _didn’t_ overpay. And again, read the contracts carefully. You should count on everything in the contract being enforced. Remember you can negotiate everything, not just with the sellers, but with most fees paid to the agents and closing company. That’s probably the main reason it would be nice to have any contracts 3 days before. It’s important to see where your money is going without needing to spend 3 days at the actual closing table so you can determine if any of the numbers need to be negotiated (for those costs that you haven’t already contracted). Andrew – Hide quoted text — Show quoted text ->: All legal documents were handled by my realtor, the seller’s realtor, and >: the title insurance/escrow company. Typically, lawyers get involved only >: if there is something unusual about the property, or if the sale somehow >: goes wrong (fraud, the owner dies before closing, etc.). > Well that’s just durn crazy!
Bringing in a lawyer *after* something > goes awry seems a little late. > That’s how it works in 99% of transactions in life. Does anyone get a > lawyer to check out a purchase contract for a car before buying the car? > Even if it’s an expensive car that costs as much as a (cheap, backwoods) > house? How about rental contracts for apartments? > When it comes to contract law, IMHO lawyers are most useful for drawing up > customized contracts for individual situations (business agreements, for > example, or wills). Having a lawyer look over a form that’s been > successfully used by 500,000 home buyers in the last couple of years seems > rather pointless. > I live in Boston, and the lawyers are an absolutely necessity at the > Purchase and Sale contract phase. The buyer has to put down a hefty > deposit, and there is some jockeying between the buyer and seller > attorneys over language and who is responsible (and how much so fiscally) > if the deal falls through. > Does this jockeying go on for _every_ house sale? Here in California, > there’s more dependence on legal precedent. If the seller backs out or > can’t satisfy a contingency, the buyer gets 100% of the deposit back. If > the buyer backs out just for the hell of it, then it gets more > complicated, but there’s enough legal precedent so that there isn’t a > perceived need to spell out in advance how this situation will be handled. > [...] > When I bought my condo a couple of years ago, my lawyer basically told > me that I didn’t need him at all during closing. The mortgage bank’s > attorney would make sure everything was in order, because at that > point they were basically my business partner. > I find it interesting, BTW, that in Boston the buyer’s lawyer is present > for signing the initial contract, but doesn’t deal at all with the 2" > thick stack of documents at closing. If I had to choose, I’d much prefer > that my lawyer look over the 2" stack of custom-written closing documents, > rather than the 5-6 standardized purchase contract forms.
Posted in